18 research outputs found
Baby-talk y designaciones infantiles en el contexto de lectura de libros
El estudio de las diferencias individuales en la adquisición del lenguaje ha recibido diversos tratamientos desde que Nelson (1973) estableció la dis- tinción referencial versus expresivo. Asi, otros términos (nominal versus pro- nominal; analítico versus gestáltico o cognitivo versus pragmático) se han incorporado a la terminologia para designar el mismo fenomeno. Brevemente, algunos niños, conocidos como expresivos, tienden a utilizar su primer lenguaje con propósitos sociales, empleando un elevado número de pronom- bres y fórmulas, mientras que otros, descritos como referenciales, emplean un gran número de sustantivos, nombres propios, etc., con fines analíticos antes que pragmáticos
Recommended from our members
POSEIDON Trial Phase 1b Results: Safety, Efficacy and Circulating Tumor DNA Response of the Beta Isoform-Sparing PI3K Inhibitor Taselisib (GDC-0032) Combined with Tamoxifen in Hormone Receptor Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients.
PURPOSE: The strategy of combining endocrine therapy with PI3K-mTOR inhibition has shown promise in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, but new agents and combinations with a better therapeutic index are urgently needed. Taselisib is a potent, selective, beta-isoform-sparing PI3 kinase inhibitor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 30 patients with ER-positive, metastatic breast cancer who had failed prior endocrine therapy were treated with escalating doses of taselisib (2 or 4 mg in an intermittent or continuous schedule) combined with tamoxifen 20 mg once daily in this phase 1b study using a "rolling six" design. RESULTS: Taselisib combined with tamoxifen was generally well tolerated, with treatment-emergent adverse events as expected for this class of drugs, including diarrhea (13 patients, 43%), mucositis (10 patients, 33%), and hyperglycemia (8 patients, 27%). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Objective responses were seen in 6 of 25 patients with RECIST-measurable disease (ORR 24%). Median time to disease progression was 3.7 months. Twelve of 30 patients (40%) had disease control for 6 months or more. Circulating tumor (ct)DNA studies using next-generation tagged amplicon sequencing identified early indications of treatment response and mechanistically relevant correlates of clinical drug resistance (e.g., mutations in KRAS, ERBB2) in some patients. CONCLUSIONS: Taselisib can be safely combined with tamoxifen at the recommended phase 2 dose of 4 mg given once daily on a continuous schedule. Preliminary evidence of antitumor activity was seen in both PIK3CA mutant and wild-type cancers. The randomized phase 2 part of POSEIDON (testing tamoxifen plus taselisib or placebo) is currently recruiting
Severity-adjusted evaluation of liver transplantation on health outcomes in urea cycle disorders
Purpose: Liver transplantation (LTx) is performed in individuals with urea cycle disorders when medical management (MM) insufficiently prevents the occurrence of hyperammonemic events. However, there is a paucity of systematic analyses on the effects of LTx on health-related outcome parameters compared to individuals with comparable severity who are medically managed. Methods: We investigated the effects of LTx and MM on validated health-related outcome parameters, including the metabolic disease course, linear growth, and neurocognitive outcomes. Individuals were stratified into “severe” and “attenuated” categories based on the genotype-specific and validated in vitro enzyme activity. Results: LTx enabled metabolic stability by prevention of further hyperammonemic events after transplantation and was associated with a more favorable growth outcome compared with individuals remaining under MM. However, neurocognitive outcome in individuals with LTx did not differ from the medically managed counterparts as reflected by the frequency of motor abnormality and cognitive standard deviation score at last observation. Conclusion: Whereas LTx enabled metabolic stability without further need of protein restriction or nitrogen-scavenging therapy and was associated with a more favorable growth outcome, LTx—as currently performed—was not associated with improved neurocognitive outcomes compared with long-term MM in the investigated urea cycle disorders.</p
Long-term effects of medical management on growth and weight in individuals with urea cycle disorders
Low protein diet and sodium or glycerol phenylbutyrate, two pillars of recommended long-term therapy of individuals with urea cycle disorders (UCDs), involve the risk of iatrogenic growth failure. Limited evidence-based studies hamper our knowledge on the long-term effects of the proposed medical management in individuals with UCDs. We studied the impact of medical management on growth and weight development in 307 individuals longitudinally followed by the Urea Cycle Disorders Consortium (UCDC) and the European registry and network for Intoxication type Metabolic Diseases (E-IMD). Intrauterine growth of all investigated UCDs and postnatal linear growth of asymptomatic individuals remained unaffected. Symptomatic individuals were at risk of progressive growth retardation independent from the underlying disease and the degree of natural protein restriction. Growth impairment was determined by disease severity and associated with reduced or borderline plasma branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) concentrations. Liver transplantation appeared to have a beneficial effect on growth. Weight development remained unaffected both in asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals. Progressive growth impairment depends on disease severity and plasma BCAA concentrations, but cannot be predicted by the amount of natural protein intake alone. Future clinical trials are necessary to evaluate whether supplementation with BCAAs might improve growth in UCDs
Baby-talk y designaciones infantilesen el contexto de lectura de libros
Este artículo estudia las diferencuas individuales que aparecen en dos díadas: adulto-niño, referencial y adulto-niño expresivo en el contexto de 'lectura de libros'. Las sesiones, realizadas en casa de los sujetos, fueron grabadas en vídeo y reflejan las interacciones espontáneas madre-niño desde los primeros meses de vida hasta los dos años. Los resultados muestran que la distinción referencial/expresivo no depende de la cantidad de rutinasde atención conjunta sino en la calidad de dichas interacciones. Sugerimos el término de 'práctica educativas familiares' para comprender las relaciones entre la conducta lingüística del adulto y la orientación del primer lenguaje infantil. También discutimos sus implicaicones en relación a una teoría sobre la adquisición del lenguaje
Baby-talk y designaciones infantiles en el contexto de lectura de libros
El estudio de las diferencias individuales en la adquisición del lenguaje ha recibido diversos tratamientos desde que Nelson (1973) estableció la dis- tinción referencial versus expresivo. Asi, otros términos (nominal versus pro- nominal; analítico versus gestáltico o cognitivo versus pragmático) se han incorporado a la terminologia para designar el mismo fenomeno. Brevemente, algunos niños, conocidos como expresivos, tienden a utilizar su primer lenguaje con propósitos sociales, empleando un elevado número de pronom- bres y fórmulas, mientras que otros, descritos como referenciales, emplean un gran número de sustantivos, nombres propios, etc., con fines analíticos antes que pragmáticos
Expected medium and long term impact of the COVID-19 outbreak in oncology
Background: The ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and ensuing coronavirus disease
(COVID-19) is challenging cancer care and services worldwide.
Methods: A 95 items survey was distributed worldwide by 20 oncologists from 10 of the most affected countries in order to evaluate the impact on organization of oncological care.
Results: 109 representatives from oncology centers in 18 countries (62.4% academic hospitals) filled out the survey (June 17 e July 14, 2020). A swab or gargle test is systematically performed before day care unit or overnight stay admissions in 27.5% and 58.7% of the centers, respectively. A local registry (64.2%) and systematic tracing (77.1%) of infected patients was organized in many centers. Treatment modalities mostly affected by the pandemic (cancellation/delay) were surgery (44.1%) and chemotherapy (25.7%). Earlier cessation of palliative treatment was observed in 32.1% of centers, and 64.2 % of participants agree that under-treatment is a major concern. At the pandemic peak, teleconsultations were performed for follow-up (94.5%), for oral therapy (92.7%), but also for patients receiving immunotherapy (57.8%) or chemotherapy (55%). Approximately 82% of participants estimate that they will continue to use telemedicine. Most participants reported more frequent use of virtual tumor boards (82%) and oncological team meetings (92%), but 45% disagree that virtual meetings are an acceptable alternative to live international meetings. Although 60.9% report reduced clinical activity during the pandemic peak, only 28.4% had an increased scientific activity. Only 18% of participants estimate that their wellbeing will not recover to previous levels by the end of the year; 63% indicate easily accessible psychological support for caregivers, but only 10% used or planned to use it. All clinical trial activities are or will soon be reactivated in 72.5% of the centers. Major study protocol violations/deviations were observed in 27.5% and significant reductions of clinical trial activities are expected by 37% of centers this year.
Conclusions: COVID-19 has a major impact on organization of patient care, well-being of caregivers, continued medical education and clinical trial activities in oncology
Expected medium and long term impact of the COVID-19 outbreak in oncology
Background: The ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and ensuing coronavirus disease
(COVID-19) is challenging cancer care and services worldwide.
Methods: A 95 items survey was distributed worldwide by 20 oncologists from 10 of the most affected countries in order to evaluate the impact on organization of oncological care.
Results: 109 representatives from oncology centers in 18 countries (62.4% academic hospitals) filled out the survey (June 17 e July 14, 2020). A swab or gargle test is systematically performed before day care unit or overnight stay admissions in 27.5% and 58.7% of the centers, respectively. A local registry (64.2%) and systematic tracing (77.1%) of infected patients was organized in many centers. Treatment modalities mostly affected by the pandemic (cancellation/delay) were surgery (44.1%) and chemotherapy (25.7%). Earlier cessation of palliative treatment was observed in 32.1% of centers, and 64.2 % of participants agree that under-treatment is a major concern. At the pandemic peak, teleconsultations were performed for follow-up (94.5%), for oral therapy (92.7%), but also for patients receiving immunotherapy (57.8%) or chemotherapy (55%). Approximately 82% of participants estimate that they will continue to use telemedicine. Most participants reported more frequent use of virtual tumor boards (82%) and oncological team meetings (92%), but 45% disagree that virtual meetings are an acceptable alternative to live international meetings. Although 60.9% report reduced clinical activity during the pandemic peak, only 28.4% had an increased scientific activity. Only 18% of participants estimate that their wellbeing will not recover to previous levels by the end of the year; 63% indicate easily accessible psychological support for caregivers, but only 10% used or planned to use it. All clinical trial activities are or will soon be reactivated in 72.5% of the centers. Major study protocol violations/deviations were observed in 27.5% and significant reductions of clinical trial activities are expected by 37% of centers this year.
Conclusions: COVID-19 has a major impact on organization of patient care, well-being of caregivers, continued medical education and clinical trial activities in oncology