Multifaceted intervention to decrease the rate of severe postpartum haemorrhage: the PITHAGORE6 cluster-randomised controlled trial.: Intervention to decrease severe postpartum haemorrhage

International audienceOBJECTIVE: Decreasing the prevalence of severe postpartum haemorrhages (PPH) is a major obstetrical challenge. These are often considered to be associated with substandard initial care. Strategies to increase the appropriateness of early management of PPH must be assessed. We tested the hypothesis that a multifaceted intervention aimed at increasing the translation into practice of a protocol for early management of PPH, would reduce the incidence of severe PPH. DESIGN: Cluster-randomised trial. POPULATION: 106 maternity units in six French regions. METHODS: Maternity units were randomly assigned to receive the intervention, or to have the protocol passively disseminated. The intervention combined outreach visits to discuss the protocol in each local context, reminders, and peer reviews of severe incidents, and was implemented in each maternity hospital by a team pairing an obstetrician and a midwife. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the incidence of severe PPH, defined as a composite of one or more of: transfusion, embolisation, surgical procedure, transfer to intensive care, peripartum haemoglobin decrease of 4 g/dl or more, death. The main secondary outcomes were PPH management practices. RESULTS: The mean rate of severe PPH was 1.64% (SD 0.80) in the intervention units and 1.65% (SD 0.96) in control units; difference not significant. Some elements of PPH management were applied more frequently in intervention units-help from senior staff (P = 0.005), or tended to - second-line pharmacological treatment (P = 0.06), timely blood test (P = 0.09). CONCLUSION: This educational intervention did not affect the rate of severe PPH as compared with control units, although it improved some practices

[Prophylaxis of thromboembolic disease in obstetrics after the French guidelines publication]

International audienceOBJECTIVES: This work is a study of the prophylaxis of maternal venous thromboembolism (VTE) after the publication of the French guidelines and a comparison between the practice and the guidelines. POPULATION AND METHODS: Inquiry into the practice of 193 anaesthetists from maternities of the Rhône-Alps area has been made. RESULTS: Of the 48.2% anaesthetists who answered, 92.5% of them estimate that the caesarean is a risk factor of VTE; 87% prescribe an antithrombotic treatment and 6.5% treat differently the prophylactic caesareans and the urgent ones. The classification of the risk factors is identical to the guidelines for the age, the hypertension and the prophylactic caesarean (p<0.0001). For all the other factors, the risk is overestimated, leading to an over-treatment. Eighty percent of the anaesthetists read the guidelines and 84% give them a positive value. There is a better adequacy between the guidelines and the professionals from university hospitals as compared to the non university hospitals ones (p=0.0027). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Patients are managed approximately and very differently from one consultant to another. A facility of use of the guidelines will undoubtedly make it possible to obtain a more coherent attitude

Comment je préviens les infections de paroi après césarienne chez des patientes obèses en 2017 ? [How do I prevent caesarean wound infections in obese patients in 2017?]

Obesity is an important risk factor of cesarean section and is associated with an increased risk of wound complications such as infections. This review focuses on the available strategies to limit complications in this population. Choice of antiseptic solution, appropriate dose and type of antibiotic prophylaxy, suture closure of subcutaneous fat, suture skin closure and closed incision negative pressure wound therapy may reduce the risk of wound infections associated with cesarean section in obese patients. Vaginal desinfection, plastic adhesive draps, high-concentration supplemental perioperative oxygen, use of a barrier retractor, wound drainage and type of skin incision are discussed in this review. Clinical trials of good quality are needed to improve our clinical practice

Serious primary post-partum hemorrhage, arterial embolization and future fertility: a retrospective study of 46 cases.

International audienceBACKGROUND: The guidelines advise arterial embolization in case of post-partum hemorrhage. We evaluated its feasibility and the subsequent fertility. METHODS: A retrospective study has been conducted in our center for the past 10 years (1996-2005). Fifty-two patients experiencing a primary post-partum hemorrhage who were resistant to medical treatment underwent uterine artery embolization and/or hysterectomy. In case of arterial embolization, a follow-up of all the patients was realized, focusing on the preservation of fertility. RESULTS: Six (11.5%) patients underwent hysterectomy straightaway and 46 (88.5%) arterial embolization in the first instance including 35 arterial embolizations after Cesarean section. Embolization was successful among 41 patients (89.1%) and hysterectomy was performed on the 5 (10.9%) others. Overall, 11/24 398 women suffered from a definitive loss of fertility after post-partum hemorrhage. Fertility was studied at least 1 year after the delivery. All patients had a return of normal menses. Sixteen of 41 women (39%) wanted another child and 100% succeeded. Nineteen pregnancies, including two twin pregnancy and one early spontaneous abortion were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Embolization is a safe and effective non-surgical method to resolve post-partum hemorrhage and should be regarded as gold standard in a hemodynamically stable patient. Furthermore, subsequent fertility is not impaired by the procedure

La chirurgie ambulatoire du cancer du sein : étude de satisfaction des patientes et place du médecin traitant

International audienceObjectives: To evaluate the satisfaction of patients with breast cancer treated surgically in an outpatient setting and the role of the attending physician.Methods: This prospective satisfaction study focused on patients who had a breast cancer surgery as an outpatient procedure, between February and October 2018, at the CHU and Clinique Mutualiste chirurgicale de Saint-Étienne, Loire, France. The data were collected via a satisfaction survey, which was given to the patients during the postoperative visit.Results: One hundred and four patients were included. The most frequent surgery was partial mastectomy with sentinel lymph node (63.5%). On overall breast cancer surgery, 47.6% were performed on an outpatient basis. Ninety-seven percent of the patients were satisfied, 96.9% would have recommended this procedure to a friend and 47% could resume their daily activities as early as the second day. Among the patients, 16.2% would have preferred to stay on day more in hospital after the surgery. This preference was related to the complexity (P=0.035) and duration of the surgery (P=0.025), fatigue (P=0.03) and feeling of isolation (P=0.016). Among the patients, 25.5% saw their doctor for organic, psychological, administrative, monitoring and informational issues.Conclusions: Outpatient breast cancer surgery seems safe and qualitative. Standardized procedures, relevant information about the outpatient procedure and specificities of this type of care, as well as the transmission of information with the attending physician are the keys to success