Prophylactic cranial irradiation in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: outcome of recursive partitioning analysis group 1 patients

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has been demonstrated to reduce or delay the incidence of brain metastases (BM) in locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (LA-NSCLC) patients with various prognostic groups. With this current cohort we planned to evaluate the potential usefulness of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) specifically in recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) Group 1, which is the most favorable group of LA-NSCLC patients.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Between March 2007 and February 2008, 62 patients in RPA group 1 were treated with sequential chemoradiotherapy and PCI for stage IIIB NSCLC. The induction chemotherapy consisted of 3 courses of cisplatin (80 mg/m²) and docetaxel (80 mg/m²); each course was given every 21 days. Thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) was given at a dose of 60 Gy using 3-D conformal planning. All patients received a total dose of 30 Gy PCI (2 Gy/fr, 5 days a week), beginning on the first day of the TRT. Then, all patients received 3 further courses of the same chemotherapy protocol.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Six (9.7%) patients developed brain metastases during their clinical course. Only one (2%) patient developed brain metastasis as the site of first treatment failure. Median brain metastasis-free survival, overall survival, and progression free survival were 16.6, 16.7, and 13.0 months, respectively. By univariate analysis, rates of BM were significantly higher in patients younger than 60 years of age (p = 0.03). Multivariate analysis showed no significant difference in BM-free survival according to gender, age, histology, and initial T- and N-stage.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The current finding of almost equal bone metastasis free survival and overall survival in patients with LA-NSCLC in RPA group 1 suggests a longer survival for patients who receive PCI, and thereby have a reduced risk of BM.</p

Suicide risk in schizophrenia: learning from the past to change the future

Suicide is a major cause of death among patients with schizophrenia. Research indicates that at least 5–13% of schizophrenic patients die by suicide, and it is likely that the higher end of range is the most accurate estimate. There is almost total agreement that the schizophrenic patient who is more likely to commit suicide is young, male, white and never married, with good premorbid function, post-psychotic depression and a history of substance abuse and suicide attempts. Hopelessness, social isolation, hospitalization, deteriorating health after a high level of premorbid functioning, recent loss or rejection, limited external support, and family stress or instability are risk factors for suicide in patients with schizophrenia. Suicidal schizophrenics usually fear further mental deterioration, and they experience either excessive treatment dependence or loss of faith in treatment. Awareness of illness has been reported as a major issue among suicidal schizophrenic patients, yet some researchers argue that insight into the illness does not increase suicide risk. Protective factors play also an important role in assessing suicide risk and should also be carefully evaluated. The neurobiological perspective offers a new approach for understanding self-destructive behavior among patients with schizophrenia and may improve the accuracy of screening schizophrenics for suicide. Although, there is general consensus on the risk factors, accurate knowledge as well as early recognition of patients at risk is still lacking in everyday clinical practice. Better knowledge may help clinicians and caretakers to implement preventive measures. This review paper is the results of a joint effort between researchers in the field of suicide in schizophrenia. Each expert provided a brief essay on one specific aspect of the problem. This is the first attempt to present a consensus report as well as the development of a set of guidelines for reducing suicide risk among schizophenia patients

Students' Mental Models Of Light To Explain The Compton Effect

Light is one of the interesting concepts used for explaining the important processes in modern physics. Because of this reason the students have some misunderstandings and difficulties about light and related phenomena. The present study aims to determine pre-service teachers' understanding of and difficulties with light concept via mental models of light utilized by the students for the explanations of Compton Effect. This research has been carried on the group of 25 students studying in the departments of physics education at a Government University in Turkey. As a data collection tool open - ended questions pertaining drawings and explanations were used. The participants consist of 15 female and 10 male students and they ranged from 22 to 24 years of age. According to the results of this study three mental models which were named as hybrid model, ray and particle model were determined used by the students while explaining the Compton Effect. Implications of our findings for teaching are discussed. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.Wo

Pretransplant Hepatitis C Virus Treatment Decreases Access to High-quality Livers

Background. Despite the revolutionary role of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus (HCV), the treatment timing for liver transplant candidates remains controversial. We hypothesize that deferring treatment until after liver transplantation improves access to a larger and higher-quality donor pool without a detrimental impact on post-liver transplantation outcomes. Methods. This single-center study includes recipients that underwent deceased-donor liver transplant with HCV as the primary indication January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018. For recipients that were untreated (n = 87) versus treated (n = 42) pre-LT, we compared post-LT mortality using Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment-weighted data. Results. Among pre-LT untreated recipients, 95% were willing to accept an HCV+ donor, and 44.8% received a positive HCV antibody and nucleic acid amplification test (NAT) liver. Among pre-LT treated recipients, 5% were willing to accept an HCV+ donor, and 100% received a negative HCV antibody and NAT liver. The median calculated model for end-stage liver disease at transplant was similar between pre-LT untreated (13, IQR = 9–22) and treated recipients (11, IQR = 8–14) (P = 0.1). Pre-LT treated recipients received livers from older (47 y old versus 37, P < 0.01) and higher body mass index donors (30.2 versus 26.6; P = 0.04) and spent longer on the waiting list (319 d 180, P < 0.001). Unadjusted post-LT mortality at 1 year was higher in the pre-LT treated recipients (14.6% versus 3.5%, P = 0.02). After adjusting for recipient factors, pre-LT treated recipients trended toward a 3.9 times higher risk of mortality compared with the pre-LT untreated recipients (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.973.8615.4) (P = 0.06). Conclusions. Deferring HCV treatment improves access to higher-quality donors and may improve post-LT survival