The importance of meal assessment in ALS patients

Background: the importance of instrumental evaluation of swallowing in ALS patients is highly recognized in order to assess swallowing safety and prevent pulmonary complications. However, swallowing performance during instrumental assessment may not be representative of what happens when consuming meals in everyday life. Indeed, as fatigue is a common feature in ALS patients, swallowing efficacy may progressively decline during mealtime consumption and food and liquid oral intake may not be sufficient. Objectives: to investigate the relationship between the performance during mealtime consumption and the efficacy of oral and pharyngeal phase of swallowing in ALS patients. Methods: thirteen ALS patients, 7 males and 6 females with a median age of 68.5 years (range 51-78) were enrolled in the study. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) was conducted testing liquids, semisolids and, whether possible, solids. The Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and the Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS) were used to assess the FEES. The Test of Mastication and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS) was performed. Tongue strength and resistance were assessed through the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI). Patients completed the Eating Assessment Tool-10, a self-reported questionnaire. Typical oral intake was recorded using the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS). Meal consumption was observed and scored through the Mealtime Assessment Scale (MAS); the time the patients needed to consume a meal was recorded. Correlations between MAS total score or time and PAS, DOSS, EAT-10, FOIS, TOMASS and IOPI measures were studied using Spearman\u2019s correlation coefficient. Results: a statistically significant correlation was found between MAS total scores and FOIS (r=0.755, p=0.007), EAT-10 (r=-0.724, p=0.012), tongue strength (r=0.718, p=0.019) and TOMASS total time (r=-0.709, p=0.046). Time needed to consume a meal significantly correlated with tongue resistance (r=0.675, p=0.032) and number of discrete bites during TOMASS (r=-0.793, p=0.033). No statistically significant correlations were found between MAS and PAS or DOSS. Discussion and conclusion: these preliminary results suggest that instrumental assessment of swallowing, especially FEES, may not be exhaustive in ALS patients as it does not predict patient\u2019s performance during meals. Efficacy of swallowing oral phase seems to be related to meal consumption more than pharyngeal phase. Therefore, our data stress the need of a comprehensive swallowing evaluation in ALS patients, including instrumental, oral phase and mealtime assessment, in order to estimate the risk of both pulmonary and nutritional complications related to dysphagia

The importance of meal assessment in ALS patients

Background: the importance of instrumental evaluation of swallowing in ALS patients is highly recognized in order to assess swallowing safety and prevent pulmonary complications. However, swallowing performance during instrumental assessment may not be representative of what happens when consuming meals in everyday life. Indeed, as fatigue is a common feature in ALS patients, swallowing efficacy may progressively decline during mealtime consumption and food and liquid oral intake may not be sufficient. Objectives: to investigate the relationship between the performance during mealtime consumption and the efficacy of oral and pharyngeal phase of swallowing in ALS patients. Methods: thirteen ALS patients, 7 males and 6 females with a median age of 68.5 years (range 51-78) were enrolled in the study. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) was conducted testing liquids, semisolids and, whether possible, solids. The Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and the Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS) were used to assess the FEES. The Test of Mastication and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS) was performed. Tongue strength and resistance were assessed through the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI). Patients completed the Eating Assessment Tool-10, a self-reported questionnaire. Typical oral intake was recorded using the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS). Meal consumption was observed and scored through the Mealtime Assessment Scale (MAS); the time the patients needed to consume a meal was recorded. Correlations between MAS total score or time and PAS, DOSS, EAT-10, FOIS, TOMASS and IOPI measures were studied using Spearman\u2019s correlation coefficient. Results: a statistically significant correlation was found between MAS total scores and FOIS (r=0.755, p=0.007), EAT-10 (r=-0.724, p=0.012), tongue strength (r=0.718, p=0.019) and TOMASS total time (r=-0.709, p=0.046). Time needed to consume a meal significantly correlated with tongue resistance (r=0.675, p=0.032) and number of discrete bites during TOMASS (r=-0.793, p=0.033). No statistically significant correlations were found between MAS and PAS or DOSS. Discussion and conclusion: these preliminary results suggest that instrumental assessment of swallowing, especially FEES, may not be exhaustive in ALS patients as it does not predict patient\u2019s performance during meals. Efficacy of swallowing oral phase seems to be related to meal consumption more than pharyngeal phase. Therefore, our data stress the need of a comprehensive swallowing evaluation in ALS patients, including instrumental, oral phase and mealtime assessment, in order to estimate the risk of both pulmonary and nutritional complications related to dysphagia

Standard versus personalized schedule of regorafenib in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective, multicenter, real-world study

Background: Despite its proven activity as third-line treatment in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), regorafenib can present a poor tolerability profile which often leads to treatment modifications and transient or permanent discontinuation; thus, in clinical practice physicians usually adopt various dosing and interval schedules to counteract regorafenib-related adverse events and avoid treatment interruption. The aim of this real-world study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of personalized schedules of regorafenib in patients with metastatic GIST, in comparison with the standard schedule (160 mg daily, 3-weeks-on, 1-week-off). Patients and methods: Institutional registries across seven Italian reference centers were retrospectively reviewed and data of interest retrieved to identify patients with GIST who had received regorafenib from February 2013 to January 2021. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate survival and the log-rank test to make comparisons. Results: Of a total of 152 patients with GIST, 49 were treated with standard dose, while 103 received personalized schedules. At a median follow-up of 36.5 months, median progression-free survival was 5.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.73-11.0 months] versus 9.7 months (95% CI 7.9-14.5 months) in the standard-dose and the personalized schedule groups, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 0.51; 95% CI 0.34-0.75; P = 0.00052]. Median overall survival was 16.6 months (95% CI 14.1-21.8 months) versus 20.5 months (95% CI 15.0-25.4 months), respectively (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.49-1.22; P = 0.16). Conclusions: Regorafenib-personalized schedules are commonly adopted in daily clinical practice of high-volume GIST expert centers and correlate with significant improvement of therapeutic outcomes. Therefore, regorafenib treatment optimization in patients with GIST may represent the best strategy to maximize long-term therapy

A New Approach for Adipose Tissue Treatment and Body Contouring Using Radiofrequency-Assisted Liposuction

A new liposuction technology for adipocyte lipolysis and uniform three-dimensional tissue heating and contraction is presented. The technology is based on bipolar radiofrequency energy applied to the subcutaneous adipose tissue and subdermal skin surface. Preliminary clinical results, thermal monitoring, and histologic biopsies of the treated tissue demonstrate rapid preaspiration liquefaction of adipose tissue, coagulation of subcutaneous blood vessels, and uniform sustained heating of tissue

hERG1 Channels Regulate VEGF-A Secretion in Human Gastric Cancer: Clinicopathological Correlations and Therapeutical Implications

Purpose: hERG1 channels are aberrantly expressed in several types of human cancers, where they affect different aspects of cancer cell behavior. A thorough analysis of the functional role and clinical significance of hERG1 channels in gastric cancer is still lacking. Experimental Design: hERG1 expression was tested in a wide (508 samples) Italian cohort of surgically resected patients with gastric cancer, by immunohistochemistry and real-time quantitative PCR. The functional link between hERG1 and the VEGF-A was studied in different gastric cancer cell lines. The effects of hERG1 and VEGF-A inhibition were evaluated in vivo in xenograft mouse models. Results: hERG1 was positive in69% of the patients and positivity correlated with Lauren's intestinal type, fundus localization of the tumor, G1-G2 grading, I and II tumor-node-metastasis stage, and VEGF-A expression. hERG1 activity modulated VEGF-A secretion, through an AKT-dependent regulation of the transcriptional activity of the hypoxia inducible factor. Treatment of immunodeficient mice xenografted with human gastric cancer cells, with a combination of hERG1 blockers and anti-VEGF-A antibodies, impaired tumor growth more than single-drug treatments. Conclusion: Our results show that hERG1 (i) is aberrantly expressed in human gastric cancer since its early stages; (ii) drives an intracellular pathway leading to VEGF-A secretion; (iii) can be exploited to identify a gastric cancer patients' group where a combined treatment with antiangiogenic drugs and noncardiotoxic hERG1 inhibitors could be proposed. © 2014 American Association for Cancer Research

Single-frame multiparameter platforms for seafloor geophysical and environmental observations: projects and missons from GEOSTAR to ORION

The paper presents an overview of recent seafloor long-term single-frame multiparameter platform developed in the framework of the European Commission and Italian projects starting from the GEOSTAR prototype. The main features of the different systems are described as well as the sea missions that led to their validation. The ORION seafloor observatory network recently developed, based on the GEOSTAR-type platforms and engaged in a deep-sea mission at 3300 m w.d. in the Mediterranean Sea, is also describe

Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO-EURACAN-GENTURIS Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) comprise ∼80 entities defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) classification based on a combination of distinctive morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular features.1 These ESMO–EURACAN–GENTURIS (European Society for Medical Oncology; European Reference Network for Rare Adult Solid Cancers; European Reference Network for Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes) Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) will cover STSs, with the exception of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) that are covered in the ESMO–EURACAN–GENTURIS GIST CPGs.2 EURACAN and GENTURIS are the European Reference Networks connecting European institutions, appointed by their governments, to cover rare adult solid cancers and genetic cancer risk syndromes, respectively. Extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma, round cell sarcoma with EWSR1-non-ETS fusion and sarcomas with CIC rearrangements and BCOR genetic alterations are covered by the ESMO–EURACAN–GENTURIS–ERN PaedCan (European Reference Network for Paediatric Oncology) bone sarcomas CPG.3 Kaposi's sarcoma, embryonal and alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma are not discussed in this manuscript, while pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma is viewed as a high-grade, adult-type STS. Finally, extraskeletal osteosarcoma is also a considered a high-grade STS, whose clinical resemblance with osteosarcoma of bone is doubtful. The methodology followed during the consensus meeting is specified at the end of the manuscript in a dedicated paragraph