336 research outputs found
Abstract Canonical Inference
An abstract framework of canonical inference is used to explore how different
proof orderings induce different variants of saturation and completeness.
Notions like completion, paramodulation, saturation, redundancy elimination,
and rewrite-system reduction are connected to proof orderings. Fairness of
deductive mechanisms is defined in terms of proof orderings, distinguishing
between (ordinary) "fairness," which yields completeness, and "uniform
fairness," which yields saturation.Comment: 28 pages, no figures, to appear in ACM Trans. on Computational Logi
On the Expressivity and Applicability of Model Representation Formalisms
A number of first-order calculi employ an explicit model representation
formalism for automated reasoning and for detecting satisfiability. Many of
these formalisms can represent infinite Herbrand models. The first-order
fragment of monadic, shallow, linear, Horn (MSLH) clauses, is such a formalism
used in the approximation refinement calculus. Our first result is a finite
model property for MSLH clause sets. Therefore, MSLH clause sets cannot
represent models of clause sets with inherently infinite models. Through a
translation to tree automata, we further show that this limitation also applies
to the linear fragments of implicit generalizations, which is the formalism
used in the model-evolution calculus, to atoms with disequality constraints,
the formalisms used in the non-redundant clause learning calculus (NRCL), and
to atoms with membership constraints, a formalism used for example in decision
procedures for algebraic data types. Although these formalisms cannot represent
models of clause sets with inherently infinite models, through an additional
approximation step they can. This is our second main result. For clause sets
including the definition of an equivalence relation with the help of an
additional, novel approximation, called reflexive relation splitting, the
approximation refinement calculus can automatically show satisfiability through
the MSLH clause set formalism.Comment: 15 page
Splitting Proofs for Interpolation
We study interpolant extraction from local first-order refutations. We
present a new theoretical perspective on interpolation based on clearly
separating the condition on logical strength of the formula from the
requirement on the com- mon signature. This allows us to highlight the space of
all interpolants that can be extracted from a refutation as a space of simple
choices on how to split the refuta- tion into two parts. We use this new
insight to develop an algorithm for extracting interpolants which are linear in
the size of the input refutation and can be further optimized using metrics
such as number of non-logical symbols or quantifiers. We implemented the new
algorithm in first-order theorem prover VAMPIRE and evaluated it on a large
number of examples coming from the first-order proving community. Our
experiments give practical evidence that our work improves the state-of-the-art
in first-order interpolation.Comment: 26th Conference on Automated Deduction, 201
Improving the Efficiency of Reasoning Through Structure-Based Reformulation
Abstract. We investigate the possibility of improving the efficiency of reasoning through structure-based partitioning of logical theories, combined with partitionbased logical reasoning strategies. To this end, we provide algorithms for reasoning with partitions of axioms in first-order and propositional logic. We analyze the computational benefit of our algorithms and detect those parameters of a partitioning that influence the efficiency of computation. These parameters are the number of symbols shared by a pair of partitions, the size of each partition, and the topology of the partitioning. Finally, we provide a greedy algorithm that automatically reformulates a given theory into partitions, exploiting the parameters that influence the efficiency of computation.
Comparative chondrogenesis of human cells in a 3D integrated experimental/computational mechanobiology model
We present an integrated experimental–computational
mechanobiology model of chondrogenesis. The
response of human articular chondrocytes to culture medium
perfusion, versus perfusion associated with cyclic pressurisation,
versus non-perfused culture, was compared in a pellet
culture model, and multiphysic computation was used
to quantify oxygen transport and flow dynamics in the various
culture conditions. At 2 weeks of culture, the measured
cell metabolic activity and the matrix content in
collagen type II and aggrecan were greatest in the perfused+
pressurised pellets. The main effects of perfusion
alone, relative to static controls, were to suppress collagen
type I and GAG contents, which were greatest in
the non-perfused pellets. All pellets showed a peripheral
layer of proliferating cells, which was thickest in the perfused
pellets, and most pellets showed internal gradients
in cell density and matrix composition. In perfused pellets,
the computed lowest oxygen concentration was 0.075mM
(7.5% tension), the maximal oxygen flux was
477.5 nmol/m2/s and the maximal fluid shear stress, acting
on the pellet surface, was 1.8mPa (0.018 dyn/cm2). In the
non-perfused pellets, the lowest oxygen concentration was
0.003mM (0.3% tension) and the maximal oxygen flux was
102.4nmol/m2/s.Alocal correlationwas observed, between
the gradients in pellet properties obtained from histology,
and the oxygen fields calculated with multiphysic simulation.
Our results showup-regulation of hyalinematrix protein
production by human chondrocytes in response to perfusion
associated with cyclic pressurisation. These results could be
favourably exploited in tissue engineering applications
An inexpensive nonlinear medium for intense ultrabroadband pulse characterization
The ability of pellets made up of compressed iron iodate nanocrystals to frequency-double the whole visible spectrum is demonstrated. We suggest their use for complete characterization of intense ultrabroadband laser pulse
Efficient Encodings of First-Order Horn Formulas in Equational Logic
We present several translations from first-order Horn formulas to equational logic. The goal of these translations is to allow equational theorem provers to efficiently reason about non-equational problems. Using these translations we were able to solve 37 problems of rating 1.0 (i.e. which had not previously been automatically solved) from the TPTP
New results on rewrite-based satisfiability procedures
Program analysis and verification require decision procedures to reason on
theories of data structures. Many problems can be reduced to the satisfiability
of sets of ground literals in theory T. If a sound and complete inference
system for first-order logic is guaranteed to terminate on T-satisfiability
problems, any theorem-proving strategy with that system and a fair search plan
is a T-satisfiability procedure. We prove termination of a rewrite-based
first-order engine on the theories of records, integer offsets, integer offsets
modulo and lists. We give a modularity theorem stating sufficient conditions
for termination on a combinations of theories, given termination on each. The
above theories, as well as others, satisfy these conditions. We introduce
several sets of benchmarks on these theories and their combinations, including
both parametric synthetic benchmarks to test scalability, and real-world
problems to test performances on huge sets of literals. We compare the
rewrite-based theorem prover E with the validity checkers CVC and CVC Lite.
Contrary to the folklore that a general-purpose prover cannot compete with
reasoners with built-in theories, the experiments are overall favorable to the
theorem prover, showing that not only the rewriting approach is elegant and
conceptually simple, but has important practical implications.Comment: To appear in the ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 49 page
Hierarchic Superposition Revisited
Many applications of automated deduction require reasoning in first-order
logic modulo background theories, in particular some form of integer
arithmetic. A major unsolved research challenge is to design theorem provers
that are "reasonably complete" even in the presence of free function symbols
ranging into a background theory sort. The hierarchic superposition calculus of
Bachmair, Ganzinger, and Waldmann already supports such symbols, but, as we
demonstrate, not optimally. This paper aims to rectify the situation by
introducing a novel form of clause abstraction, a core component in the
hierarchic superposition calculus for transforming clauses into a form needed
for internal operation. We argue for the benefits of the resulting calculus and
provide two new completeness results: one for the fragment where all
background-sorted terms are ground and another one for a special case of linear
(integer or rational) arithmetic as a background theory
- …