Will Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) be the Primary Therapy for Aortic Stenosis?

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is increasingly used for the treatment of high or very high surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) or failing surgical bioprosthesis (valve-in-valve, VIV-TAVR). In TAVR, the collapsed transcatheter heart valve (THV) is introduced using the delivery system inserted from the femoral artery (preferred) or other alternative accesses (transapical, transaortic, transcarotid, subclavian/transinnominate or transcaval). The delivery system is then advanced until coaxially aligned with the aortic annulus, where the THV is deployed. This procedure can be associated with complications such as access site injury (vascular complication), paravalvar leak, cerebrovascular events and conduction disturbances. However, the rapid acceptance and successes observed with TAVR have been made possible through careful patient selection, preprocedural planning (i.e. MDCT annular sizing), THV technology (i.e. new generation valves), and procedural techniques (i.e. minimalist TF-TAVR and alternative percutaneous access options), as well as a decrease in complications as TAVR experience grows. Though the results or ongoing clinical trials evaluating TAVR in intermediate surgical risk patients are pending, it is likely that TAVR will soon be approved for lower risk patients as well

Will Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) be the Primary Therapy for Aortic Stenosis?

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is increasingly used for the treatment of high or very high surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) or failing surgical bioprosthesis (valve-in-valve, VIV-TAVR). In TAVR, the collapsed transcatheter heart valve (THV) is introduced using the delivery system inserted from the femoral artery (preferred) or other alternative accesses (transapical, transaortic, transcarotid, subclavian/transinnominate or transcaval). The delivery system is then advanced until coaxially aligned with the aortic annulus, where the THV is deployed. This procedure can be associated with complications such as access site injury (vascular complication), paravalvar leak, cerebrovascular events and conduction disturbances. However, the rapid acceptance and successes observed with TAVR have been made possible through careful patient selection, preprocedural planning (i.e. MDCT annular sizing), THV technology (i.e. new generation valves), and procedural techniques (i.e. minimalist TF-TAVR and alternative percutaneous access options), as well as a decrease in complications as TAVR experience grows. Though the results or ongoing clinical trials evaluating TAVR in intermediate surgical risk patients are pending, it is likely that TAVR will soon be approved for lower risk patients as well

Characteristics and Outcomes of Pulmonary Angioplasty With or Without Stenting for Sarcoidosis-Associated Pulmonary Hypertension: Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis

Background: Pulmonary angioplasty has been performed in patients with sarcoidosis-associated pulmonary hypertension (SAPH) but most evidence comes from case reports and small case series. Overall outcomes remain unclear. We conducted an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of baseline, procedural, and outcome data of pulmonary angioplasty in patients with SAPH. Methods: We performed searches and systematically reviewed references from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov, and grey literature. We included IPD of patients who underwent pulmonary angioplasty for SAPH. Those without definitive diagnosis of sarcoidosis or with other causes of pulmonary vascular stenosis or compression were excluded. Results: Of 1293 screened references, 7 were included. IPD was obtained for 17 patients (median age 60 (55-65) years; 82.4% female); most of whom were Scadding stages III or IV and had NYHA FC III or IV. All patients with documented changes in 6-minute-walk distance (6MWD) had a significant improvement that ranged from 12.6 to 102.4% (P < 0.01). There were no deaths during a median follow-up of 6 (3-18) months. Conclusions: Pulmonary angioplasty with or without stenting of focal stenosis or compressions of pulmonary vessels may lead to significant improvement in 6MWD in patients with SAPH. However, this study had a small sample and some methodological limitations, such as analysis mostly of case reports and series. Randomized controlled clinical trials and/or large multicenter registry studies are needed to provide higher evidence in this topic

Long or redundant leaflet complicating transcatheter mitral valve replacement: Case vignettes that advocate for removal or reduction of the anterior mitral leaflet

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) procedures can be an alternative to surgical valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with bioprosthetic mitral valves, annuloplasty rings, or severe mitral annular calcification (MAC). TMVR can trigger acute left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction from permanent displacement of the native anterior mitral leaflet toward the left ventricular septum, more often among patients undergoing valve-in-ring and valve-in-MAC procedures. Although acute LVOT obstruction is well described in the literature, there are important additional complications of TMVR related to the length and/or redundancy of the anterior mitral valve that have been recognized after mitral valve surgery and have not been previously reported in the setting of TMVR. These additional complications include acute mitral regurgitation secondary to prolapsing native leaflet through the TMVR, frozen TMVR leaflet secondary to overhanging native leaflet and late LVOT obstruction in the neo-LVOT secondary to long native leaflet. Preprocedural planning with imaging (echocardiography and computed tomography) and measurement of anterior mitral leaflet length is critical important in understanding the risk for these complications. As transcatheter mitral valve technology proliferates, interactions with the anterior mitral leaflet after TMVR may be more frequent than initially anticipated. We believe that there is no advantage to an intact anterior leaflet and advocate removal or reduction of the leaflet prior to TMVR. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc

Long or redundant leaflet complicating transcatheter mitral valve replacement: Case vignettes that advocate for removal or reduction of the anterior mitral leaflet

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) procedures can be an alternative to surgical valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with bioprosthetic mitral valves, annuloplasty rings, or severe mitral annular calcification (MAC). TMVR can trigger acute left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction from permanent displacement of the native anterior mitral leaflet toward the left ventricular septum, more often among patients undergoing valve-in-ring and valve-in-MAC procedures. Although acute LVOT obstruction is well described in the literature, there are important additional complications of TMVR related to the length and/or redundancy of the anterior mitral valve that have been recognized after mitral valve surgery and have not been previously reported in the setting of TMVR. These additional complications include acute mitral regurgitation secondary to prolapsing native leaflet through the TMVR, frozen TMVR leaflet secondary to overhanging native leaflet and late LVOT obstruction in the neo-LVOT secondary to long native leaflet. Preprocedural planning with imaging (echocardiography and computed tomography) and measurement of anterior mitral leaflet length is critical important in understanding the risk for these complications. As transcatheter mitral valve technology proliferates, interactions with the anterior mitral leaflet after TMVR may be more frequent than initially anticipated. We believe that there is no advantage to an intact anterior leaflet and advocate removal or reduction of the leaflet prior to TMVR. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc