90 research outputs found
Health-Related Quality of Life in the Gender, Race, And Clinical Experience Trial
Background. We report health-related QoL (HRQoL) from GRACE (Gender, Race, And Clinical Experience) study by sex and race over 48 weeks. Methods. 429 treatment-experienced adults (HIV-1 RNA ≥ 1000 copies/mL) received darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg twice daily plus an appropriate background regimen. QoL was measured by the Functional Assessment of HIV Infection (FAHI) questionnaire. Results. 67% women and 77% men, including 67.4% black, 76.0% Hispanic, and 73.8% white patients, completed the trial. Baseline total FAHI scores were similar between sexes and races. Total FAHI of the entire population improved by Week 4 (P < .05); near-maximum changes obtained by Week 12 were maintained through Week 48. Women and black patients demonstrated larger improvements in total FAHI versus men, and Hispanic and white patients, respectively. Conclusion. HRQoL improved in all sex and racial/ethnic groups. Sex-based and race-based differences in improvements in FAHI subscales may provide insight into subtle differences of HIV-1 and treatment on HRQoL in different populations
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Darunavir and Etravirine in HIV-1–Infected, Treatment-Experienced Patients in the Gender, Race, and Clinical Experience (GRACE) Trial
Objectives. Evaluation of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of darunavir and etravirine among HIV-1–infected, treatment-experienced adults from GRACE, by sex and race.
Methods. Patients received darunavir/ritonavir 600/100mg twice daily plus other antiretrovirals, which could include etravirine 200mg twice daily. Population pharmacokinetics for darunavir and etravirine were determined over 48 weeks and relationships assessed with virologic response and safety. Rich sampling for darunavir, etravirine, and ritonavir was collected in a substudy at weeks 4, 24, and 48.
Results. Pharmacokinetics were estimated in 376 patients for darunavir and 190 patients for etravirine. Median darunavir AUC12h and C0h were 60,642ng·h/mL and 3624ng/mL, respectively; and for etravirine were 4183ng · h/mL and 280ng/mL, respectively. There were no differences in darunavir or etravirine AUC12h or C0h by sex or race. Age, body weight, or use of etravirine did not affect darunavir exposure. No relationships were seen between darunavir pharmacokinetics and efficacy or safety. Patients with etravirine exposure in the lowest quartile generally had lower response rates. Rich sampling showed no time-dependent relationship for darunavir, etravirine, or ritonavir exposure over 48 weeks. Conclusions. Population pharmacokinetics showed no relevant differences in darunavir or etravirine exposure by assessed covariates. Lower etravirine exposures were associated with lower response rates
Evaluation of the efficacy of pimavanserin in the treatment of agitation and aggression in patients with Alzheimer's disease psychosis: a post hoc analysis
This is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this recordObjectives
Patients with Alzheimer's disease psychosis (ADP) commonly experience concomitant agitation and aggression. We investigated whether a reduction in ADP following pimavanserin treatment conferred a reduction in associated agitation and aggression.
Methods
ACP‐103‐019 was a 12‐week, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study that evaluated the efficacy of pimavanserin (34 mg) in reducing psychotic symptoms in patients with ADP. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory‐Nursing Home Version‐Psychosis Score (NPI‐NH‐PS) at week six. A post hoc analysis examined whether there was a greater reduction in agitation and aggression (NPI‐NH domain C [agitation/aggression] and Cohen‐Mansfield Agitation Inventory‐Short Form [CMAI‐SF]) in pimavanserin‐treated patients who experienced a reduction of hallucinations and delusions (psychosis responders defined as ≥50% reduction from baseline in NPI‐NH‐PS, week six) when compared with those who did not (nonresponders).
Results
Pimavanserin‐treated patients with ≥50% response in psychotic symptoms (n = 44) showed a greater improvement in agitation and aggression symptoms on the NPI‐NH domain C (week six, least squares mean [LSM] difference = −3.64, t = −4.69, P < .0001) and the CMAI‐SF (week six, LSM difference = −3.71, t = −2.01, P = .0483) than nonresponders (n = 32). Differences between psychosis responders and nonresponders were also observed in patients with more severe agitation and aggression at baseline on the NPI‐NH domain C (responders, n = 26; nonresponders, n = 13; week six, LSM difference = −3.03, t = −2.44, P = .019).
Conclusions
Patients with ADP, who show improvement in psychotic symptoms after pimavanserin treatment, also experience an improvement in concomitant agitation and aggression.ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (San Diego, CA
Efficacy results of pimavanserin from a multi-center, open-label extension study in Parkinson's disease psychosis patients
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.Introduction: Pimavanserin, a selective 5-HT2A inverse agonist/antagonist, was approved for hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP). We present durability of response with pimavanserin in patients with PDP for an additional 4 weeks of treatment.
Methods: This was an open-label extension (OLE) study in patients previously completing one of three double-blind, placebo-controlled (Core) studies. All patients received pimavanserin 34 mg once daily. Efficacy assessments included the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) PD and H + D scales, Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Improvement and Severity scales and Caregiver Burden Scale (CBS), through 4 weeks in the OLE. Safety assessments were conducted at each visit.
Results: Of 459 patients, 424 (92.4%) had a Week 4 efficacy assessment. At Week 4 (10 weeks total treatment), SAPS-PD mean (standard deviation) change from OLE baseline was -1.8 (5.5) and for SAPS-H + D was -2.1 (6.2) with pimavanserin 34 mg. Patients receiving placebo during the Core studies had greater improvements (SAPS-PD -2.9 [5.6]; SAPS-H + D -3.5 [6.3]) during the OLE. For participants treated with pimavanserin 8.5 or 17 mg during the Core studies, further improvement was observed during the OLE with pimavanserin 34 mg. The mean change from Core Study baseline for SAPS-PD score was similar among prior pimavanserin 34 mg and prior placebo-treated participants (-7.1 vs. -7.0). The CGI-I response rate (score of 1 or 2) at Week 4 was 51.4%. Adverse events were reported by 215 (46.8%) patients during the first 4 weeks of OLE. The most common AEs were fall (5.9%), hallucination (3.7%), urinary tract infection (2.8%), insomnia (2.4%), and peripheral edema (2.2%) CONCLUSIONS: Patients previously on pimavanserin 34 mg during three blinded core studies had durability of efficacy during the subsequent 4 week OLE SAPS-PD assessment. Patients previously on blinded placebo improved after 4 weeks of OL pimavanserin treatment. These results in over 400 patients from 14 countries support the efficacy of pimavanserin for treating PDP.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio
Outcomes in Older Versus Younger Patients Over 96 Weeks in HIV-1– Infected Patients Treated with Rilpivirine or Efavirenz in ECHO and THRIVE
- …