5 research outputs found

    Early dural reaction to polylactide in cranial defects in rabbits

    No full text
    Restoring the bone integrity to injured calvariae remains a challenge to surgeons. In this study, the dural biocompatibility of biodegradable poly-L/DL-lactide 80/20 and 70/30 defect covers, designed for guided bone regeneration, was assessed. In each of the 16 test rabbits, bilateral (8.3 mm) cranial defects were created. The different covers were applied to one defect each in every rabbit and consisted of three parts: an epicranial cover, a spacer, and a dural cover. All defects had closed after 8 weeks due to new bone formation. A few giant cells were found at the cover-to-dura interface in equal numbers for both covers. Dural bone formation was present in 15 of 16 rabbits and progressed unhindered by the defect cover or its early degradation products

    Fibula Graft Cutting Devices : Are 3D-Printed Cutting Guides More Precise than a Universal, Reusable Osteotomy Jig?

    No full text
    Individual cutting guides for the reconstruction of lower jaw defects with fibular grafts are often used. However, the application of these osteotomy tools is costly and time intensive. The aim of this study was to compare the precision of osteotomies using a 3D-printed guide with those using a universal, reusable, and more cost-efficient Multi-Use Cutting Jig (MUC-Jig). In this non-blinded experimental study, 10 cranio-maxillofacial surgeons performed four graft removals each in a randomized order using the same osteotomy angle, both proximally (sagittal cut) and distally (coronal cut), of a graft (45°, 30°, 15°, or 0°), first with the MUC-Jig then with the 3D-printed cutting guide. The 40 fibula transplants (Tx) of each method (n = 80) were then analyzed concerning their Tx length and osteotomy angles and compared to the original planning data. Furthermore, the surgeons' subjective perception and the duration of the two procedures were analyzed. The mean relative length and mean relative angle deviation between the MUC-Jig (-0.08 ± 1.12 mm; -0.69° ± 3.15°) and the template (0.22 ± 0.90 mm; 0.36° ± 2.56°) group differed significantly (p = 0.002; p = < 0.001), but the absolute deviations did not (p = 0.206; p = 0.980). Consequently, clinically comparable osteotomy results can be achieved with both methods, but from an economic point of view the MUC-Jig is a more cost-efficient solution

    A simple, effective, universal, and reusable osteotomy tool for jaw reconstructions with microvascular fibula transplants

    No full text
    Precise, expensive individual saw guides are used with increasing frequency for the reconstruction of mandibular defects with fibular grafts. In this report, an alternative is presented - the Multiuse Cutting Jig (MUC-Jig, proprietary development). It is reusable, suitable for all patients, requires simple planning based on conventional CT imaging, and is more economical.; To investigate its precision, we conducted a nonblinded experimental study, with ten participating craniomaxillofacial surgeons. Osteotomies of four different fibula segments were carried out at the same angulation, with groups defined according to the proximal and distal fixed angulation: 45°, 30°, 15°, or 0°. The sagittal cut was performed proximally, with the coronal cut performed distally. The resulting 40 segments (n = 40) were analyzed with their Tx length (primary endpoint) and osteotomy angles, and compared to the original planning.; The mean (SD) relative deviation of all grafts from the original planning was -0.08 mm (1.12) in length and -0.71° (3.15) for the angle. Only 45° (-2.04 ± 3.71°) and 30° (-1.07 ± 2.52°) cuts differed significantly (p < 0.05) from smaller angle grafts. The mean (SD) absolute deviation was 0.81 mm (0.27) in length and 2.13° (0.93) in graft angles. For individual transplants, 45° cuts (1.28 ± 1.03 mm) differed significantly (p < 0.005) from others. We observed no differences in relative length or absolute angle deviation.; The MUC-Jig is precise and cost-effective for osteotomies with medium angles and smooth reconstructions of template-guided procedures
    corecore