2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. Our objective was to update the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), based on emerging new evidence. We performed a systematic literature review (01/2007-12/2017), followed by modified Delphi method, to form questions, elicit expert opinions and reach consensus. Treatment in SLE aims at remission or low disease activity and prevention of flares. Hydroxychloroquine is recommended in all patients with lupus, at a dose not exceeding 5 mg/kg real body weight. During chronic maintenance treatment, glucocorticoids (GC) should be minimised to less than 7.5 mg/day (prednisone equivalent) and, when possible, withdrawn. Appropriate initiation of immunomodulatory agents (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate) can expedite the tapering/discontinuation of GC. In persistently active or flaring extrarenal disease, add-on belimumab should be considered; rituximab (RTX) may be considered in organ-threatening, refractory disease. Updated specific recommendations are also provided for cutaneous, neuropsychiatric, haematological and renal disease. Patients with SLE should be assessed for their antiphospholipid antibody status, infectious and cardiovascular diseases risk profile and preventative strategies be tailored accordingly. The updated recommendations provide physicians and patients with updated consensus guidance on the management of SLE, combining evidence-base and expert-opinion

Heart failure in chronic kidney disease: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

The incidence and prevalence of heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are increasing, and as such a better understanding of the interface between both conditions is imperative for developing optimal strategies for their detection, prevention, diagnosis, and management. To this end, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) convened an international, multidisciplinary Controversies Conference titled Heart Failure in CKD. Breakout group discussions included (i) HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and nondialysis CKD, (ii) HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and nondialysis CKD, (iii) HFpEF and dialysis-dependent CKD, (iv) HFrEF and dialysis-dependent CKD, and (v) HF in kidney transplant patients. The questions that formed the basis of discussions are available on the KDIGO website http://kdigo.org/conferences/heart-failure-in-ckd/, and the deliberations from the conference are summarized her

Treatment of American tegumentary leishmaniasis in special populations : a summary of evidence

We aimed to assess and synthesize the information available in the literature regarding the treatment of American tegumentary leishmaniasis in special populations. We searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, LILACS, SciELO, Scopus, Cochrane Library and mRCT databases to identify clinical trials and observational studies that assessed the pharmacological treatment of the following groups of patients: pregnant women, nursing mothers, children, the elderly, individuals with chronic diseases and individuals with suppressed immune systems. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. The available evidence suggests that the treatments of choice for each population or disease entity are as follows: nursing mothers and children (meglumine antimoniate or pentamidine), patients with renal disease (amphotericin B or miltefosine), patients with heart disease (amphotericin B, miltefosine or pentamidine), immunosuppressed patients (liposomal amphotericin), the elderly (meglumine antimoniate), pregnant women (amphotericin B) and patients with liver disease (no evidence available). The quality of evidence is low or very low for all groups. Accurate controlled studies are required to fill in the gaps in evidence for treatment in special populations. Post-marketing surveillance programs could also collect relevant information to guide treatment decision-making

Rituximab anti-B-cell therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus: pointing to the future

Purpose of review To discuss the clinical effects and the immunologic consequences of transient B-cell depletion using the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab in systemic lupus erythematosus. Recent findings A total of 100 rituximab-treated patients with severe disease, refractory to major immunosuppressive treatment, have been reported so far. Within a median follow-up period of 12 months rituximab was well tolerated, which is compatible with the experience accumulated from its use in more than 500 000 lymphoma patients. About 80% of patients achieved marked and rapid reductions in global disease activity. Because of the clinical heterogeneity, dosing differences, and concomitant treatments, including cyclophosphamide in 35% of patients, a proper evaluation of the clinical efficacy or rituximab is difficult. Variable degrees of clinical benefit have been reported for all clinical systemic lupus erythematosus manifestations, including active proliferative nephritis. Whereas 4-weekly infusions of 375 mg/m(2) of rituximab result in complete B-cell depletion lasting most often from 3 to 8 months, a prolonged depletion does not always correlate with a more favorable clinical response. Total immunoglobulin levels and protective antibodies are preserved, but anti-dsDNA antibody titers decrease, often independently of the clinical response. Summary The findings reviewed point to a growing optimism for targeting B cells in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus; therefore double-blind studies comparing rituximab with existing immunosuppressive therapies are needed. Moreover, careful assessments of the effects of transient B-cell depletion on distinct autoimmune pathogenetic processes will enable optimization of therapeutic single or combined therapeutic schemes

Intravenous immunoglobulin compared with cyclophosphamide for proliferative lupus nephritis

Among 14 randomised patients with proliferative lupus nephritis, monthly intravenous immunoglobulin maintained remission over 18 months, similar to standard intravenous cyclophosphamide treatment. Pulsed immunoglobulin may be a useful alternative therapy in lupus nephritis

Lupus nephritis: treatment with mycophenolate mofetil

Objective. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment in patients with lupus nephritis. Methods. Eighteen patients with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis (17 females, one male; mean age 31.6 yr; mean lupus duration 92 months; mean duration of nephritis 57 months; nine with focal proliferative glomerulonephritis, three with diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis, six with membranous nephropathy) were included. With five exceptions, all patients had been treated previously with cyclophosphamide and were selected because of either toxicity or inadequate clinical response to treatment. MMF was given at 2 g daily in combination with steroids for up to 31months (mean 15.3 months). The side-effects of MMF were recorded and efficacy was assessed as the renal function profile. Results. Complete remission was observed in 10/18 patients and another 4/18 went into partial remission. Both creatinine clearance and proteinuria were significantly improved during MMF treatment in patients with the proliferative forms of nephritis. MMF demonstrated a steroid-sparing effect in the whole population. Treatment failure was recorded in 4/18 patients, all with membranous nephropathy. Two patients developed gastrointestinal complaints and infectious meningitis occurred in one patient. Conclusion. MMF appears to be an efficacious and safe treatment in patients with proliferative forms of lupus nephritis who do not respond to or cannot tolerate conventional treatment. The efficacy of MMF in lupus membranous nephropathy remains unclear

Visceral leishmaniasis in renal transplant recipients: Successful treatment with liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome)

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a rare disease in renal transplant recipients. Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) is known to be effective against VL. However,previously there has been no experience with administration of such treatment to renal transplant recipients. We report herein four patients with VL complicating renal transplantation who were treated successfully with liposomal amphotericin B (total dose, 23-40 mg/kg). Neither adverse reactions nor clinical relapses of VL were observed