305 research outputs found
Professional Development as a Speech-Language Pathology Intervention: Does it Improve Child Language and Early Literacy Skills?
The years before a child enters school can be a pivotal time of language and literacy development. Language and early literacy skills in early childhood are important determining factors of later life outcomes. Unfortunately, many children living in areas of social disadvantage begin formal schooling with language and early literacy skills substantially behind their peers and, without suitable intervention, are unlikely to catch-up.
The overall purpose of the thesis was to explore whether a public health, evidence-based language and literacy-based PD intervention, facilitated by SLPs, improved educator and preschooler outcomes.
Specific aims were to
1. Investigate if early childhood educators used language and literacy-promoting behaviours more frequently following completion of the intervention (Paper 1)
2. Explore if preschoolersâ language and early literacy skills, as reported by their early childhood educators and parents/carers, improved after the PD intervention (Paper 1)
3. Determine if preschoolersâ language and early literacy skills improved after the intervention as shown by objective, standardised measures (Paper 2)
4. Investigate if the intervention resulted in improved language and early literacy outcomes for preschoolers with low language ability (Paper 3)
5. To find out if any specific preschooler characteristics predicted improvement in language and early literacy skills following the intervention (Paper 3
Recommended from our members
Pilot study of fascia Bowen therapy for 8-11 year-old boys with developmental coordination disorder
Background: Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD), also known as dyspraxia, is characterised by motor skill impairments. The motor difficulties often produce negative effects in other areas of life, such as poor self-esteem and reduced social interactions. One treatment used for DCD is fascia Bowen therapy, which involves stimulating the fascia tissues of the body using finger and thumb rolling movements over the skin to improve overall muscle movement. However, no studies to date have been reported testing the effectiveness of fascia Bowen in DCD.
Methods: The present pilot study tested the effectiveness of 6 weeks of fascia Bowen in 10 boys aged 8-11 years with DCD. None of the boys had ever received treatment in any form before this study. Motor skills were assessed using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2) and the DCD questionnaire, and psycho-social functioning was measured using the Self-Perception Profile, Spence Social Skills Questionnaire, and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. All measures of interest were assessed before and after the therapy.
Results: Results showed significant improvement in motor function post-intervention, with 60% of the children no longer clinically being classified as having a movement difficulty on the MABC-2. However, no significant improvements were seen in psycho-social measures.
Conclusions: The current pilot study revealed improvements in motor functioning after fascia Bowen therapy across both performance and questionnaire measures, but improvements did not extend to wider areas. Further research in DCD is needed testing fascia Bowen in larger studies with expanded ages and both genders over longer periods
Effectiveness of preformed foot orthoses in reducing lower limb pain, swollen and tender joints and in improving quality of life and gait parameters in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a randomised controlled trial (Protocol)
Trial registration number This clinical trial has
been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical
Trials Registry: ACTRN12616001082493p. Ethics for
this randomised controlled trial has been approved
(16/09/21/4.03).Background Many children and adolescents with
juvenile idiopathic arthritis experience lower limb problems
which may lead to physical disabilities significantly
impacting on their quality of life and symptoms. Emerging
evidence has identified the effective role of podiatry in the
management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis, suggesting the
clinical benefit of different orthotic therapies.
Methods This study will be a parallel-group designed,
multicentre, randomised controlled trial, aiming to recruit
66 children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis
aged between 5 and 18 years. Those recruited will need
to be diagnosed according to the International League of
Associations for Rheumatology criteria, and present with
lower limb joint pain, swelling and/or tenderness. Participants
will be recruited from three outpatient hospital clinics in New
South Wales, Australia. Participants will be randomly allocated
to receive a trial or control intervention. The trial group will be
prescribed a customised preformed foot orthoses; instead,
the control group will receive a flat 1 mm insole with no
corrective modifications. Primary outcome measure recorded
will be pain. Secondary outcomes will be quality of life, foot
disability, swollen and tender joint count and gait parameters
(such as plantar pressures, walking speed, stance and swing
time). The allocated foot orthoses will be worn for 12 months,
with data collected at baseline, 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months
intervals. Group allocation will be concealed and all analyses
will be carried out on an intention to treat.
Discussion The purpose of this trial is to explore
the efficacy of a cost-effective, non-invasive podiatric
intervention that will be prescribed at the initial
biomechanical consultation. This approach will promote
early clinical intervention, which is the gold standard in
paediatric rheumatology. Furthermore, this study has the
potential to provide new evidence for the effectiveness
of a mechanical intervention alone to reduce swollen and
tender joints in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.sch_pod1pub5056pub
âLupus means sacrificesâ â the perspectives of adolescents and young adults with systemic lupus erythematosus.
Background: Disease activity, organ damage and treatment burden are often substantial in children and adolescents with systemic lupus erythematous (SLE), and the complex interplay among the developing child, their parents, and their peers makes effective management difficult. We aimed to describe the experiences and perspectives of adolescents and young adults diagnosed with juvenile-onset SLE to inform strategies for improving treatment and health outcomes. Methods: Focus groups and face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 patients aged 14 to 26 years, from five Australian hospitals in 2013-2014. Focus groups and interview transcripts were thematically analyzed. Results: Five themes were identified: marring identity (misrepresented self, heightened self-consciousness, sense of isolation); restricting major life decisions (narrowed career options, threat to parenthood); multifaceted confusion and uncertainty (frustration of delayed or misdiagnosis, needing age and culturally appropriate information, ambiguity about cause of symptoms, prognostic uncertainty, confronting transition to adult care); resentment of long-term treatment (restricting ambition, animosity towards medication use); gaining resilience (desire for independence, developing self-reliance, recalibrating perceived disease severity, depending on family, trusting physicians). Conclusions: Young patients with SLE perceive they have substantially limited physical and social capacities and restricted personal and career goals. Psychosocial and educational interventions targeted at improving confidence, self-efficacy, disease-related knowledge, social support, and resolving insecurities regarding patientsâ capacity for self-management may alleviate psychosocial distress, improve adherence, and thus optimize health outcomes of adolescents and young adults with SLE.DJT is funded by a postgraduate scholarship from the Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney. All authors have no relevant financial affiliations that would cause a conflict of interes
The relationship between hip abductor muscle strength and iliotibial band tightness in individuals with low back pain
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Shortening of the iliotibial band (ITB) has been considered to be associated with low back pain (LBP). It is theorized that ITB tightness in individuals with LBP is a compensatory mechanism following hip abductor muscle weakness. However, no study has clinically examined this theory. The purpose of this study was to investigate the muscle imbalance of hip abductor muscle weakness and ITB tightness in subjects with LBP.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A total of 300 subjects with and without LBP between the ages of 20 and 60 participated in this cross-sectional study. Subjects were categorized in three groups: LBP with ITB tightness (n = 100), LBP without ITB tightness (n = 100) and no LBP (n = 100). Hip abductor muscle strength was measured in all subjects.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) with the body mass index (BMI) as the covariate revealed significant difference in hip abductor strength between three groups (P < 0.001). Post hoc analysis showed no significant difference in hip abductor muscle strength between the LBP subjects with and without ITB tightness (P = 0.59). However, subjects with no LBP had significantly stronger hip abductor muscle strength compared to subjects with LBP with ITB tightness (P < 0.001) and those with LBP without ITB tightness (P < 0.001).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The relationship between ITB tightness and hip abductor weakness in patients with LBP is not supported as assumed in theory. More clinical studies are needed to assess the theory of muscle imbalance of hip abductor weakness and ITB tightness in LBP.</p
Defective protein prenylation is a diagnostic biomarker of mevalonate kinase deficiency
Contains fulltext :
177329.pdf (Publisherâs version ) (Open Access
Physical examination tool for swollen and tender lower limb joints in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A pilot diagnostic accuracy study
From MDPI via Jisc Publications RouterDerek Santos - ORCID: 0000-0001-9936-715X
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9936-715XBackground: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common rheumatic disease in children, with lower limb involvement highly prevalent. Recent evidence has highlighted the lack of specific lower limb physical examination (PE) tools for clinicians assisting the paediatric rheumatology team in identifying lower extremity disease in patients with JIA. Early clinical detection may lead to more prompt and targeted interventions to reduce lower limb problems in children with JIA. The aim of this pilot study is to provide preliminary data on the diagnostic accuracy of a lower limb PE tool in JIA. Methods: Children with JIA requiring magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on their lower limb joints per their usual care were eligible. Lower limb joint counts were conducted clinically by a podiatrist and paediatric rheumatologist using the proposed twenty joint per side, PE tool. The PE were compared to MRI assessments completed by two independent paediatric radiologists. Data were analysed using agreement (observed, positive and negative) and Cohenâs kappa with 95% CIs. Results: Fifteen participants were recruited into the study in which 600 lower limb joints were clinically examined. Statistical analysis showed excellent inter-rater reliability between podiatrist and paediatric rheumatologist for both joint swelling and tenderness. Results of the intra-rater reliability of the podiatrist using the PE tool indicated excellent percentage agreements (98.5â100%) and substantial kappa coefficients (0.93â1). The inter-rater reliability between radiological assessments contrasted the PE results, showing low agreement and poor reliability. Comparisons between PE and MRI resulted in poor kappa coefficients and low agreement percentages. The most agreeable joint between MRI and PE was the ankle joint, while the worst performing joint was the sub-talar joint. Conclusion: Results indicate potential clinical reliability; however, the validity and diagnostic accuracy of the proposed PE tool remains unclear due to low kappa coefficients and inconsistent agreements between PE and MRI results. Further research will be required before the tool may be used in a clinical setting.19pubpub
Consensus-based recommendations for the management of juvenile localised scleroderma
In 2012, a European initiative called Single Hub and Access point for paediatric Rheumatology in Europe (SHARE) was launched to optimise and disseminate diagnostic and management regimens in Europe for children and young adults with rheumatic diseases. Juvenile localised scleroderma (JLS) is a rare disease within the group of paediatric rheumatic diseases (PRD) and can lead to significant morbidity. Evidence-based guidelines are sparse and management is mostly based on physicians' experience. This study aims to provide recommendations for assessment and treatment of JLS. Recommendations were developed by an evidence-informed consensus process using the European League Against Rheumatism standard operating procedures. A committee was formed, mainly from Europe, and consisted of 15 experienced paediatric rheumatologists and two young fellows. Recommendations derived from a validated systematic literature review were evaluated by an online survey and subsequently discussed at two consensus meetings using a nominal group technique. Recommendations were accepted if â„80% agreement was reached. In total, 1 overarching principle, 10 recommendations on assessment and 6 recommendations on therapy were accepted with â„80% agreement among experts. Topics covered include assessment of skin and extracutaneous involvement and suggested treatment pathways. The SHARE initiative aims to identify best practices for treatment of patients suffering from PRDs. Within this remit, recommendations for the assessment and treatment of JLS have been formulated by an evidence-informed consensus process to produce a standard of care for patients with JLS throughout Europe
- âŠ