Taxonomia de Aphestia Schiner, 1866 (Diptera: Asilidae: Laphriinae)

Aphestia Schiner, 1866 is characterized by the escape about two times the length of the pedicel, post pedicel about 2.5 times the length of escape and pedicel together with truncate apex and also by the presence of lateral marginal macrosetae in all abdominal tergites or restricted to the first two tergites. The genus had three valid species: Aphestia annulipes (Macquart, 1838), Aphestia chalybaea von Röder, 1881 and Aphestia nigra Bigot, 1878. Five synonyms have been already proposed for the Aphestia species and the original descriptions were very succinct, ambiguous and offered few useful characters for the species identification. A taxonomic study of Aphestia was realized with the analisis of external morphological characters as well as male and female terminalia. We analyzed 367 specimens obtained through loan from many national and abroad collections. We found 11 valid species and from these, eight are new: Aphestia amazonica sp. nov.; Aphestia clausicella sp. nov.; Aphestia dicowi sp. nov.; Aphestia fisheri sp. nov.; Aphestia fritzi sp. nov.; Aphestia nigrifemur sp. nov.; Aphestia nigriseta sp. nov. and Aphestia spatulata sp. nov. Two species were redescribed: Aphestia annulipes and Aphestia nigra. Two species that were treated as junior synonym of Aphestia annulipes, had their status revalidated and were redescribed, being: Aphestia brasiliensis Schiner, 1866 sp. reval., e Atomosia affinis Macquart, 1850 sp. reval. Aphestia calceata Schiner, 1867, that was considerated a junior synonym of Aphestia annulipes, is now considered a junior synonym of Aphestia brasiliensis as: Aphestia calceata Schiner, 1867 sin. nov. Atomosia andrenoides Bromley, 1934, that was a junior synonym of Aphestia nigra, was redescribed, had its status revalidated and a new combination with Aphractia Artigas, Papavero & Serra, 1991, was proposed: Aphractia andrenoides (Bromley, 1934) sp. reval.; comb. nov. Aphestia chalybaea von Röder, 1881, was transferred to Cyanonedys Hermann, 1912, becoming Cyanonedys chalybaea (von Röder, 1881) comb. nov. Two new synonyms were proposed for Cyanonedys chalybaea: Cyanonedys leucura Hermann, 1912 sin. nov., type species of the genus, and Clariola nigriscens Ricardo, 1912 sin. nov., that already was a junior synonym of Cyanonedys leucura. The geographic records of the species were increased and a dichotomous illustrated key for the Aphestia species was presented.Aphestia Schiner, 1866, é caracterizado pelo escapo com cerca de duas vezes o comprimento do pedicelo, pós-pedicelo aproximadamente 2,5 vezes o comprimento do escapo e pedicelo juntos com ápice truncado e também pela presença de macrocerdas marginais laterais em todos os tergitos abdominais ou restritas aos dois primeiros tergitos. O gênero contava com três espécies válidas: Aphestia annulipes (Macquat, 1838), Aphestia chalybaea von Röder, 1881 e Aphestia nigra Bigot, 1878. Cinco sinônimos já haviam sido propostos para as espécies de Aphestia e as descrições originais das espécies eram muito sucintas, ambíguas e ofereciam poucos caracteres úteis para a identificação das espécies. Foi realizado um estudo taxonômico de Aphestia com análise dos caracteres morfológicos externos bem como da terminália masculina e feminina. Foram analisados 367 espécimes obtidos através do empréstimo de várias coleções nacionais e estrangeiras. Foram encontradas 11 espécies válidas sendo que, destas, oito são novas: Aphestia amazonica sp. nov.; Aphestia clausicella sp. nov.; Aphestia dicowi sp. nov.; Aphestia fisheri sp. nov.; Aphestia fritzi sp. nov.; Aphestia nigrifemur sp. nov.; Aphestia nigriseta sp. nov. e Aphestia spatulata sp. nov. Duas espécies foram redescritas: Aphestia annulipes e Aphestia nigra. Duas espécies que eram tratadas como sinônimo júnior de Aphestia annulipes, tiveram seu status revalidado e foram redescritas, sendo: Aphestia brasiliensis Schiner, 1866 sp. reval., e Atomosia affinis Macquart, 1850 sp. reval. Aphestia calceata Schiner, 1867 que era considerada sinônimo júnior de Aphestia annulipes, agora, passa a ser considerada sinônimo júnior de Aphestia brasiliensis como: Aphestia calceata Schiner, 1867 sin. nov. Atomosia andrenoides Bromley, 1934, que era sinônimo júnior de Aphestia nigra, foi redescrita, teve seu status revalidado e uma nova combinação com Aphractia Artigas, Papavero & Serra, 1991, foi proposta: Aphractia andrenoides (Bromley, 1934) sp. reval.; comb. nov. Aphestia chalybaea von Röder, 1881, foi transferida para Cyanonedys Hermann, 1912, tornando-se Cyanonedys chalybaea (von Röder, 1881) comb. nov. Dois novos sinônimos foram propostos para Cyanonedis chalybaea: Cyanonedys leucura Hermann, 1912 sin. nov., espécie tipo do gênero e Clariola nigriscens Ricardo, 1912 sin. nov., que já era sinônimo júnior de Cyanonedys leucura. Os registros geográficos das espécies foram ampliados e uma chave de identificação dicotômica ilustrada para as espécies de Aphestia foi apresentada

LEVANTAMENTO FLORÍSTICO E FITOSSOCIOLÓGICO EM ÁREA DE CENTRO DE PESQUISA EM SANTA CRUZ DO SUL, RIO GRANDE DO SUL, BRASIL

Levantamentos fitossociológicos e florísticos são fundamentais para conhecer-se como ocorre a regeneração natural e para planejar melhor atividades de aceleração da recolonização de áreas degradadas. Visando contribuir com estes dados buscou-se estudar a diversidade florística em área reservada a estudos técnicos de uma empresa na região de Cerro Alegre Baixo, município de Santa Cruz do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. A área apresenta 320 hectares e foi explorada entre 2011 e 2012 quanto a ocorrência de espécies vegetais a partir do estudo florístico (método do caminhamento) de todas as sinúsias e fitossociológico (método dos quadrantes) para arbóreas. Um mapa da distribuição vegetal foi elaborado. Estes levantamentos consubstanciaram os resultados deste projeto. Foram encontradas no levantamento florístico 206 espécies vegetais e no levantamento fitossociológico das arbóreas foram identificadas 34 espécies. Asteraceae, Poaceae, Fabaceae, Myrtaceae e Cyperaceae foram as famílias dominantes. Juntas elas totalizam 102 espécies o que representa 49,5% das encontradas. A cobertura predominante na área é de campo limpo. Cordia americana e Luehea divaricata foram as árvores com maior frequência, número de indivíduos e densidade

Leinendera achaetasp. n., a new species of robber fly from Brazil (Diptera, Asilidae, Asilinae)

The third species of the Neotropical genus Leinendera Carrera, 1945,Leinendera achaeta sp. n., is described from Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil. The habitus, wing and male terminalia are described and illustrated, and a key to the three Brazilian species is provided. © Alexssandro Camargo et al

Ommatius: Synonyms, new record, redescription of Ommatius erythropus and description of the female of Ommatius trifidus (Diptera: Asilidae: Ommatiinae)

Ommatius erythropus Schiner, 1867 is redescribed and a lectotype is established. The female of Ommatius trifidus Vieira, Bravo & Rafael, 2010 is described and a new record is provided. Ommatius ruficaudus Curran, 1928 is established as a new synonym of Ommatius pulcher (Engel, 1885). An identification key is presented to the Ommatius costatus species group. A map with the geographic records is provided. © 2017, Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia. All rights reserved

Hexapoda Yearbook (Arthropoda: Mandibulata: Pancrustacea) Brazil 2020: the first annual production survey of new Brazilian species

This paper provided a list of all new Brazilian Hexapoda species described in 2020. Furthermore, based on the information extracted by this list, we tackled additional questions regarding the taxa, the specialists involved in the species descriptions as well as the journals in which those papers have been published. We recorded a total of 680 new Brazilian species of Hexapoda described in 2020, classified in 245 genera, 112 families and 18 orders. These 680 species were published in a total of 219 articles comprising 423 different authors residing in 27 countries. Only 30% of these authors are women, which demonstrates an inequality regarding sexes. In relation to the number of authors by species, the majority of the new species had two authors and the maximum of authors by species was five. We also found inequalities in the production of described species regarding the regions of Brazil, with Southeast and South leading. The top 10 institutions regarding productions of new species have four in the Southeast, two at South and with one ate North Region being the outlier of this pattern. Out of the total 219 published articles, Zootaxa dominated with 322 described species in 95 articles. The average impact factor was of 1.4 with only seven articles being published in Impact Factors above 3, indicating a hardship on publishing taxonomic articles in high-impact journals.The highlight of this paper is that it is unprecedent, as no annual record of Hexapoda species described was ever made in previous years to Brazil.Fil: Silva Neto, Alberto Moreira. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia; BrasilFil: Lopes Falaschi, Rafaela. Universidade Estadual do Ponta Grossa; BrasilFil: Zacca, Thamara. Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro. Museu Nacional; BrasilFil: Hipólito, Juliana. Universidade Federal da Bahia; BrasilFil: Costa Lima Pequeno, Pedro Aurélio. Universidade Federal de Roraima; BrasilFil: Alves Oliveira, João Rafael. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia; BrasilFil: Oliveira Dos Santos, Roberto. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia; BrasilFil: Heleodoro, Raphael Aquino. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia; BrasilFil: Jacobina, Adaiane Catarina Marcondes. Universidade Federal do Paraná; BrasilFil: Somavilla, Alexandre. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia; BrasilFil: Camargo, Alexssandro. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia; BrasilFil: de Oliveira Lira, Aline. Universidad Federal Rural Pernambuco; BrasilFil: Sampaio, Aline Amanda. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia; BrasilFil: da Silva Ferreira, André. Universidad Federal Rural Pernambuco; BrasilFil: Martins, André Luis. Universidade Federal do Paraná; BrasilFil: Figueiredo de Oliveira, Andressa. Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul; BrasilFil: Gonçalves da Silva Wengrat , Ana Paula. Universidade do Sao Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz; BrasilFil: Batista Rosa, Augusto Henrique. Universidade Estadual de Campinas; BrasilFil: Dias Corrêa, Caio Cezar. Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro. Museu Nacional; BrasilFil: Costa De-Souza, Caroline. Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi; BrasilFil: Anjos Dos Santos, Danielle. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Centro de Investigación Esquel de Montaña y Estepa Patagónica. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia "San Juan Bosco". Centro de Investigación Esquel de Montaña y Estepa Patagónica; ArgentinaFil: Pacheco Cordeiro, Danilo. Instituto Nacional Da Mata Atlantica; BrasilFil: Silva Nogueira, David. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia; BrasilFil: Almeida Marques, Dayse Willkenia. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia; BrasilFil: Nunes Barbosa, Diego. Universidade Federal do Paraná; BrasilFil: Mello Mendes, Diego Matheus. Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá; BrasilFil: Galvão de Pádua, Diego. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia; BrasilFil: Silva Vilela, Diogo. Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho; BrasilFil: Gomes Viegas, Eduarda Fernanda. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia; BrasilFil: Carneiro dos Santos, Eduardo. Universidade Federal do Paraná; BrasilFil: Rodrigues Fernandes, Daniell Rodrigo. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia; Brasi

Catálogo Taxonômico da Fauna do Brasil: setting the baseline knowledge on the animal diversity in Brazil

The limited temporal completeness and taxonomic accuracy of species lists, made available in a traditional manner in scientific publications, has always represented a problem. These lists are invariably limited to a few taxonomic groups and do not represent up-to-date knowledge of all species and classifications. In this context, the Brazilian megadiverse fauna is no exception, and the Catálogo Taxonômico da Fauna do Brasil (CTFB) (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/), made public in 2015, represents a database on biodiversity anchored on a list of valid and expertly recognized scientific names of animals in Brazil. The CTFB is updated in near real time by a team of more than 800 specialists. By January 1, 2024, the CTFB compiled 133,691 nominal species, with 125,138 that were considered valid. Most of the valid species were arthropods (82.3%, with more than 102,000 species) and chordates (7.69%, with over 11,000 species). These taxa were followed by a cluster composed of Mollusca (3,567 species), Platyhelminthes (2,292 species), Annelida (1,833 species), and Nematoda (1,447 species). All remaining groups had less than 1,000 species reported in Brazil, with Cnidaria (831 species), Porifera (628 species), Rotifera (606 species), and Bryozoa (520 species) representing those with more than 500 species. Analysis of the CTFB database can facilitate and direct efforts towards the discovery of new species in Brazil, but it is also fundamental in providing the best available list of valid nominal species to users, including those in science, health, conservation efforts, and any initiative involving animals. The importance of the CTFB is evidenced by the elevated number of citations in the scientific literature in diverse areas of biology, law, anthropology, education, forensic science, and veterinary science, among others

FIGURES 46–52 in The ampliatus species group of Ommatius Wiedemann, 1821 (Diptera, Asilidae, Ommatiinae) in Peru with the description of four new species

FIGURES 46–52. Ommatius yanantin sp. nov. Male holotype. 46. Habitus, lateral view; 47. Hind femur, anterior view; 48. Wing; 49–51. Terminalia, dorsal, lateral and ventral views; 52. Drawing of hypandrium + gonocoxite and gonostylus + position of phallus, ventral view.Published as part of <i>Sánchez, Pável & Camargo, Alexssandro, 2023, The ampliatus species group of Ommatius Wiedemann, 1821 (Diptera, Asilidae, Ommatiinae) in Peru with the description of four new species, pp. 501-520 in Zootaxa 5352 (4)</i> on page 512, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5352.4.3, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/8426460">http://zenodo.org/record/8426460</a&gt

FIGURES 53–57 in The ampliatus species group of Ommatius Wiedemann, 1821 (Diptera, Asilidae, Ommatiinae) in Peru with the description of four new species

FIGURES 53–57. Ommatius yanantin sp. nov. Male holotype. 53–54. Hypandrium + gonocoxite and gonostylus, ventral and lateral views; 55. Phallus; 56. Cercus; 57. Subepandrial sclerite.Published as part of <i>Sánchez, Pável & Camargo, Alexssandro, 2023, The ampliatus species group of Ommatius Wiedemann, 1821 (Diptera, Asilidae, Ommatiinae) in Peru with the description of four new species, pp. 501-520 in Zootaxa 5352 (4)</i> on page 513, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5352.4.3, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/8426460">http://zenodo.org/record/8426460</a&gt

Ommatius kuntur Sánchez & Camargo 2023, sp. nov.

Ommatius kuntur sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 054719BD-FEFC-4018-8102-C785206C86B1 (Figs 16–30, 66) Diagnosis. Hind femur black, except narrow base, reddish ventrally (Fig. 16); epandrium with two apical processes, one dorsal, L-shaped, pointed apically and abruptly curved upwards, the other sub-dorsal, long and narrow, rod-like, as long as base of epandrium and also abruptly curved upwards (Fig. 17); subepandrial sclerite with ventral process truncate apically (rounded in lateral view and rectangular in ventral view) (Fig. 22). Female with sternite 8 mostly black setose (Fig. 28), well produced medially, medioapical margin as long as one third the length of the sternite, and as wide as one third its width (Fig. 29). Description of male holotype. Length: body, 12.5 mm; wing, 10 mm. Head (Fig. 16). Antenna black, black setose; two black ocellar setae; face, frons and vertex black, the first golden pruinose, about a seventh width of head, the latter with sparse brownish yellow pruinosity; mystacal macrosetae black above and yellowish bellow; palpus black, mixed yellow and brown setose; proboscis black, white setose ventrally, labial setae yellowish; occiput black, gray pruinose with white setae, upper half of margin of eye with 8–10 postocular black macrosetae, uppermost proclinate. Thorax (Fig. 16). Black; antepronotum and scutum brown pruinose, except for yellow sparse pruinosity on corners of the latter, and around notopleural suture; postpronotum, scutellum, pleura silver pruinose, except on upper side of anepisternum, brown pruinose. Chaetotaxy: pronotum white setose, with two pairs of yellowish macrosetae on antepronotum; postpronotal lobe pale yellow setose; scutum with black macrosetae, 2 notopleural, 1 supra-alar, 1 postalar and 4 postsutural dorsocentral; scutellar disc with few yellow setae, 2 apical scutellar black macrosetae; 1 yellow anepimeral macroseta; anatergal setae absent; katatergal macrosetae yellow; posterior meron + metanepisternum yellow setose. Wing (Fig. 18). Brownish, apical half darkened by microtrichia; veins dark brown, without costal dilation; crossvein r-m at middle of discal cell; R 4+5 bifurcation slightly posterior to level of apex of discal cell; microtrichia on posterior margin of wing arranged in single row; halter yellow. Legs (Fig. 16). Coxae silver pruinose; fore and mid femora yellow ventrally, dark brown dorsally, hind femur black, except narrow base, reddish ventrally; tibiae yellow, apex of mid and hind tibia brown, almost apical half in the latter; tarsomeres dark brown, except first ones of fore and mid tarsi, yellow with dark apex (Fig. 16). Chaetotaxy: Fore femur black setose, long yellow setae ventrally, 1 anterodorsal short black macroseta on basal third; mid femur black setose, long yellow setae ventrally, black macrosetae, 2 anterior, 2 anteroventral, 1 anterodorsal, and 1 posterodorsal, subapical; hind femur mostly yellow setose, macrosetae mostly yellowish, two anterior, 6–7 anteroventral, 7–8 posteroventral, 2–3 apical ones black, 1 anterodorsal, also black, subapical; fore tibia with 2 long posteroventral yellow macrosetae; mid tibia with 2 anterodorsal and 2 anteroventral black macrosetae, 2 posteroventral, 1 yellow, 1 black; hind tibia with 4 black macrosetae dorsally and 1 apical spur-like macroseta; tarsi with black setae, except for one yellow seta on first tarsomere of fore leg. Abdomen (Fig. 16). Black, yellowish setose, except on tergites 5 to 8, mostly black setose; lateral marginal macrosetae on tergite 1 yellow. Terminalia (Figs 17, 19–20). Black (except narrow apex of epandrium, apex of gonocoxite and gonostylus, reddish brown), mostly yellow setose, except some black setae on epandrium; epandrium with two apical processes, one dorsal, prominent, L-shaped, pointed apically and abruptly curved upwards, another sub-dorsal, rod-like, long and narrow, as long as base of epandrium and also curved upwards (Fig. 17); subepandrial sclerite with ventral process with truncate apex, rounded in lateral view and rectangular in ventral view (Fig. 22); gonostylus long and narrow, pointed apically (Figs 24–25); gonocoxite less sclerotized apically and posteriorly, in area of insertion of the gonostylus, gonocoxal apodeme virtually absent (Figs 24–25); ejaculatory apodeme slightly wide in lateral view, as long as phallus (Fig. 23); hypandrium dome-like in ventral view, posterior apex projected, thin and rounded (Figs 17, 20). Female (Figs 26–30). Similar to male, except for: palpus mainly brown to black setose, yellow setae also present; anepimeral macroseta black; 3 postsutural dorsocentral macrosetae; crossvein r-m posterior to middle of discal cell; hind tibia without apical spur-like macroseta; tarsi with black setae (Fig. 26); tergite 8 shiny black, tergite 9+10 short dorsally (Fig. 27); sternite 8 mainly black setose, with row of 4–5 stout black macrosetae obliquely arranged from proximal two-thirds towards its apical corner (one yellow mixed), well produced medially, medioapical margin as long as third the length of tergite, and as wide as a third its width (Figs 28–29); arms of genital fork thin, furcal apodeme short, plate-like; three spherical spermathecae (Fig. 30). Etymology. A masculine noun in apposition, from the Quechua language, meaning condor, sacred animal that in the Andean cosmovision symbolizes the world above or the world of the gods (the hanan pacha). Variation. A female paratype from Ayacucho presents hind femur apically with two anteroventral macrosetae black, in addition the abdomen is mostly black setose dorsally. Holotype condition. Right foreleg missing. Taxonomic discussion. Ommatius kuntur sp. nov. can be separated from other species in the ampliatus group by the diagnosis given above. Additionally, other useful characters to separate this species are palpus partially to predominantly brown setose; fore and mid femora at least yellow on basal third to half posteriorly (Fig. 16); hind femur mostly dark reddish brown to black (Fig. 16); and unusually thick gonocoxal macroseta absent (Figs 24–25). The most similar species is O. quadratus (Figs 58–65). However, through a comparison of the original description, drawings, and images of the holotype, some slight differences are noted. O. quadratus has a dark reddish brown hind femur with the extreme base yellow (Fig. 62), while Ommatius kuntur sp. nov., has a shiny black hind femur with only the extreme base ventrally with a small dark reddish spot (Fig. 16). The hind tibia in O. quadratus is almost entirely yellow with apical third dark yellow; hind tarsus almost completely yellow with last four tarsomeres slightly dark brown towards apex (Fig. 58). In Ommatius kuntur sp. nov. the apical half of the hind tibia and the hind tarsus are dark brown to almost completely black (Fig. 16). The main differences can be observed in the female terminalia. In O. quadratus, according to Scarbrough (2002), the cercus is apically strongly oblique; the internal apical margin of the hypoproct is rounded; the T 9+10 has its apical corner concave with a long spoon-shape depression (Figs 64–65); the S8 has its medioapical margin produced and truncate with corners acutely angled, and sides parallel, slightly raised, joined with a deep notch laterally, notched surface slightly excavated with 1 stout macroseta (Figs 64–65 [socket of macrosetae indicated by yellow arrows]). In Ommatius kuntur sp. nov. the cercus is rounded apically; the hypoproct has a small notch at the apical margin, internally, and with a slight projection internally, subapically; the T 9+10 has rectangular corners and its apical corner is straight without long spoon-shaped depression; the S8 also possesses a medioapical margin produced and truncate with acute corners, and sides parallel, slightly raised (Fig. 29). However, the parallel sides are joined to a shallow notch laterally and the notched surface is not excavated and does not possess a stout macroseta (Fig. 29). In contrast, there is a row of 4–5 stout macrosetae obliquely arranged from the proximal two-thirds of the S8 surface to its apical corner (Fig. 29). Such an array of macrosetae is absent in O. quadratus (Figs 64–65). Distribution. Peru, Departments of Ayacucho (Moyobamba) and Cuzco (Kosñipata Valley) (Fig. 66). Both montane forests on the eastern slopes of the Andes. Known specimens were collected in April, July, August, October and December. Type material. Holotype: PERU, CU Valle de Kosñipata, S. Pedro 1520 m 13°03’23”S, 71°32’55”W 24.x.2007 C. Castillo / HOLOTYPE ♁ Ommatius kuntur Sánchez & Camargo (MUSM). Paratypes: Same data as holotype (1 ♁); same data as holotype, except date, 25.vii.2007 (1 ♀); PERU, CU Valle de Kosñipata, Rocotal 2052 m 13°06’48”S, 71°34’13”W 10.xii.2007 C. Castillo (1 ♀) / PARATYPE ♀ Ommatius kuntur Sánchez & Camargo (MUSM); PERU.AY. La Mar, Moyobamba 13°’05’14”S, 73°30’23.5”W, 1918 m. Malaise, “bosque” 27.iv.2022 M. Alvarado / PARATYPE ♀ Ommatius kuntur Sánchez & Camargo (MUSM); same data as previous one except date, 30.viii.2022 (3 ♁); PERU. AY. La Mar, Moyobamba 13°’04’47”S, 73°31’20”W, 1726 m. 29.viii.2022 M. Alvarado Trampa de luz “café sin sombra” (1 ♁, 1 ♀).Published as part of Sánchez, Pável & Camargo, Alexssandro, 2023, The ampliatus species group of Ommatius Wiedemann, 1821 (Diptera, Asilidae, Ommatiinae) in Peru with the description of four new species, pp. 501-520 in Zootaxa 5352 (4) on pages 505-508, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5352.4.3, http://zenodo.org/record/842646

FIGURES 16–25 in The ampliatus species group of Ommatius Wiedemann, 1821 (Diptera, Asilidae, Ommatiinae) in Peru with the description of four new species

FIGURES 16–25. Ommatius kuntur sp. nov. Male. 16. Habitus, lateral view; 17. Terminalia, lateral view; 18. Wing; 19–20. Terminalia, dorsal and ventral views; 21. Cercus; 22. Subepandrial sclerite; 23. Phallus, lateral view; 24–25. Gonocoxite and gonostylus, ventral and lateral views. 16–19. Holotype; 20–25. Paratype.Published as part of <i>Sánchez, Pável & Camargo, Alexssandro, 2023, The ampliatus species group of Ommatius Wiedemann, 1821 (Diptera, Asilidae, Ommatiinae) in Peru with the description of four new species, pp. 501-520 in Zootaxa 5352 (4)</i> on page 506, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5352.4.3, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/8426460">http://zenodo.org/record/8426460</a&gt