11 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
MS AHI1 genetic risk promotes IFNγ+ CD4+ T cells
Objective: To study the influence of the Abelson helper integration site 1 (AHI1) locus associated with MS susceptibility on CD4+ T cell function. Methods: We characterized the chromatin state of T cells in the MS-associated AHI1 linkage disequilibrium (LD) block. The expression and the role of the AHI1 variant were examined in T cells from genotyped healthy subjects who were recruited from the PhenoGenetic Project, and the function of AHI1 was explored using T cells from Ahi1 knockout mice. Results: Chromatin state analysis reveals that the LD block containing rs4896153, which is robustly associated with MS susceptibility (odds ratio 1.15, p = 1.65 × 10−13), overlaps with strong enhancer regions that are present in human naive and memory CD4+ T cells. Relative to the rs4896153A protective allele, the rs4896153T susceptibility allele is associated with decreased AHI1 mRNA expression, specifically in naive CD4+ T cells (p = 1.73 × 10−74, n = 213), and we replicate this effect in an independent set of subjects (p = 2.5 × 10−9, n = 32). Functional studies then showed that the rs4896153T risk variant and the subsequent decreased AHI1 expression were associated with reduced CD4+ T cell proliferation and a specific differentiation into interferon gamma (IFNγ)–positive T cells when compared with the protective rs4896153A allele. This T cell phenotype was also observed in murine CD4+ T cells with genetic deletion of Ahi1. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the effect of the AHI1 genetic risk for MS is mediated, in part, by enhancing the development of proinflammatory IFNγ+ T cells that have previously been implicated in MS and its mouse models
Many Labs 5:Testing pre-data collection peer review as an intervention to increase replicability
Replication studies in psychological science sometimes fail to reproduce prior findings. If these studies use methods that are unfaithful to the original study or ineffective in eliciting the phenomenon of interest, then a failure to replicate may be a failure of the protocol rather than a challenge to the original finding. Formal pre-data-collection peer review by experts may address shortcomings and increase replicability rates. We selected 10 replication studies from the Reproducibility Project: Psychology (RP:P; Open Science Collaboration, 2015) for which the original authors had expressed concerns about the replication designs before data collection; only one of these studies had yielded a statistically significant effect (p < .05). Commenters suggested that lack of adherence to expert review and low-powered tests were the reasons that most of these RP:P studies failed to replicate the original effects. We revised the replication protocols and received formal peer review prior to conducting new replication studies. We administered the RP:P and revised protocols in multiple laboratories (median number of laboratories per original study = 6.5, range = 3?9; median total sample = 1,279.5, range = 276?3,512) for high-powered tests of each original finding with both protocols. Overall, following the preregistered analysis plan, we found that the revised protocols produced effect sizes similar to those of the RP:P protocols (?r = .002 or .014, depending on analytic approach). The median effect size for the revised protocols (r = .05) was similar to that of the RP:P protocols (r = .04) and the original RP:P replications (r = .11), and smaller than that of the original studies (r = .37). Analysis of the cumulative evidence across the original studies and the corresponding three replication attempts provided very precise estimates of the 10 tested effects and indicated that their effect sizes (median r = .07, range = .00?.15) were 78% smaller, on average, than the original effect sizes (median r = .37, range = .19?.50)
Erratum: Corrigendum: Analysis of self-antigen specificity of islet-infiltrating T cells from human donors with type 1 diabetes
Analysis of self-antigen specificity of islet-infiltrating T cells from human donors with type 1 diabetes
A major therapeutic goal for type 1 diabetes (T1D) is to induce autoantigen-specific tolerance of T cells. This could suppress autoimmunity in those at risk for the development of T1D, as well as in those with established disease who receive islet replacement or regeneration therapy. Because functional studies of human autoreactive T cell responses have been limited largely to peripheral blood–derived T cells(1–3), it is unclear how representative the peripheral T cell repertoire is of T cells infiltrating the islets. Our knowledge of the insulitic T cell repertoire is derived from histological and immunohistochemical analyses of insulitis(4–8), the identification of autoreactive CD8(+) T cells in situ, in islets of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2(+) donors(9) and isolation and identification of DQ8 and DQ2–DQ8 heterodimer–restricted, proinsulin-reactive CD4(+) T cells grown from islets of a single donor with T1D(10). Here we present an analysis of 50 of a total of 236 CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell lines grown from individual handpicked islets or clones directly sorted from handpicked, dispersed islets from nine donors with T1D. Seventeen of these T cell lines and clones reacted to a broad range of studied native islet antigens and to post-translationally modified peptides. These studies demonstrate the existence of a variety of islet-infiltrating, islet-autoantigen reactive T cells in individuals with T1D, and these data have implications for the design of successful immunotherapies