8 research outputs found

    Evaluation of a new random-access HBV DNA molecular assay: The VERIS HBV assay.

    No full text
    International audienceDetection and quantification of HBV DNA are essential to diagnose chronic HBV infection, monitor the virological response to treatment and the possible selection of resistant viruses in order to tailor therapy. The VERIS/MDx System HBV Assay is a random-access system that quantifies HBV DNA in clinical samples using unique single sample and reagent access during the workflow process without the need to reload other tests and delivers results within 1.2h following sampling.The goal of this study was to evaluate the analytical performance of the VERIS HBV assay for HBV DNA detection and quantification in clinical samples from a series of patients chronically infected with different HBV genotypes.The specificity of the VERIS HBV assay was estimated to be over 99.5%. The limit of detection (LOD) was estimated to be 4.1IU/mL (95%CI: 3.20-5.90IU/mL). Using an HBV linearity panel and controls (Seracare LifeScience), intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation ranged from 0.12% to 3.64% and from 1.05% to 7.35%, respectively. The influence of the HBV genotype was evaluated from 120 clinical specimens containing HBV genotypes A to G tested in parallel with the VERIS HBV assay and the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HBV v2.0 assay. A linear relationship between the HBV DNA levels measured with both assays was found. A modest bias of HBV DNA levels was observed in the VERIS assay as compared to CAP/CTM HBV v2.0 in most of the samples tested (mean VERIS minus CAP/CTM difference: -0.395 log IU/mL). Overall, the VERIS HBV assay is well suited to monitoring clinical HBV DNA levels in infected patients according to current clinical practice guidelines

    : RDT for HBsAg detectio

    No full text
    International audienceBACKGROUND: Rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) have been developed for the detection of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). They represent a promising alternative to enzyme immunoassays and a powerful tool for large-scale screening and diagnosis of HBV infection, especially in regions without easy access to serological and molecular testing. OBJECTIVES: The aims of the present study were to evaluate the characteristics and clinical performance of a new CE-marked HBsAg RDT, DRW-HBsAg v2.0 assay (Diagnostics for the Real World™, Ltd., USA), in various patient populations, including those chronically infected with HBV, patients with severe acute hepatitis of unknown origin and pregnant women with unknown HBV serological status at delivery. RESULTS: The lower limit of detection of the assay, evaluated in 21 clinical samples, ranged from 0.30±0.07 to 0.97±0.26 international units/mL (using Abbott Architect as a reference), depending on the HBV genotype. The assay tested positive in 100% of patients with chronic hepatitis B, 96.3% of HBsAg-positive acute hepatitis patients, and 95.2% of HBsAg-positive pregnant women. Its specificity was 98.8% in HBsAg-negative patients, 98.7% in HBsAg-negative patients with acute hepatitis of unknown origin and 97.8% in HBsAg-negative pregnant women. Amino acid substitutions in the HBsAg major hydrophilic region did not affect HBsAg detection by DRW-HBsAg v2.0. CONCLUSIONS: The new DRW-HBsAg v2.0 assay is a simple, rapid, easy-to-run and highly sensitive assay that can be used in both high- and low-risk populations for the diagnosis of HBsAg carriage. It appears to be a promising new tool for large-scale screening and diagnosis of HBV infection

    Performance of 30 commercial SARS-CoV-2 serology assays in testing symptomatic COVID-19 patients

    No full text
    International audienceWe report evaluation of 30 assays' (17 rapid tests (RDTs) and 13 automated/manual ELISA/CLIA assay (IAs)) clinical performances with 2594 sera collected from symptomatic patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR on a respiratory sample, and 1996 pre-epidemic serum samples expected to be negative. Only 4 RDT and 3 IAs fitted both specificity (> 98%) and sensitivity (> 90%) criteria according to French recommendations. Serology may offer valuable information during COVID-19 pandemic, but inconsistent performances observed among the 30 commercial assays evaluated, which underlines the importance of independent evaluation before clinical implementation

    Human Fetal Cell Therapy in Huntington's Disease: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II Trial

    No full text
    International audienceBackground: Huntington s disease is a ' rare, severe, inherited neurodegenerative disease in which we assessed the safety and efficacy of grafting human fetal ganglionic eminence intrastriatally. Methods: Patients at the early stage of the di sease were enrolled in the Multicentric Intracerebral Grafting in Huntington's Disease trial, a delayed-start phase II randomized study. After a run-in period of 12 m onths, patients were randomized at month 12 to either the treatment group (transplanted at month 13-mo nth 14) or the control group and secondarily treated 20 months later (month 33-month 34). The primary outcome was total motor score compared between both groups 20 months postrandomization (month 32). Secondary outcomes i ncluded clinical, imaging, and electrophysiological findings and a comparison of pregraft and p ostgraft total motor score slopes durin g th e entire study period (month 0-month 52) regardless of the time of transplant. Results: Of 54 randomized patients, 45 were transplanted; 26 immediately (treatment) and 19 delayed (control). Mean total motor score at month 32 did not differ between groups (treated controls difference in means adjusted for M12: +2.9 [95% confidence interval, −2.8 to 8.6]; = 0.31). Its rate of decline after transplan-P tation was similar to that before transplantation. A total of 27 severe adverse events were recorded in the randomized patients, 10 of which were related to the transplant procedure. Improvement of procedures during the trial significantly decreased the frequency of surgical events.We found antihuman leucocytes antigen antibodies in 40% of the patients. Conclusion: No clinical benefit was found in this trial. This may have been related to graft rejection. Ectopia and high track number negatively influence the graft outcome. Procedural adjustments substantially improved surgical safety. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00190450
    corecore