25 research outputs found

    ROC analysis.

    No full text
    <p>SE standard error of AUC <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0038219#pone.0038219-Hanley1" target="_blank">[41]</a>; AUC<sub>0–0.1</sub>, AUC for false positive rate between 0 and 10% (false positives were defined as the top function prediction according to each score having an MCC or BDT score > = 0.5). The AUC and AUC<sub>0–0.1</sub> scores were calculated using ROCR <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0038219#pone.0038219-Sing1" target="_blank">[39]</a>. The highest AUC and AUC<sub>0–0.1</sub> scores for each CASP prediction session and each performance measure (MCC and BDT) are indicated in bold.</p

    All versus all analysis for the top methods in CASP8 along with the FunFOLD and FunFOLDQA methods.

    No full text
    <p>The analysis is based on common subsets of all CASP8 function prediction targets, with a minimum of 10 predictions in common. Predictions are scored using the BDT metric. Ho  =  No difference between the methods in the rows and the columns. H1  =  the methods in the row has a higher correlation. Bold values indicate significant p-values (P<0.05).</p

    All versus all analysis for the top server methods in CASP9 along with the FunFOLD and FunFOLDQA methods.

    No full text
    <p>The analysis is based on common subsets of all CASP9 function prediction targets, with a minimum of 10 predictions in common. Predictions are scored using the BDT metric. Ho  =  No difference between the methods in the rows and the columns. H1  =  the methods in the row has a higher correlation. Bold values indicate significant p-values (p<0.05).</p
    corecore