Iodido{4-phenyl-1-[1-(1,3-thia­zol-2-yl-κN)ethyl­idene]thio­semicarbazidato-κ2 N′,S}{4-phenyl-1-[1-(1,3-thia­zol-2-yl)ethyl­idene]thio­semicarbazide-κS}mercury(II)

In the title compound, [Hg(C12H11N4S2)I(C12H12N4S2)], the Hg atom is in a distorted square-pyramidal coordination, defined by the iodide ligand, by the S atom of the neutral ligand in the apical position, and by the N atom of the thia­zole ring, the thio­ureido N and the S atom of the deprotonated ligand. The deprotonated ligand intra­molecularly hydrogen bonds to the thia­zole ring N atom, while the deprotonated ligand forms an inter­molecular hydrogen bond to the thiol­ate S atom. The deprotonation of the tridentate ligand and its coordination to Hg via the S atom strikingly affects the C—S bond lengths. In the free ligand, the C—S bond distance is 1.685 (7) Å, whereas it is 1.749 (7) Å in the deprotonated ligand. Similarly, the Hg—S bond distance is slightly longer to the neutral ligand [2.6682 (18) Å] than to the deprotonated ligand [2.5202 (19) Å]. The Hg—I distance is 2.7505 (8) Å

Chloridodiphen­yl{[1-(1,3-thia­zol-2-yl-κN)ethyl­idene]-4-phenyl­thio­semicarbazidato-κ2 N 1,S}tin(IV) methanol monosolvate

The title compound, [Sn(C6H5)2(C12H11N4S2)Cl]·CH4O, is formed during the reaction between 2-acetyl­thia­zole 4-phenyl­thio­semicarbazone (Hacthptsc) and diphenyl­tin(IV) dichloride in methanol. In the crystal structure, the Sn atom exhibits an octa­hedral geometry with the [N2S] anionic tridentate thio­semicarbazone ligand having chloride trans to the central N and the two phenyl groups trans to each other. The Sn—Cl distance is 2.5929 (6), Sn—S is 2.4896 (6) and Sn—N to the central N is 2.3220 (16) Å. The MeOH mol­ecules link the Sn complexes into one-dimensional chains via N—H⋯O and O—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds

Photodegradation of Selected PCBs in the Presence of Nano-TiO2 as Catalyst and H2O2 as an Oxidant

Photodegradation of five strategically selected PCBs was carried out in acetonitrile/water 80:20. Quantum chemical calculations reveal that PCBs without any chlorine on ortho-positions are closer to be planar, while PCBs with at least one chlorine atoms at the ortho-positions causes the two benzene rings to be nearly perpendicular. Light-induced degradation of planar PCBs is much slower than the perpendicular ones. The use of nano-TiO2 speeds up the degradation of the planar PCBs, but slows down the degradation of the non-planar ones. The use of H2O2 speeds up the degradation of planar PCBs greatly (by >20 times), but has little effect on non-planar ones except 2,3,5,6-TCB. The relative photodegradation rate is: 2,2′,4,4′-TCB > 2,3,5,6-TCB > 2,6-DCB ≈ 3,3′,4,4′-TCB > 3,4′,5-TCB. The use of H2O2 in combination with sunlight irradiation could be an efficient and “green” technology for PCB remediation

Photodegradation of Selected PCBs in the Presence of Nano-TiO2 as Catalyst and H2O2 as an Oxidant

Photodegradation of five strategically selected PCBs was carried out in acetonitrile/water 80:20. Quantum chemical calculations reveal that PCBs without any chlorine on ortho-positions are closer to be planar, while PCBs with at least one chlorine atoms at the ortho-positions causes the two benzene rings to be nearly perpendicular. Light-induced degradation of planar PCBs is much slower than the perpendicular ones. The use of nano-TiO2 speeds up the degradation of the planar PCBs, but slows down the degradation of the non-planar ones. The use of H2O2 speeds up the degradation of planar PCBs greatly (by >20 times), but has little effect on non-planar ones except 2,3,5,6-TCB. The relative photodegradation rate is: 2,2’,4,4’-TCB > 2,3,5,6-TCB > 2,6-DCB ≈ 3,3’,4,4’-TCB > 3,4’,5-TCB. The use of H2O2 in combination with sunlight irradiation could be an efficient and “green” technology for PCB remediation