11 research outputs found

    Occupational exposure to organic solvent mixtures during pregnancy and the risk of non‐syndromic oral clefts

    No full text
    International audienceOBJECTIVES: To examine the association between maternal occupational exposure to mixtures of organic solvents during pregnancy and the risk of non-syndromic oral clefts. METHODS: A case-control study (164 cleft lip with/without cleft palate (CL/P), 76 cleft palate (CP), 236 controls) was conducted in France to investigate the role of maternal occupational exposure to organic solvents at the beginning of pregnancy in the risk of non-syndromic oral clefts. An expert chemist, guided by a detailed description of the women's occupational tasks, assessed exposure for each. Analysis of the findings used logistic regression. RESULTS: In the control group, 39% of the women who reported working during pregnancy were exposed to at least one type of organic solvent. The risk of oral clefts was associated with oxygenated (for CL/P: OR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.9; and for CP, OR = 1.4, 95% CI 0.7 to 2.7), chlorinated (OR = 9.4, 95% CI 2.5 to 35.3; OR = 3.8, 95% CI 0.7 to 20.7), and petroleum (OR = 3.6, 95% CI 1.5 to 8.8; OR = 1.2, 95% CI 0.3 to 4.9) solvents. The risk of oral clefts increased linearly with level of exposure within the three subgroups of oxygenated solvents we considered (aliphatic alcohols, glycol ethers, and other oxygenated solvents, including esters, ketones, and aliphatic aldehydes). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that maternal occupational exposure to organic solvents during pregnancy may play a role in the aetiology of oral clefts. The limited number of subjects and the problem of multiple exposures require that these results be interpreted cautiously

    Trends in the proportion of resistant bacteria involved in ventilator-associated pneumonia as the first hospital-acquired infection in intensive care units between 2003 and 2016 in Lyon, France

    No full text
    International audienceThe aim of this study was to describe the proportion of multidrug-resistant microorganisms (MDROs) involved in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) as the first hospital-acquired infection in 536 adults with restricted risk factors for MDRO-related infection. We found a significant decrease in the percentage of MDROs involved in VAP between 2003 and 2016 and this percentage increased when VAP occurred after day 10

    Quelles mesures pour maĂźtriser le risque infectieux chez les patients immunodĂ©primĂ©s ? Recommandations formalisĂ©es d’experts

    No full text
    International audienceThe increase use of immunosuppressive treatments in patients with solid cancer and/or inflammatory diseases requires revisiting our practices for the prevention of infectious risk in the care setting. A review of the literature by a multidisciplinary working group at the beginning of 2014 wished to answer the following 4 questions to improve healthcare immunocompromised patients: (I) How can we define immunocompromised patients with high, intermediate and low infectious risk, (II) which air treatment should be recommended for this specific population? (III) What additional precautions should be recommended for immunocompromised patients at risk for infection? (IV) Which global environmental control should be recommended? Based on data from the literature and using the GRADE method, we propose 15 recommendations that could help to reduce the risk of infection in these exposed populations.L’intensification des traitements immunosuppresseurs et la gĂ©nĂ©ralisation de leur utilisation aux patients atteints de cancer solide et/ou de maladies inflammatoires nĂ©cessitent de revisiter nos pratiques de prĂ©vention du risque infectieux en milieu de soin. Cette rĂ©vision est justifiĂ©e aussi par les modifications de nos pratiques avec une intensification des prises en charge en structures de soins de suites rĂ©habilitation et en ambulatoire. Une revue de la littĂ©rature menĂ©e par un groupe de travail multidisciplinaire rĂ©uni dĂ©but 2014 a souhaitĂ© rĂ©pondre aux 4 questions suivantes : (i) Quelle dĂ©finition des patients immunodĂ©primĂ©s Ă  risque infectieux Ă©levĂ©, intermĂ©diaire et faible, (ii) Quel traitement d’air recommander pour les patients immunodĂ©primĂ©s Ă  risque d’infections ? (iii) Quelles prĂ©cautions complĂ©mentaires recommander pour les patients immunodĂ©primĂ©s Ă  risque d’infections ? (iv) Quelle maĂźtrise globale de l’environnement recommander pour les patients immunodĂ©primĂ©s Ă  risque d’infections ? À partir des donnĂ©es de la littĂ©rature et en utilisant la mĂ©thode GRADE, nous proposons 15 recommandations qui permettront de rĂ©duire le risque infectieux dans ces populations exposĂ©es
    corecore