32 research outputs found

    Odd-even effects in charge transport across n-alkanethiolate-based SAMs

    Get PDF
    This paper compares rates of charge transport across self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of n-alkanethiolates having odd and even numbers of carbon atoms (nodd and neven) using junctions with the structure MTS/SAM//Ga2O3/EGaIn (M = Au or Ag). Measurements of current density, J(V), across SAMs of n-alkanethiolates on AuTS and AgTS demonstrated a statistically significant odd-even effect on AuTS, but not on AgTS, that could be detected using this technique. Statistical analysis showed the values of tunneling current density across SAMs of n-alkanethiolates on AuTS with nodd and neven belonging to two separate sets, and while there is a significant difference between the values of injection current density, J0, for these two series (log|J0Au,even| = 4.0 ± 0.3 and log|J0Au,odd| = 4.5 ± 0.3), the values of tunneling decay constant, ÎČ, for nodd and neven alkyl chains are indistinguishable (ÎČAu,even = 0.73 ± 0.02 Å-1, and ÎČAu,odd= 0.74 ± 0.02 Å-1). A comparison of electrical characteristics across junctions of n-alkanethiolate SAMs on gold and silver electrodes yields indistinguishable values of ÎČ and J0 and indicates that a change that substantially alters the tilt angle of the alkyl chain (and, therefore, the thickness of the SAM) has no influence on the injection current density across SAMs of n-alkanethiolates

    Characterizing the Metal–SAM Interface in Tunneling Junctions

    Get PDF
    his paper investigates the influence of the interface between a gold or silver metal electrode and an n-alkyl SAM (supported on that electrode) on the rate of charge transport across junctions with structure Met(Au or Ag)TS/A(CH2)nH//Ga2O3/EGaIn by comparing measurements of current density, J(V), for Met/AR = Au/thiolate (Au/SR), Ag/thiolate (Ag/SR), Ag/carboxylate (Ag/O2CR), and Au/acetylene (Au/C≡CR), where R is an n-alkyl group. Values of J0 and ÎČ (from the Simmons equation) were indistinguishable for these four interfaces. Since the anchoring groups, A, have large differences in their physical and electronic properties, the observation that they are indistinguishable in their influence on the injection current, J0 (V = 0.5) indicates that these four Met/A interfaces do not contribute to the shape of the tunneling barrier in a way that influences J(V).Chemistry and Chemical Biolog

    Mapping mechanical properties of organic thin films by force-modulation microscopy in aqueous media

    No full text
    The mechanical properties of organic and biomolecular thin films on surfaces play an important role in a broad range of applications. Although force-modulation microscopy (FMM) is used to map the apparent elastic properties of such films with high lateral resolution in air, it has rarely been applied in aqueous media. In this letter we describe the use of FMM to map the apparent elastic properties of self-assembled monolayers and end-tethered protein thin films in aqueous media. Furthermore, we describe a simple analysis of the contact mechanics that enables the selection of FMM imaging parameters and thus yields a reliable interpretation of the FMM image contrast

    Specific Binding at the Cellulose Binding Module–Cellulose Interface Observed by Force Spectroscopy

    No full text
    The need for effective enzymatic depolymerization of cellulose has stimulated an interest in interactions between protein and cellulose. Techniques utilized for quantitative measurements of protein–cellulose noncovalent association include microgravimetry, calorimetry, and atomic force microscopy (AFM), none of which differentiate between specific protein–cellulose binding and nonspecific adhesion. Here, we describe an AFM approach that differentiates nonspecific from specific interactions between cellulose-binding modules (CBMs) and cellulose. We demonstrate that the “mismatched” interaction between murine galectin-3, a lectin with no known affinity for cellulose, and cellulose shows molecular recognition force microscopy profiles similar to those observed during the interaction of a “matched” clostridial CBM3a with the same substrate. We also examine differences in binding probabilities and rupture profiles during CBM–cellulose binding experiments in the presence and absence of a blocking agenta substrate specific for CBM that presumably blocks binding sites. By comparison of the behavior of the two proteins, we separate specific (i.e., blockable) and nonspecific adhesion events and show that both classes of interaction exhibit nearly identical rupture forces (45 pN at ∌0.4 nN/s). Our work provides an important caveat for the interpretation of protein–carbohydrate binding by force spectroscopy; delineation of the importance of such interactions to other classes of binding warrants further study

    Formation of highly ordered self-assembled monolayers of alkynes on Au(111) substrate

    No full text
    Self-assembled monolayers (SAMs), prepared by reaction of terminal n-alkynes (HC≡C(CH2)nCH3, n = 5, 7, 9, and 11) with Au(111) at 60 °C were characterized using scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy (IRRAS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and contact angles of water. In contrast to previous spectroscopic studies of this type of SAMs, these combined microscopic and spectroscopic experiments confirm formation of highly ordered SAMs having packing densities and molecular chain orientations very similar to those of alkanethiolates on Au(111). Physical properties, hydrophobicity, high surface order, and packing density, also suggest that SAMs of alkynes are similar to SAMs of alkanethiols. The formation of high-quality SAMs from alkynes requires careful preparation and manipulation of reactants in an oxygen-free environment; trace quantities of O2 lead to oxidized contaminants and disordered surface films. The oxidation process occurs during formation of the SAM by oxidation of the −C≡C– group (most likely catalyzed by the gold substrate in the presence of O2)

    Influence of the Contact Area on the Current Density across Molecular Tunneling Junctions Measured with EGaIn Top-Electrodes

    No full text
    This paper describes the relationship between the rates of charge transport (by tunneling) across self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) in a metal/SAM//Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/EGaIn junction and the geometric contact area (<i>A</i><sub>g</sub>) between the conical Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/EGaIn top-electrode and the bottom-electrode. Measurements of current density, <i>J</i>(<i>V</i>), across SAMs of decanethiolate on silver demonstrate that <i>J</i>(<i>V</i>) increases with <i>A</i><sub>g</sub> when the contact area is small (<i>A</i><sub>g</sub> < 1000 ÎŒm<sup>2</sup>), but reaches a plateau between 1000 and 4000 ÎŒm<sup>2</sup>, where <i>J</i>(0.5 V) ≈ 10<sup>–0.52±0.10</sup> A/cm<sup>2</sup>. The method used to fabricate Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/EGaIn electrodes generates a tip whose apex is thicker and rougher than its thin, smoother sides. When <i>A</i><sub>g</sub> is small, the Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/EGaIn electrode contacts the bottom-electrode principally over this rough apex and forms irreproducible areas of electrical contact. When <i>A</i><sub>g</sub> is large, the contact is through the smoother regions peripheral to the apex and is much more reproducible. Measurements of contact pressure between conical EGaIn electrodes and atomic force microscope cantilevers demonstrate that the nominal contact pressure (governed by the mechanical behavior of the oxide skin) decreases approximately inversely with the diameter of geometric contact. This self-regulation of pressure prevents damage to the SAM and makes the ratio of electrical contact area to geometric footprint approximately constant
    corecore