IgM exacerbates glomerular disease progression in complement-induced glomerulopathy

While glomerular IgM deposition occurs in a variety of glomerular diseases the mechanism of deposition and its clinical significance remain controversial. Some have theorized IgM becomes passively trapped in areas of glomerulosclerosis. However, recent studies found that IgM specifically binds damaged glomeruli. Therefore, we tested whether natural IgM binds to neo-epitopes exposed after insults to the glomerulus and exacerbate disease in mice deficient in the complement regulatory protein factor H; a model of non-sclerotic and nonimmune-complex glomerular disease. Immunofluorescence microscopy demonstrated mesangial and capillary loop deposition of IgM while ultrastructural analysis found IgM deposition on endothelial cells and subendothelial areas. Factor H deficient mice lacking B cells were protected from renal damage, as evidenced by milder histologic lesions on light and electron microscopy. IgM, but not IgG, from wild-type mice bound to cultured murine mesangial cells. Furthermore, injection of purified IgM into mice lacking B cells bound within the glomeruli and induced proteinuria. A monoclonal natural IgM recognizing phospholipids also bound to glomeruli in vivo and induced albuminuria. Thus, our results indicate specific IgM antibodies bind to glomerular epitopes and that IgM contributes to the progression of glomerular damage in this mouse model of non-sclerotic glomerular disease

Distinct roles for the complement regulators factor H and Crry in protection of the kidney from injury

International audienc

Consensus definitions for glomerular lesions by light and electron microscopy: recommendations from a working group of the Renal Pathology Society

Over the past 2 decades, scoring systems for multiple glomerular diseases have emerged, as have consortia of pathologists and nephrologists for the study of glomerular diseases, including correlation of pathologic findings with clinical features and outcomes. However, one important limitation faced by members of these consortia and other renal pathologists and nephrologists in both investigative work and routine practice remains a lack of uniformity and precision in clearly defining the morphologic lesions on which the scoring systems are based. In response to this issue, the Renal Pathology Society organized a working group to identify the most frequently identified glomerular lesions observed by light microscopy and electron microscopy, review the literature to capture the published definitions most often used for each, and determine consensus terms and definitions for each lesion in a series of online and in-person meetings. The defined lesions or abnormal findings are not specific for any individual disease or subset of diseases, but rather can be applied across the full spectrum of glomerular diseases and within the context of the different scoring systems used for evaluating and reporting these diseases. In addition to facilitating glomerular disease research, standardized terms and definitions should help harmonize reporting of medical kidney diseases worldwide and lead to more-precise diagnoses and improved patient care.Immunopathology of vascular and renal diseases and of organ and celltransplantationIP1

Consensus definitions for glomerular lesions by light and electron microscopy: recommendations from a working group of the Renal Pathology Society

Over the past 2 decades, scoring systems for multiple glomerular diseases have emerged, as have consortia of pathologists and nephrologists for the study of glomerular diseases, including correlation of pathologic findings with clinical features and outcomes. However, one important limitation faced by members of these consortia and other renal pathologists and nephrologists in both investigative work and routine practice remains a lack of uniformity and precision in clearly defining the morphologic lesions on which the scoring systems are based. In response to this issue, the Renal Pathology Society organized a working group to identify the most frequently identified glomerular lesions observed by light microscopy and electron microscopy, review the literature to capture the published definitions most often used for each, and determine consensus terms and definitions for each lesion in a series of online and in-person meetings. The defined lesions or abnormal findings are not specific for any individual disease or subset of diseases, but rather can be applied across the full spectrum of glomerular diseases and within the context of the different scoring systems used for evaluating and reporting these diseases. In addition to facilitating glomerular disease research, standardized terms and definitions should help harmonize reporting of medical kidney diseases worldwide and lead to more-precise diagnoses and improved patient care

Consensus definitions for glomerular lesions by light and electron microscopy: recommendations from a working group of the Renal Pathology Society

Over the past 2 decades, scoring systems for multiple glomerular diseases have emerged, as have consortia of pathologists and nephrologists for the study of glomerular diseases, including correlation of pathologic findings with clinical features and outcomes. However, one important limitation faced by members of these consortia and other renal pathologists and nephrologists in both investigative work and routine practice remains a lack of uniformity and precision in clearly defining the morphologic lesions on which the scoring systems are based. In response to this issue, the Renal Pathology Society organized a working group to identify the most frequently identified glomerular lesions observed by light microscopy and electron microscopy, review the literature to capture the published definitions most often used for each, and determine consensus terms and definitions for each lesion in a series of online and in-person meetings. The defined lesions or abnormal findings are not specific for any individual disease or subset of diseases, but rather can be applied across the full spectrum of glomerular diseases and within the context of the different scoring systems used for evaluating and reporting these diseases. In addition to facilitating glomerular disease research, standardized terms and definitions should help harmonize reporting of medical kidney diseases worldwide and lead to more-precise diagnoses and improved patient care

Impact of Consensus Definitions on Identification of Glomerular Lesions by Light and Electron Microscopy

Introduction: In 2020, a working group of 13 renal pathologists published consensus definitions for 47 individual glomerular lesions found on light microscopy (LM) and 47 glomerular lesions and 9 normal structures found on electron microscopy (EM). Methods: To test the impact of these definitions on identification of these lesions and structures, 2 surveys were circulated to all members of the Renal Pathology Society (RPS), each having 32 images (19 LM, 13 EM) and accompanying questions with 5 multiple-choice answers, one being the consensus choice of the working group. The first survey (survey 1 [S1]), answered by 297 RPS members, was sent in September 2020, before publication of the consensus definitions. The second (survey 2 [S2]), with images of the same lesions and structures (but not the same images) and the same questions and multiple choices in different order, was sent in April 2020, 5 months after the publication of the definitions. Results: S2 was taken by 181 RPS members; 64% also took S1 and 61% reported having read the definitions paper (def. paper). Mean agreement with the consensus answers increased modestly between the 2 surveys (65.2% vs. 72.0%, P = 0.097); the increase was greater and significant when only respondents to S2 who read the def. paper were considered (65.2% vs. 74.8%, P = 0.026). Furthermore, in S2 agreement with consensus answers was greater among respondents who read this paper versus those who did not (66.9% vs. 74.8%, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Publication of the consensus definitions modestly improved interobserver agreement in identification of glomerular lesions

Impact of Consensus Definitions on Identification of Glomerular Lesions by Light and Electron Microscopy

Introduction: In 2020, a working group of 13 renal pathologists published consensus definitions for 47 individual glomerular lesions found on light microscopy (LM) and 47 glomerular lesions and 9 normal structures found on electron microscopy (EM). Methods: To test the impact of these definitions on identification of these lesions and structures, 2 surveys were circulated to all members of the Renal Pathology Society (RPS), each having 32 images (19 LM, 13 EM) and accompanying questions with 5 multiple-choice answers, one being the consensus choice of the working group. The first survey (survey 1 [S1]), answered by 297 RPS members, was sent in September 2020, before publication of the consensus definitions. The second (survey 2 (S2]), with images of the same lesions and structures (but not the same images) and the same questions and multiple choices in different order, was sent in April 2020, 5 months after the publication of the definitions. Results: S2 was taken by 181 RPS members; 64% also took 51 and 61% reported having read the definitions paper (def. paper). Mean agreement with the consensus answers increased modestly between the 2 surveys (65.2% vs. 72.0%, P = 0.097); the increase was greater and significant when only respondents to S2 who read the def. paper were considered (65.2% vs. 74.8%, P = 0.026). Furthermore, in S2 agreement with consensus answers was greater among respondents who read this paper versus those who did not (66.9% vs. 74.8%, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Publication of the consensus definitions modestly improved interobserver agreement in identification of glomerular lesions

Loss of decay-accelerating factor triggers podocyte injury and glomerulosclerosis

Kidney glomerulosclerosis commonly progresses to end-stage kidney failure, but pathogenic mechanisms are still poorly understood. Here, we show that podocyte expression of decay-accelerating factor (DAF/CD55), a complement C3 convertase regulator, crucially controls disease in murine models of adriamycin (ADR)-induced focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic glomerulosclerosis. ADR induces enzymatic cleavage of DAF from podocyte surfaces, leading to complement activation. C3 deficiency or prevention of C3a receptor (C3aR) signaling abrogates disease despite DAF deficiency, confirming complement dependence. Mechanistic studies show that C3a/C3aR ligations on podocytes initiate an autocrine IL-1\u3b2/IL-1R1 signaling loop that reduces nephrin expression, causing actin cytoskeleton rearrangement. Uncoupling IL-1\u3b2/IL-1R1 signaling prevents disease, providing a causal link. Glomeruli of patients with FSGS lack DAF and stain positive for C3d, and urinary C3a positively correlates with the degree of proteinuria. Together, our data indicate that the development and progression of glomerulosclerosis involve loss of podocyte DAF, triggering local, complement-dependent, IL-1\u3b2-induced podocyte injury, potentially identifying new therapeutic targets

Reproducibility of the Oxford Classification of IgA nephropathy, impact of biopsy scoring on treatment allocation and clinical relevance of disagreements: evidence from the VALIGA study cohort

Objective & Methods: The VALIGA study investigated the utility of the Oxford Classification of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) in 1147 patients from 13 European countries. Biopsies were scored by local pathologists followed by central review in Oxford. We had two distinct objectives: to assess how closely pathology findings were associated with the decision to give corticosteroid/immunosuppressive treatments (CS/IS), and to determine the impact of differences in MEST-C scoring between central and local pathologists on the clinical value of the Oxford Classification. We tested for each lesion the associations between the type of agreement (local and central pathologists scoring absent, local present-central absent, local absent-central present, both scoring present) with the initial clinical assessment, as well as long-term outcomes in those patients who did not receive CS/IS. Results: All glomerular lesions (M, E, C and S) assessed by local pathologists were independently associated with the decision to administer CS/IS therapy whilst the severity of tubulointerstitial lesions was not. Reproducibility between local and central pathologists was moderate for S (segmental sclerosis) and T (tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis), and poor for M (mesangial hypercellularity), E (endocapillary hypercellularity), and C (crescents). Local pathologists found statistically more of each lesion, except for the S lesion, which was more frequent with central review. Disagreements were more likely to occur when the proportion of glomeruli affected was low. The M lesion, assessed by central pathologists, correlated better with the severity of the disease at presentation and discriminated better with outcomes. By contrast, the E lesion, evaluated by local pathologists, correlated better with the clinical presentation and outcomes compared to central review. Both C and S lesions, when discordant between local and central pathologists, had a clinical phenotype intermediate to double absent lesions (milder disease) and double present (more severe). Conclusion: We conclude that differences in the scoring of MEST-C criteria between local pathologists and central reviewer have a significant impact on the prognostic value of the Oxford Classification. Since the decision to offer immunosuppressive therapy in this cohort was intimately associated with the MEST-C score, this study indicates a need for a more detailed guidance for pathologists in the scoring of IgAN biopsies