Low Molecular Weight Heparin in Portal Vein Thrombosis of Cirrhotic Patients: Only Therapeutic Purposes?

Cirrhosis has always been regarded as hemorrhagic coagulopathy caused by the reduction in the hepatic synthesis of procoagulant proteins. However, with the progression of liver disease, the cirrhotic patient undergoes a high rate of thrombotic phenomena in the portal venous system. Although the progression of liver failure produces a reduction in the synthesis of anticoagulant molecules, a test able to detect the patients with hemostatic balance shifting towards hypercoagulability has not yet been elaborated. The need of treatment and/or prophylaxis of cirrhotic patients is demonstrated by the increased mortality, the risk of bleeding from esophageal varices, and the mortality of liver transplantation, when portal vein thrombosis (PVT) occurs even if current guidelines do not give indications about PVT treatment in cirrhosis. In view of the general feeling that the majority of cirrhotic patients at an advanced stage may be in a procoagulant condition (suggested by the sharp increase in the prevalence of PVT), it is presumable that a prophylaxis of this population could be of benefit. The safety and the efficacy of prophylaxis and treatment with enoxaparin in patients with cirrhosis demonstrated by a single paper suggest this option only in controlled trials and, currently, there are no sufficient evidences for a recommendation in the clinical practice

A case of severe transaminase elevation following a single ustekinumab dose with remission after drug withdrawal

Background: Ustekinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody which binds Interleukin (IL)-12/23. It is indicated for the treatment of moderate-severe psoriasis and active psoriatic arthritis. Few data are available about the possibility of an interaction between ustekinumab and the liver. Case Description: We reported a case of a 61-year old woman admitted to our Unit for severe transaminase elevation (aspartate transaminase 756 IU/l, alanine transaminase 1212 IU/l) occurred after a single Ustekinumab infusion for psoriasis. All other possible causes of liver damage, including drugs, hepatitis viruses, auto-antibodies and metabolic disorders were excluded. Liver biopsy showed lymphocytic infiltration, biliary duct damage and piecemeal necrosis. On the bases of the nonspecific histological picture and Rucam score, we accomplished the diagnosis of “liver injury of iatrogenic origin”. After drug withdrawal, a spontaneous normalization of liver enzymes occurred within six months

Epstein-Barr Virus-Related hyperacute hepatitis: May intravenous Ster-Oids be an effective approach?

Background: Severe acute liver failure by Epstein-Barr virus is a rare event. A specific anti-viral treatment is not available and steroid use is controversial. Objective: We report the beneficial effect of steroid therapy in this clinical condition. Case Report: We observed the case of a 19-year male patient admitted to our Gastroenterology Unit for an acute Epstein-Barr virus-related hepatitis (significant transaminase flare: aspartate transaminase x 91 and alanine transaminase x 56 the upper limit of normal, Model for End-stage Liver Disease: MELD score 14). A severe liver injury occurred about 20 days after onset (MELD score 29). A prompt drama-tic improvement of liver damage markers was achieved after eight-day methylprednisolone intravenous administration (MELD score 9) despite viral disappearance (i. e. absence of EBV-DNA in blood and nasopharyngeal swab) occurred after 6 months. Anti-EBV IgM positivity was observed at the 14th month despite presence of specific IgG (â\u80\u9cpast infection, IgM persistingâ\u80\u9d). Conclusion: Therapeutic response suggests that the short-term use of steroids, even if not recom-mended for routine treatment of infectious mononucleosis, may be effective to treat the immune-mediated symptoms. Possible steroid interactions with the host immune-response to the virus have not been demonstrated in short-term administration. Our case suggests focusing on this last topic

Long-term albumin administration in decompensated cirrhosis (ANSWER): an open-label randomised trial

Background Evidence is scarce on the efficacy of long-term human albumin (HA) administration in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. The human Albumin for the treatmeNt of aScites in patients With hEpatic ciRrhosis (ANSWER) study was designed to clarify this issue.Methods We did an investigator-initiated multicentre randomised, parallel, open-label, pragmatic trial in 33 academic and non-academic Italian hospitals. We randomly assigned patients with cirrhosis and uncomplicated ascites who were treated with anti-aldosteronic drugs (>= 200 mg/day) and furosemide (>= 25 mg/day) to receive either standard medical treatment (SMT) or SMT plus HA (40 g twice weekly for 2 weeks, and then 40 g weekly) for up to 18 months. The primary endpoint was 18-month mortality, evaluated as difference of events and analysis of survival time in patients included in the modified intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. This study is registered with EudraCT, number 2008-000625-19, and ClinicalTrials. gov, number NCT01288794.Findings From April 2, 2011, to May 27, 2015, 440 patients were randomly assigned and 431 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. 38 of 218 patients died in the SMT plus HA group and 46 of 213 in the SMT group. Overall 18-month survival was significantly higher in the SMT plus HA than in the SMT group (Kaplan-Meier estimates 77% vs 66%; p=0.028), resulting in a 38% reduction in the mortality hazard ratio (0.62 [95% CI 0.40-0.95]). 46 (22%) patients in the SMT group and 49 (22%) in the SMT plus HA group had grade 3-4 non-liver related adverse events.Interpretation In this trial, long-term HA administration prolongs overall survival and might act as a disease modifying treatment in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved