Long-term, prolonged-release tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in de novo kidney transplant recipients: 5-year prospective follow-up of the ADHERE study patients.

The objectives of this study were to assess long-term graft survival, patient survival, renal function, and acute rejections in de novo kidney transplant recipients, treated with once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus-based therapy. The study was a 5-year non-interventional prospective follow-up of patients from the ADHERE study, a Phase IV 12-month open-label assessment of patients randomized to receive prolonged-release tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (Arm 1) or sirolimus (Arm 2). From 838 patients in the randomized study, 587 were included in the long-term follow-up, of whom 510 completed the study at year 5. At 1 year post-transplant, graft and patient survival rates were 93.0% and 97.8%, respectively, and at 5 years were 84.0% and 90.8%, respectively. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed no association between graft loss, initial randomized treatment arm, donor age, donor type, or sex. The 5-year acute rejection-free survival rate was 77.4%, and biopsy-confirmed acute rejection-free survival rate was 86.0%. Renal function remained stable over the follow-up period: mean ± SD eGFR 4-variable modification diet in renal disease formula (MDRD4) was 52.3 ± 21.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 at 6 months and 52.5 ± 23.0 ml/min/1.73 m2 at 5 years post-transplant. These findings support the role of long-term once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, in combination with sirolimus or MMF, for renal transplant recipients in routine clinical practice. ispartof: TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL vol:33 issue:2 pages:161-173 ispartof: location:England status: publishe

ADHERE: randomized controlled trial comparing renal function in de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving prolonged-release tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus

ADHERE was a randomized, open-label, Phase IV study comparing renal function at Week 52 postkidney transplant, in patients who received prolongedrelease tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens. On Days 0?27, patients received prolonged-release tacrolimus (initially 0.2 mg/kg/day), corticosteroids, and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Patients were randomized on Day 28 to receive either prolonged-release tacrolimus plus MMF (Arm 1) or prolongedrelease tacrolimus (?25% dose reduction on Day 42) plus sirolimus (Arm 2). The primary endpoint was glomerular filtration rate by iohexol clearance (mGFR) at Week 52. Secondary endpoints included eGFR, creatinine clearance (CrCl), efficacy failure (patient withdrawal or graft loss), and patient/graft survival. Tolerability was analyzed. The full-analysis set comprised 569 patients (Arm 1: 287; Arm 2: 282). Week 52 mean mGFR was similar in Arm 1 versus Arm 2 (40.73 vs. 41.75 ml/min/1.73 m2; P = 0.405), as were the secondary endpoints, except composite efficacy failure, which was higher in Arm 2 versus 1 (18.2% vs. 11.5%; P = 0.002) owing to a higher postrandomization withdrawal rate due to adverse events (AEs) (14.4% vs. 5.2%). Results from this study show comparable renal function between arms at Week 52, with fewer AEs leading to study discontinuation with prolonged-release tacrolimus plus MMF (Arm 1) versus lower dose prolonged-release tacrolimus plus sirolimus (Arm 2)

Massive hemothorax after removal of subclavian vein catheter: a very unusual complication

A case of massive hemothorax developing a few minutes after removal of a central venous catheter is described in a 51-yr-old woman, who had undergone a renal transplant. The patient had an arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis on the same side as the central catheter. The mechanism of the onset of this complication is discussed. We recommend avoiding positioning a central catheter on the same side as an arm arteriovenous fistula. Furthermore, we think it is necessary to monitor patients after removal, as is usually done after positioning, to detect this potentially fatal complication

Conversion of stable kidney transplant recipients from a twice-daily to once-daily everolimus regimen.

Once-daily everolimus administration is a further option to improve compliance to immunosuppressive therapy. We randomized 23 stable kidney transplant recipients already on everolimus therapy to receive a single daily morning dose or to continue the twice-daily regimen. The everolimus levels evaluated after 2 weeks showed a slight reduction from 5.13 +/- 1.61 ng/mL at baseline to 4.76 +/- 1.61 ng/mL, which was not statistically significant. After 2 weeks we also evaluated cyclosporine (CsA) levels together with renal function parameters, neither of which showed episodes, any difference between the converted versus twice-daily groups. We did not record any adverse event, such as an infection, an acute rejection episode, or graft loss, over the 6-month study period. Single dosing of everolimus is possible and safe and may achieve better patient compliance to multiple-drug immunosuppressive therapy

Conversion of Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients from a Twice-Daily Everolimus Regimen to a Once-Daily Everolimus Regimen.

4nonenoneCarmellini M; Bernini M; Ruggieri G; Collini ACarmellini, Mario; Bernini, M; Ruggieri, Giuliana; Collini, A

Excellent long-term results in de novo renal transplant recipients treated with proliferation signal inhibitors and reduced calcineurin inhibitors exposure.

BACKGROUND: A new class of immunosuppressants, proliferation signal inhibitors (PSI)--sirolimus and everolimus--has the potential to prevent chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). This retrospective analysis reports a 6-year practice using PSI at a single center, comparing a regimen based on reduced-dose calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and PSI versus full-dose CNI and mycophenolic acid (MPA). METHODS: The study population included 70 patients (group A) who received de novo PSI therapy in combination with reduced dose of CNI, standard steroids, and basiliximab induction, and 216 patients (group B) with full-dose CNI, MPA, steroids, and basiliximab induction. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were recorded in the baseline donor and recipient characteristics. A difference was observed in cold ischemia time, which could represent a bias for the analysis. No differences were recorded in actuarial patient survival, delayed graft function, biopsy-proven acute rejection rates, and renal function analysis. A significant difference was recorded in the actuarial graft survival rate at years 2, 3, and 4 (P< .01), as well as overall graft survival rates (P= .025). DISCUSSION: The reduction of cold preservation time seemed to be an important factor to improve both short- and long-term renal function. This regimen revealed a long-term trend toward better renal function and graft survival. The use of PSI with reduced doses of CNI seems to be indicated for suboptimal grafts, especially when a reduced quality of the kidney is associated with prolonged cold ischemia time