Air pollution and mortality in the Canary Islands: a time-series analysis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The island factor of the cities of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria and Santa Cruz de Tenerife, along with their proximity to Africa and their meteorology, create a particular setting that influences the air quality of these cities and provides researchers an opportunity to analyze the acute effects of air-pollutants on daily mortality.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>From 2000 to 2004, the relationship between daily changes in PM₁₀, PM_2.5, SO₂, NO₂, CO, and ozone levels and daily total mortality and mortality due to respiratory and heart diseases were assessed using Generalized Additive Poisson models controlled for potential confounders. The lag effect (up to five days) as well as the concurrent and previous day averages and distributed lag models were all estimated. Single and two pollutant models were also constructed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Daily levels of PM₁₀, PM_2.5, NO₂, and SO₂were found to be associated with an increase in respiratory mortality in Santa Cruz de Tenerife and with increased heart disease mortality in Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, thus indicating an association between daily ozone levels and mortality from heart diseases. The effects spread over five successive days. SO₂was the only air pollutant significantly related with total mortality (lag 0).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>There is a short-term association between current exposure levels to air pollution and mortality (total as well as that due specifically to heart and respiratory diseases) in both cities. Risk coefficients were higher for respiratory and cardiovascular mortality, showing a delayed effect over several days.</p

Fixed and random effects models: making an informed choice

This paper assesses the options available to researchers analysing multilevel (including longitudinal) data, with the aim of supporting good methodological decision-making. Given the confusion in the literature about the key properties of fixed and random effects (FE and RE) models, we present these models’ capabilities and limitations. We also discuss the within-between RE model, sometimes misleadingly labelled a ‘hybrid’ model, showing that it is the most general of the three, with all the strengths of the other two. As such, and because it allows for important extensions—notably random slopes—we argue it should be used (as a starting point at least) in all multilevel analyses. We develop the argument through simulations, evaluating how these models cope with some likely mis-specifications. These simulations reveal that (1) failing to include random slopes can generate anti-conservative standard errors, and (2) assuming random intercepts are Normally distributed, when they are not, introduces only modest biases. These results strengthen the case for the use of, and need for, these models

Systematic review of methods used in meta-analyses where a primary outcome is an adverse or unintended event

addresses: Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry, St Luke's Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. [email protected]: PMCID: PMC3528446types: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't© 2012 Warren et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.Adverse consequences of medical interventions are a source of concern, but clinical trials may lack power to detect elevated rates of such events, while observational studies have inherent limitations. Meta-analysis allows the combination of individual studies, which can increase power and provide stronger evidence relating to adverse events. However, meta-analysis of adverse events has associated methodological challenges. The aim of this study was to systematically identify and review the methodology used in meta-analyses where a primary outcome is an adverse or unintended event, following a therapeutic intervention

Transitional Regression Models, with Application to Environmental Time Series

Environmental epidemiologists often encounter time series data in the form of discrete or other nonnormal outcomes; for example, in modeling the relationship between air pollution and hospital admissions or mortality rates. We present a case study examining the association between pollen counts and meteorologic covariates. Although such time series data are inadequately described by standard methods for Gaussian time series, they are often autocorrelated, and warrant an analysis beyond those provided by ordinary generalized linear models (GLMs). Transitional regression models (TRMs), signifying nonlinear regression models expressed in terms of conditional means and variances given past observations, provide a unifying framework for two mainstream approaches to extending the GLM for autocorrelated data. The first approach models current outcomes with a GLM that incorporates past outcomes as covariates, whereas the second models individual outcomes with marginal GLMs and then couples the error terms with an autoregressive covariance matrix. Although the two approaches coincide for the Gaussian GLM, which serves as a helpful introductory example, in general they yield fundamentally different models. We analyze the pollen study using TRM's of both types and present parameter estimates together with asymptotic and bootstrap standard errors. In several cases we find evidence of residual autocorrelation; however, when we relax the TRM to allow for a nonparametric smooth trend, the autocorrelation disappears. This kind of trade-off between autocorrelation and flexibility is to be expected, and has a natural interpretation in terms of the covariance function for a nonparametric smoother. We provide an algorithm for fitting these flexible TRM's that is relatively easy to program with the generalized additive model software in S-PLUS. © 2000 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC