Analysis of harmonic current interaction in an industial plant

An analysis of current transients caused by the operation of a nearby device in an industrial plant is presented in the paper. The source of current transients in the factory lighting system was traced to the operation of the nearby six-pulse AC/DC converter. To determine the nature of the interaction, a measurement was done with a storage oscilloscope. Also, laboratory experiments on one lamp were conducted. It was possible to exclude the presence of a parallel resonance on this site. It was concluded that transients are caused by voltage notches in certain working regimes of the six-pulse converter. Possible solutions to the problem are separating the supplies of the converter and the lighting installation, filtering, or adding additional line reactance

Selectivity of F-18-FLT and F-18-FDG for differentiating tumor from inflammation in a rodent model

Increased glucose metabolism of inflammatory tissues is the main source of false-positive F-18-FDG PET findings in oncology. It has been suggested that radiolabeled nucleosides might be more tumor specific. Methods: To test this hypothesis, we compared the biodistribution of 3'-deoxy-3'-F-18-fluorothymidine (FLT) and F-18-FDG in Wistar rats that bore tumors (C6 rat glioma in the right shoulder) and also had sterile inflammation in the left calf muscle (induced by injection of 0.1 mL of turpentine). Twenty-four hours after turpentine injection, the rats received an intravenous bolus (30 MBq) of either F-18-FLT (n = 5) or F-18-FDG (n = 5). Pretreatment of the animals with thymidine phosphorylase (>1,000 U/kg, intravenously) before injection of F-18-FLT proved to be necessary to reduce the serum levels of endogenous thymidine and achieve satisfactory tumor uptake of radioactivity. Results: Tumor-to-muscle ratios of F-18-FDG at 2 h after injection (13.2 +/- 3.0) were higher than those of F-18-FLT (3.8 +/- 1.3). F-18-FDG showed high physiologic uptake in brain and heart, whereas F-18-FLT was avidly taken up by bone marrow. F-18-FDG accumulated in the inflamed muscle, with 4.8 +/- 1.2 times higher uptake in the affected thigh than in the contralateral healthy thigh, in contrast to F-18-FLT, for which this ratio was not significantly different from unity (1.3 +/- 0.4). Conclusion; In F-18-FDG PET images, both tumor and inflammation were visible, but F-18-FLT PET showed only the tumor. Thus, the hypothesis that F-18-FLT has a higher tumor specificity was confirmed in our animal model

Selectivity of F-18-FLT and F-18-FDG for differentiating tumor from inflammation in a rodent model

Increased glucose metabolism of inflammatory tissues is the main source of false-positive F-18-FDG PET findings in oncology. It has been suggested that radiolabeled nucleosides might be more tumor specific. Methods: To test this hypothesis, we compared the biodistribution of 3'-deoxy-3'-F-18-fluorothymidine (FLT) and F-18-FDG in Wistar rats that bore tumors (C6 rat glioma in the right shoulder) and also had sterile inflammation in the left calf muscle (induced by injection of 0.1 mL of turpentine). Twenty-four hours after turpentine injection, the rats received an intravenous bolus (30 MBq) of either F-18-FLT (n = 5) or F-18-FDG (n = 5). Pretreatment of the animals with thymidine phosphorylase (>1,000 U/kg, intravenously) before injection of F-18-FLT proved to be necessary to reduce the serum levels of endogenous thymidine and achieve satisfactory tumor uptake of radioactivity. Results: Tumor-to-muscle ratios of F-18-FDG at 2 h after injection (13.2 +/- 3.0) were higher than those of F-18-FLT (3.8 +/- 1.3). F-18-FDG showed high physiologic uptake in brain and heart, whereas F-18-FLT was avidly taken up by bone marrow. F-18-FDG accumulated in the inflamed muscle, with 4.8 +/- 1.2 times higher uptake in the affected thigh than in the contralateral healthy thigh, in contrast to F-18-FLT, for which this ratio was not significantly different from unity (1.3 +/- 0.4). Conclusion; In F-18-FDG PET images, both tumor and inflammation were visible, but F-18-FLT PET showed only the tumor. Thus, the hypothesis that F-18-FLT has a higher tumor specificity was confirmed in our animal model

Sorting lung tumor volumes from 4D-MRI data using an automatic tumor-based signal reduces stitching artifacts

PURPOSE: To investigate whether a novel signal derived from tumor motion allows more precise sorting of 4D-magnetic resonance (4D-MR) image data than do signals based on normal anatomy, reducing levels of stitching artifacts within sorted lung tumor volumes. METHODS: (4D-MRI) scans were collected for 10 lung cancer patients using a 2D T2-weighted single-shot turbo spin echo sequence, obtaining 25 repeat frames per image slice. For each slice, a tumor-motion signal was generated using the first principal component of movement in the tumor neighborhood (TumorPC1). Signals were also generated from displacements of the diaphragm (DIA) and upper and lower chest wall (UCW/LCW) and from slice body area changes (BA). Pearson r coefficients of correlations between observed tumor movement and respiratory signals were determined. TumorPC1, DIA, and UCW signals were used to compile image stacks showing each patient's tumor volume in a respiratory phase. Unsorted image stacks were also built for comparison. For each image stack, the presence of stitching artifacts was assessed by measuring the roughness of the compiled tumor surface according to a roughness metric (Rg). Statistical differences in weighted means of Rg between any two signals were determined using an exact permutation test. RESULTS: The TumorPC1 signal was most strongly correlated with superior-inferior tumor motion, and had significantly higher Pearson r values (median 0.86) than those determined for correlations of UCW, LCW, and BA with superior-inferior tumor motion (p < 0.05). Weighted means of ratios of Rg values in TumorPC1 image stacks to those in unsorted, UCW, and DIA stacks were 0.67, 0.69, and 0.71, all significantly favoring TumorPC1 (p = 0.02-0.05). For other pairs of signals, weighted mean ratios did not differ significantly from one. CONCLUSION: Tumor volumes were smoother in 3D image stacks compiled using the first principal component of tumor motion than in stacks compiled with signals based on normal anatomy

Porphyrin a as a precursor of heme a in Candida utilis

Background: An increased risk of major congenital abnormalities after IVF and ICSI has been described, but underlying mechanisms are unclear. This study evaluates the effects of ovarian hyperstimulation, the in vitro procedure and time to pregnancy (TTP) - as proxy for the severity of subfertility - on the prevalence of dysmorphic features. Design/methods: Participants were singletons born following controlled ovarian hyperstimulation-IVF/ICSI (COH-IVF/ICSI; n = 66), or modified natural cycle-IVF/ICSI (MNC-IVF/ICSI; n = 56), or to subfertile couples who conceived naturally (Sub-NC; n = 86). Dysmorphic features were assessed according to the method of Merks et al., and are classified into 'minor variants' (minor anomalies or common variants) and 'abnormalities' (clinically relevant or irrelevant abnormalities). We focussed on minor anomalies as they indicate altered embryonic development and because they have the advantage of a higher prevalence. Results: The prevalences of any of the outcome measures were similar in the three groups. One or more minor anomalies, our primary outcome measure, occurred in 50% of COH-IVFACSI, 54% of MNC-IVF/ICSI and 53% of Sub-NC children. TTP in years was significantly associated with abnormalities (adjusted0R= 120; 95%CI = 1.02-1.40). especially with clinically relevant abnormalities (adjustedOR = 1.22; 95%CI = 1.01-1.48). Conclusions: The study indicates that ovarian hyperstimulation and the in vitro procedure are not associated with an increase in dysmorphic features. The positive association between TTP and clinically relevant abnormalities suggests a role of the underlying subfertility and its determinants in the genesis of dysmorphic features. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ireland Lt

Determining the genome-wide kinship coefficient seems unhelpful in distinguishing consanguineous couples with a high versus low risk for adverse reproductive outcome

Background: Offspring of consanguineous couples are at increased risk of congenital disorders. The risk increases as parents are more closely related. Individuals that have the same degree of relatedness according to their pedigree, show variable genomic kinship coefficients. To investigate whether we can differentiate between couples with high- and low risk for offspring with congenital disorders, we have compared the genomic kinship coefficient of consanguineous parents with a child affected with an autosomal recessive disorder with that of consanguineous parents with only healthy children, corrected for the degree of pedigree relatedness. Methods: 151 consanguineous couples (73 cases and 78 controls) from 10 different ethnic backgrounds were genotyped on the Affymetrix platform and passed quality control checks. After pruning SNPs in linkage disequilibrium, 57,358 SNPs remained. Kinship coefficients were calculated using three different toolsets: PLINK, King and IBDelphi, yielding five different estimates (IBDelphi, PLINK (all), PLINK (by population), King robust (all) and King homo (by population)). We performed a one-sided Mann Whitney test to investigate whether the median relative difference regarding observed and expected kinship coefficients is bigger for cases than for controls. Furthermore, we fitted a mixed effects linear model to correct for a possible population effect. Results: Although the estimated degrees of genomic relatedness with the different toolsets show substantial variability, correlation measures between the different estimators demonstrated moderate to strong correlations. Controls have higher point estimates for genomic kinship coefficients. The one-sided Mann Whitney test did not show any evidence for a higher median relative difference for cases compared to controls. Neither did the regression analysis exhibit a positive association between case–control status and genomic kinship coefficient. Conclusions: In this case–control setting, in which we compared consanguineous couples corrected for degree of pedigree relatedness, a higher degree of genomic relatedness was not significantly associated with a higher likelihood of having an affected child. Further translational research should focus on which parts of the genome and which pathogenic mutations couples are sharing. Looking at relatedness coefficients by determining genome-wide SNPs does not seem to be an effective measure for prospective risk assessment in consanguineous parents