Phase 2 study of retifanlimab (INCMGA00012) in patients (pts) with selected solid tumors (POD1UM-203).

International audience2571 Background: Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are an effective treatment (tx) for many tumor types. Retifanlimab, an investigational humanized anti–PD-1 monoclonal antibody, has shown safety, pharmacology, and clinical activity consistent with the class. POD1UM-203 (NCT03679767) assessed efficacy and safety of retifanlimab in pts with selected solid tumors where CPI monotherapy is highly active. Methods: Eligible pts (≥18 y) had tx-naïve metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with high PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score ≥50%), cisplatin ineligible locally-advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer (UC) with PD-L1 expression (combined positive score ≥10%), unresectable/metastatic melanoma, or tx-naïve locally advanced/metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Measurable disease (RECIST v1.1) was required. ECOG PS >1 and prior PD-1/PD-L1 directed tx were exclusions. Retifanlimab was administered as an IV infusion at 500 mg every 4 wks over 30 min. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Results: A total of 121 pts (35 melanoma, 23 NSCLC, 29 UC, 34 RCC) received ≥1 dose of retifanlimab and were included in the analyses. Median duration of tx was 169 d (range, 1–442). The efficacy cut-off for the primary analysis occurred once all pts had been followed for at least 6 mo from the time of initial tx. Confirmed RECIST v1.1 responses were observed in all tumor types (Table) and were consistent with published ORR for other CPIs; median DOR was not reached for any tumor cohort and tx was ongoing at the time of data cutoff for 17, 11, 9, and 15 pts with melanoma, NSCLC, UC, and RCC, respectively. The most common tx-emergent AEs (TEAEs, >10% incidence) were asthenia (17.4%), arthralgia (14.9%), decreased appetite (14.0%), pruritus (12.4%), rash (10.7%), and urinary tract infection (10.7%); majority of TEAEs were low grade (≤ grade 2) and none led to tx discontinuation. Immune-related AEs occurred in 23 pts (19.0%), most common (>1% incidence) were hypothyroidism (7.4%), rash (4.1%), hyperthyroidism (2.5%), and pruritus (1.7%). Immune-related AEs led to dose delay in 5 pts (4.1%), but none led to tx discontinuation and/or dose interruption. Conclusions: Retifanlimab demonstrated antitumor activity and was generally well-tolerated in pts with melanoma, NSCLC, UC, or RCC comparable with approved CPIs for these tumor types. These results support ongoing further development of retifanlimab. Clinical trial information: NCT03679767. [Table: see text

Trilaciclib prior to chemotherapy reduces the usage of supportive care interventions for chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in patients with small cell lung cancer: Pooled analysis of three randomized phase 2 trials.

BACKGROUND: Supportive care interventions used to manage chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression (CIM), including granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs), erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, are burdensome to patients and associated with greater costs to health care systems. We evaluated the utilization of supportive care interventions and their relationship with the myeloprotective agent, trilaciclib. METHODS: Data were pooled from three independent randomized phase 2 clinical trials of trilaciclib or placebo administered prior to chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). The impact of supportive care on the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN), occurrence of severe neutropenia (SN), and occurrence of RBC transfusions on/after week 5 was analyzed across cycles 1-4. Concordance and association between grade 3/4 anemia, RBC transfusions on/after week 5, and ESA administration was also evaluated. RESULTS: The use of G-CSFs, ESAs, or RBC transfusions on/after week 5 was significantly lower among patients receiving trilaciclib versus placebo (28.5% vs. 56.3%, p \u3c 0.0001; 3.3% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.0254; and 14.6% vs. 26.1%, p = 0.0252, respectively). Compared with placebo, trilaciclib significantly reduced DSN and SN, irrespective of G-CSF administration. RBC transfusions and ESAs were most often administered in patients with grade 3/4 anemia; however, patients typically received RBC transfusions over ESA administration. CONCLUSIONS: By improving CIM and reducing the need for associated supportive care, trilaciclib has the potential to reduce the burden of myelosuppression on patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for the treatment of ES-SCLC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02499770; NCT03041311; NCT02514447)

Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for PD-L1–positive non–small-cell lung cancer

<b>Background</b>\ud \ud Pembrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against programmed death 1 (PD-1) that has antitumor activity in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with increased activity in tumors that express programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). \ud \ud <b>Methods</b>\ud \ud In this open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 305 patients who had previously untreated advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 expression on at least 50% of tumor cells and no sensitizing mutation of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene or translocation of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene to receive either pembrolizumab (at a fixed dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks) or the investigator's choice of platinum-based chemotherapy. Crossover from the chemotherapy group to the pembrolizumab group was permitted in the event of disease progression. The primary end point, progression-free survival, was assessed by means of blinded, independent, central radiologic review. Secondary end points were overall survival, objective response rate, and safety. \ud \ud <b>Results</b>\ud \ud Median progression-free survival was 10.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.7 to not reached) in the pembrolizumab group versus 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.2 to 6.2) in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.68; P<0.001). The estimated rate of overall survival at 6 months was 80.2% in the pembrolizumab group versus 72.4% in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for death, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.89; P=0.005). The response rate was higher in the pembrolizumab group than in the chemotherapy group (44.8% vs. 27.8%), the median duration of response was longer (not reached [range, 1.9+ to 14.5+ months] vs. 6.3 months [range, 2.1+ to 12.6+]), and treatment-related adverse events of any grade were less frequent (occurring in 73.4% vs. 90.0% of patients), as were grade 3, 4, or 5 treatment-related adverse events (26.6% vs. 53.3%). \ud \ud <b>Conclusions</b> \ud \ud In patients with advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 expression on at least 50% of tumor cells, pembrolizumab was associated with significantly longer progression-free and overall survival and with fewer adverse events than was platinum-based chemotherapy

Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy for Squamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

International audienceStandard first-line therapy for metastatic, squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is platinum-based chemotherapy or pembrolizumab (for patients with programmed death ligand 1 [PD-L1] expression on ≥50% of tumor cells). More recently, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was shown to significantly prolong overall survival among patients with nonsquamous NSCLC

Buparlisib plus fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer progressing on or after mTOR inhibition (BELLE-3): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

International audienceActivation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway occurs frequently in breast cancer that is resistant to endocrine therapy. Approved mTOR inhibitors effectively inhibit cell growth and proliferation but elicit AKT phosphorylation via a feedback activation pathway, potentially leading to resistance to mTOR inhibitors. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of buparlisib plus fulvestrant in patients with advanced breast cancer who were pretreated with endocrine therapy and mTOR inhibitors