20 research outputs found
ΠΠΠΠ‘ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠβΠΠΠ£Π§ΠΠΠβΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠΠ«,βΠΠΠ’Π£ΠΠΠ¬ΠΠΠ‘Π’ΠβΠ’ΠΠΠ«,β ΠΠΠͺΠΠΠ’ΠβΠβΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠ’ΠβΠΠ‘Π‘ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ―
It is shown how in the beginning the researchers correctly identified the urgency of the chosen direction, the wording threads object, and the subject of research and other methodological characteristics of scientific work. The concept of βscientific problemβ cannot be identified with the concept of βthe issueβ, as is sometimes done. Relevance of the topic determined by the need of practice, the novelty and significance of the results of the study. The wording should reflect the theme of its relevance, rather than the direction of the study. It should be deleted in the title of the research topic the banal words βstudyβ, βimprovementβ, etc., which provides a priori features of scientific activity and focuses on the completeness of the work, both in scientific and practical terms. Do not set a clear object; the researcher can prevent rough methodological errors that lead to errors in acquiring new knowledge and the development of research results in practice. By category of research on agricultural mechanization subject of study is the identification of patterns of unknown relationships, dependencies interaction of working bodies of art.ΠΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π² Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π»Π΅ ΠΏΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΡΡΡ Ρ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ Π²ΡΠ±ΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ, ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°, ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ. ΠΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ Β«Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡΒ» Π½Π΅Π»ΡΠ·Ρ ΠΎΡΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Β«Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΒ», ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΡΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° Π΄Π΅Π»Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ. ΠΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ, Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅ΠΌΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. Π€ΠΎΡΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠ° ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ½Π° ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ°ΡΡ Π΅Ρ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ, Π° Π½Π΅ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΠΈΡΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΡ Π² Π½Π°Π·Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ Π±Π°Π½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ»ΠΎΠ² Β«ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅Β», Β«ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅Β» ΠΈ Ρ.βΠΏ., ΡΡΠΎ Π°ΠΏΡΠΈΠΎΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΠΌΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ Π½Π΅ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅Ρ Π½Π° Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π² Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½Π΅. ΠΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ² ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡ, ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π΄ΠΎΠΏΡΡΡΠΈΡΡ Π³ΡΡΠ±ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ±ΠΊΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄ΡΡ ΠΊ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ±ΠΊΠ°ΠΌ Π² ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
Π·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅. ΠΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ
ΠΎΠ·ΡΠΉΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ, Π½Π΅ΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π΅ΠΉ, Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΎΠ² ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΈ
ΠΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ΅Ρ Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ° Π·Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±Π°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠ²
Dynamics of grain crops productivity in the main grain growing regions of Siberian Federal District is presented. Major factors shoud be considered at justification of a class of combine harvesters for their effective operation in various climatic and working conditions. loading efficiency of a combine thresher depends on productivity and operating width of windrowers or headers at straight-cutting and windrowing. A tailings maintenance in the threshed grain heap influences on the harvester capacity. Certificate capacity of combines of a class of 5-12 kg/s at the 1.5 percent admissible level of losses behind a combine thresher is depending on the tailings maintenance in the threshed grain heap. In accordance to analysis the capacity of combines of any class of the classical design increases by 1.45 times at reduction of a straw content from 1.5 to 0.7 relative to standard indicators, and decreases by 1.16 times at increase of this parameter to 2.3. The combine of a class of 7 kg/s is completely loaded when pickup threshing by harvesters with a operating width of 20; 16 and 12 m at a speed of movement 7.2; 9.0 and 12.0 km/h respectively. The combine of a class of 10 kg/s at crop productivity of 1.8 t/ha will be completely loaded when pickup threshing if the operating width is 20 m and the speed equals 12 km/h, and at the width of 16 m speed has to make 13 km/h. The content of the technological certificate by the example of use of combines of a class of 7 kg/s (GS-07) and 10 kg/s (GS-10) is proved. The algorithm of determination of the movement speed is presented. Its use provides certificate loading of a thresher when threshing of grain crops with different productivity at straight-cutting and windrowing.ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π° Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ° ΡΡΠΎΠΆΠ°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π·Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡ Π² ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
Π·Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Ρ
Π‘ΠΈΠ±ΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΊΡΡΠ³Π°. ΠΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΡ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠ° Π·Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±Π°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠ², ΡΡΠΎΠ±Ρ ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΌ Π² ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎ-ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
. ΠΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π° ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½Ρ Π·Π°Π³ΡΡΠ·ΠΊΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±Π°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠ² Π² Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡ ΡΡΠΎΠΆΠ°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Ρ Π·Π°Ρ
Π²Π°ΡΠ° Π²Π°Π»ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΆΠ°ΡΠΎΠΊ ΠΈ Ρ
Π΅Π΄Π΅ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΡΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ΅. ΠΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π΅Π·Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ Π² ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠΎΠ»Π°ΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ Ρ
Π»Π΅Π±Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠΏΡΡΠΊΠ½ΡΡ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±Π°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠ². ΠΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Ρ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΏΡΡΠΊΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±Π°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠ² ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠ° 5-12 ΠΊΠ³/Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠΏΡΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡ Π·Π° ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±Π°ΠΉΠ½Π° 1,5 ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° Π² Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡ ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π΅Π·Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ Π² ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π΅ ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠΎΠ»Π°ΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ Ρ
Π»Π΅Π±Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡ. Π‘ΠΎΠ³Π»Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΌ, ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΡΠΈ Ρ 1,5 Π΄ΠΎ 0,7 Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΏΡΡΠΊΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±Π°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠ² Π»ΡΠ±ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠ° ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡ
Π΅ΠΌΡ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ°Π΅Ρ Π² 1,45 ΡΠ°Π·Π°, Π° ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π΄ΠΎ 2,3 Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Ρ ΡΡΠΎΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π² 1,16 ΡΠ°Π·Π°. ΠΠΎΠΌΠ±Π°ΠΉΠ½ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠ° 7 ΠΊΠ³/Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ Π·Π°Π³ΡΡΠΆΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠ΅ Π²Π°Π»ΠΊΠΎΠ², ΡΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΆΠ°ΡΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Ρ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π·Π°Ρ
Π²Π°ΡΠ° 20, 16 ΠΈ 12 ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ 7,2; 9,0 ΠΈ 12,0 ΠΊΠΌ/Ρ. ΠΠΎΠΌΠ±Π°ΠΉΠ½ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠ° 10 ΠΊΠ³/Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΆΠ°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ 18 Ρ/Π³Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ Π±ΡΠ΄Π΅Ρ Π·Π°Π³ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠ΅ Π²Π°Π»ΠΊΠΎΠ², ΡΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π΅ Π·Π°Ρ
Π²Π°ΡΠ° 20 ΠΌ ΠΈ ΡΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΈ 12 ΠΊΠΌ/Ρ, Π° ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π΅ Π·Π°Ρ
Π²Π°ΡΠ° 16 ΠΌ ΡΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ½Π° ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΡΡ 13 ΠΊΠΌ/Ρ. ΠΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ° Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±Π°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠ² ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠ° 7 ΠΊΠ³/Ρ (GS-07) ΠΈ 10 ΠΊΠ³/Ρ (GS-10). ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ½ΡΡ Π·Π°Π³ΡΡΠ·ΠΊΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΠΊΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠ΅ Π·Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΠΆΠ°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΡΠΌΡΠΌ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ
Recommended from our members
An assessment of upper ocean salinity content from the ocean reanalyses inter-comparison project (ORA-IP)
Many institutions worldwide have developed ocean reanalyses systems (ORAs) utilizing a variety of ocean models and assimilation techniques. However, the quality of salinity reanalyses arising from the various ORAs has not yet been comprehensively assessed. In this study, we assess the upper ocean salinity content (depth-averaged over 0β700 m) from 14 ORAs and 3 objective ocean analysis systems (OOAs) as part of the Ocean Reanalyses Intercomparison Project. Our results show that the best agreement between estimates of salinity from different ORAs is obtained in the tropical Pacific, likely due to relatively abundant atmospheric and oceanic observations in this region. The largest disagreement in salinity reanalyses is in the Southern Ocean along the Antarctic circumpolar current as a consequence of the sparseness of both atmospheric and oceanic observations in this region. The West Pacific warm pool is the largest region where the signal to noise ratio of reanalysed salinity anomalies is >1. Therefore, the current salinity reanalyses in the tropical Pacific Ocean may be more reliable than those in the Southern Ocean and regions along the western boundary currents. Moreover, we found that the assimilation of salinity in ocean regions with relatively strong ocean fronts is still a common problem as seen in most ORAs. The impact of the Argo data on the salinity reanalyses is visible, especially within the upper 500m, where the interannual variability is large. The increasing trend in global-averaged salinity anomalies can only be found within the top 0β300m layer, but with quite large diversity among different ORAs.
Beneath the 300m depth, the global-averaged salinity anomalies from most ORAs switch their trends from a slightly growing trend before 2002 to a decreasing trend after 2002. The rapid switch in the trend is most likely an artefact of the dramatic change in the observing system due to the implementation of Argo
On Solving Statistical Problems for the Stochastic Processes by the Sufficient Empirical Averaging Method
A problem of the statistical estimation of stochastic process functionals
is considered. The sufficient empirical averaging method is used. The
method requires the existence of the complete sufficient statistics for unknown
parameters. Some examples are considered
Justification of working out of combine harvesters technological certificate
Dynamics of grain crops productivity in the main grain growing regions of Siberian Federal District is presented. Major factors shoud be considered at justification of a class of combine harvesters for their effective operation in various climatic and working conditions. loading efficiency of a combine thresher depends on productivity and operating width of windrowers or headers at straight-cutting and windrowing. A tailings maintenance in the threshed grain heap influences on the harvester capacity. Certificate capacity of combines of a class of 5-12 kg/s at the 1.5 percent admissible level of losses behind a combine thresher is depending on the tailings maintenance in the threshed grain heap. In accordance to analysis the capacity of combines of any class of the classical design increases by 1.45 times at reduction of a straw content from 1.5 to 0.7 relative to standard indicators, and decreases by 1.16 times at increase of this parameter to 2.3. The combine of a class of 7 kg/s is completely loaded when pickup threshing by harvesters with a operating width of 20; 16 and 12 m at a speed of movement 7.2; 9.0 and 12.0 km/h respectively. The combine of a class of 10 kg/s at crop productivity of 1.8 t/ha will be completely loaded when pickup threshing if the operating width is 20 m and the speed equals 12 km/h, and at the width of 16 m speed has to make 13 km/h. The content of the technological certificate by the example of use of combines of a class of 7 kg/s (GS-07) and 10 kg/s (GS-10) is proved. The algorithm of determination of the movement speed is presented. Its use provides certificate loading of a thresher when threshing of grain crops with different productivity at straight-cutting and windrowing
QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT AND QUALIFICATIONS RATING IN THE LAND MANAGEMENT SPHERE
The aim of the research is to observe the existing approaches to qualifications framework development in the sphere of land management, cadastres and real estate management, as well as the qualifications framework adaptation to European system. The relevance of the issue is related to the specific professional and institutional problems facing Russian educational establishments engaged in personnel training in the given sphere. The authors demonstrate the qualifications framework development in the land management sector regarding it as a key mechanism of educational mobility and the router for knowledge acquisition and updates. The qualifications framework is referred to as a systematic and structured description of recognized qualifications. The accepted worldwide methodology of organizing the educational process and quality control system is given. The emphasis is on the need to comply the qualifications framework with the Russian State Educational Standards
Qualifications framework development and qualifications rating in the land management sphere
The aim of the research is to observe the existing approaches to qualifications framework development in the sphere of land management, cadastres and real estate management, as well as the qualifications framework adaptation to European system. The relevance of the issue is related to the specific professional and institutional problems facing Russian educational establishments engaged in personnel training in the given sphere. The authors demonstrate the qualifications framework development in the land management sector regarding it as a key mechanism of educational mobility and the router for knowledge acquisition and updates. The qualifications framework is referred to as a systematic and structured description of recognized qualifications. The accepted worldwide methodology of organizing the educational process and quality control system is given. The emphasis is on the need to comply the qualifications framework with the Russian State Educational StandardsΠ¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ β ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΡ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΊ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΊΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΠΊ Π² ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ Π·Π΅ΠΌΠ»Π΅ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΡΠ²Π°, ΠΊΠ°Π΄Π°ΡΡΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΈ ΠΈΡ
Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΊ Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΠΉΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΊΠ°ΠΌ ΠΊΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ. ΠΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΆΠ΄Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π° Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, Π·Π°Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ°Π΄ΡΠΎΠ² Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΡ, Π² ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π² Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΊΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ Ρ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ°. ΠΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠ»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ (ΠΠΠ ), ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ°Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ΅, ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°Π²Π°Π΅ΠΌΡΡ
ΠΊΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ, ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ², ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΡΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡΡΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ. ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ°Ρ Π² ΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΠΎ-ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ° ΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°. ΠΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±Π°ΡΡΠ²Π°Π΅ΠΌΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΊΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ½Ρ Π±ΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Ρ ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΠ° Π
The local ensemble transform Kalman filter and the running-in-place algorithm applied to a global ocean general circulation model
The most widely used methods of data assimilation in large-scale
oceanography, such as the Simple Ocean Data Assimilation (SODA) algorithm,
specify the background error covariances and thus are unable to refine the
weights in the assimilation as the circulation changes. In contrast, the
more computationally expensive Ensemble Kalman Filters (EnKF) such as the
Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter (LETKF) use an ensemble of model
forecasts to predict changes in the background error covariances and thus
should produce more accurate analyses. The EnKFs are based on the
approximation that ensemble members reflect a Gaussian probability
distribution that is transformed linearly during the forecast and analysis
cycle. In the presence of nonlinearity, EnKFs can gain from replacing each
analysis increment by a sequence of smaller increments obtained by
recursively applying the forecast model and data assimilation procedure over
a single analysis cycle. This has led to the development of the "running in
place" (RIP) algorithm by Kalnay and Yang (2010) and Yang et al. (2012a,b) in
which the weights computed at the end of each analysis cycle are used
recursively to refine the ensemble at the beginning of the analysis cycle.
To date, no studies have been carried out with RIP in a global domain with
real observations.
<br><br>
This paper provides a comparison of the aforementioned assimilation methods
in a set of experiments spanning seven years (1997β2003) using identical
forecast models, initial conditions, and observation data. While the
emphasis is on understanding the similarities and differences between the
assimilation methods, comparisons are also made to independent ocean station
temperature, salinity, and velocity time series, as well as ocean
transports, providing information about the absolute error of each.
Comparisons to independent observations are similar for the assimilation
methods but the observation-minus-background temperature differences are
distinctly lower for LETKF and RIP. The results support the potential for
LETKF to improve the quality of ocean analyses on the space and timescales
of interest for seasonal prediction and for RIP to accelerate the spin up of
the system