Therapeutic strategies under development targeting inflammatory mechanisms in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurological disease characterized by the progressive loss of cortical, bulbar, and spinal motor neurons (MNs). The cardinal manifestation of ALS is a progressive paralysis which leads to death within a time span of 3 to 5 years after disease onset. Despite similar final output of neuronal death, the underlying pathogenic causes are various and no common cause of neuronal damage has been identified to date. Inflammation-mediated neuronal injury is increasingly recognized as a major factor that promotes disease progression and amplifies the MN death-inducing processes. The neuroimmune activation is not only a physiological reaction to cell-autonomous death but is an active component of nonautonomous cell death. Such injury-perpetuating phenomenon is now proved to be a common mechanism in many human disorders characterized by progressive neurodegeneration. Therefore, it represents an interesting therapeutic target. To date, no single cell population has been proved to play a major role. The existing evidence points to a complex cross talk between resident immune cells and nonresident cells, like monocytes and T lymphocytes, and to a dysregulation in cytokine profile and in phenotype commitment. After a summary of the most important mechanisms involved in the inflammatory reaction in ALS, this review will focus on novel therapeutic tools that rely on tackling inflammation to improve motor function and survival. Herein, completed, ongoing, or planned clinical trials, which aim to modify the rapidly fatal course of this disease, are discussed. Anti-inflammatory compounds that are currently undergoing preclinical study and novel suitable molecular targets are also mentioned

Surgeons’ practice and preferences for the anal fissure treatment: results from an international survey

The best nonoperative or operative anal fissure (AF) treatment is not yet established, and several options have been proposed. Aim is to report the surgeons' practice for the AF treatment. Thirty-four multiple-choice questions were developed. Seven questions were about to participants' demographics and, 27 questions about their clinical practice. Based on the specialty (general surgeon and colorectal surgeon), obtained data were divided and compared between two groups. Five-hundred surgeons were included (321 general and 179 colorectal surgeons). For both groups, duration of symptoms for at least 6 weeks is the most important factor for AF diagnosis (30.6%). Type of AF (acute vs chronic) is the most important factor which guide the therapeutic plan (44.4%). The first treatment of choice for acute AF is ointment application for both groups (59.6%). For the treatment of chronic AF, this data is confirmed by colorectal surgeons (57%), but not by the general surgeons who prefer the lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) (31.8%) (p = 0.0001). Botulin toxin injection is most performed by colorectal surgeons (58.7%) in comparison to general surgeons (20.9%) (p = 0.0001). Anal flap is mostly performed by colorectal surgeons (37.4%) in comparison to general surgeons (28.3%) (p = 0.0001). Fissurectomy alone is statistically significantly most performed by general surgeons in comparison to colorectal surgeons (57.9% and 43.6%, respectively) (p = 0.0020). This analysis provides useful information about the clinical practice for the management of a debated topic such as AF treatment. Shared guidelines and consensus especially focused on operative management are required to standardize the treatment and to improve postoperative results