Functional analysis of Arabidopsis immune-related MAPKs uncovers a role for MPK3 as negative regulator of inducible defences

Background : Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) are key regulators of immune responses in animals and plants. In Arabidopsis, perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) activates the MAPKs MPK3, MPK4 and MPK6. Increasing information depicts the molecular events activated by MAMPs in plants, but the specific and cooperative contributions of the MAPKs in these signalling events are largely unclear.[br/] Results: In this work, we analyse the behaviour of MPK3, MPK4 and MPK6 mutants in early and late immune responses triggered by the MAMP flg22 from bacterial flagellin. A genome-wide transcriptome analysis reveals that 36% of the flg22-upregulated genes and 68% of the flg22-downregulated genes are affected in at least one MAPK mutant. So far MPK4 was considered as a negative regulator of immunity, whereas MPK3 and MPK6 were believed to play partially redundant positive functions in defence.[br/] Our work reveals that MPK4 is required for the regulation of approximately 50% of flg22-induced genes and we identify a negative role for MPK3 in regulating defence gene expression, flg22-induced salicylic acid accumulation and disease resistance to Pseudomonas syringae. Among the MAPK-dependent genes, 27% of flg22-upregulated genes and 76% of flg22-downregulated genes require two or three MAPKs for their regulation. The flg22-induced MAPK activities are differentially regulated in MPK3 and MPK6 mutants, both in amplitude and duration, revealing a highly interdependent network.[br/] Conclusions : These data reveal a new set of distinct functions for MPK3, MPK4 and MPK6 and indicate that the plant immune signalling network is choreographed through the interplay of these three interwoven MAPK pathways

Rapid protein evolution, organellar reductions, and invasive intronic elements in the marine aerobic parasite dinoflagellate Amoebophrya spp

BACKGROUND : Dinoflagellates are aquatic protists particularly widespread in the oceans worldwide. Some are responsible for toxic blooms while others live in symbiotic relationships, either as mutualistic symbionts in corals or as parasites infecting other protists and animals. Dinoflagellates harbor atypically large genomes (~ 3 to 250 Gb), with gene organization and gene expression patterns very different from closely related apicomplexan parasites. Here we sequenced and analyzed the genomes of two early-diverging and co-occurring parasitic dinoflagellate Amoebophrya strains, to shed light on the emergence of such atypical genomic features, dinoflagellate evolution, and host specialization. RESULTS : We sequenced, assembled, and annotated high-quality genomes for two Amoebophrya strains (A25 and A120), using a combination of Illumina paired-end short-read and Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) MinION long-read sequencing approaches. We found a small number of transposable elements, along with short introns and intergenic regions, and a limited number of gene families, together contribute to the compactness of the Amoebophrya genomes, a feature potentially linked with parasitism. While the majority of Amoebophrya proteins (63.7% of A25 and 59.3% of A120) had no functional assignment, we found many orthologs shared with Dinophyceae. Our analyses revealed a strong tendency for genes encoded by unidirectional clusters and high levels of synteny conservation between the two genomes despite low interspecific protein sequence similarity, suggesting rapid protein evolution. Most strikingly, we identified a large portion of non-canonical introns, including repeated introns, displaying a broad variability of associated splicing motifs never observed among eukaryotes. Those introner elements appear to have the capacity to spread over their respective genomes in a manner similar to transposable elements. Finally, we confirmed the reduction of organelles observed in Amoebophrya spp., i.e., loss of the plastid, potential loss of a mitochondrial genome and functions. CONCLUSION : These results expand the range of atypical genome features found in basal dinoflagellates and raise questions regarding speciation and the evolutionary mechanisms at play while parastitism was selected for in this particular unicellular lineage.ADDITIONAL FILE 1: FIGURE S1. Phylogeny of Alveolata. Proteomes from 89 alveolates genomes and transcriptome assemblies from the MMETSP project (https://zenodo.org/record/257026/files/) were used to create orthologous groups using orthofinder v2.2 with the diamond BLAST similarity search. Single ortholog alignments were pruned using PhyloTreePruner v.1.0 (minimum taxa to keep 44 and support value 0.9) and realigned using mafft v7 and filtered with Gblocks v.0.91b (−b5 = a -p = n). Filtered alignments were concatenated using seqCat.pl and a phylogenetic tree was produced under Maximum Likelihood framework using RAxML v8.2.9 with the PROTGAMMALGF model of sequence evolution and 101 bootstraps. Asterics represent support values of 95 and above. A detailed method can be found in Kayal et al. 2018 BMC Evol. Biol. (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1142-0). The full tree can be found at http://mmo.sb-roscoff.fr/jbrowseAmoebophrya/. FIGURE S2. SSU rDNA sequence identity (in percentage, relative to A25 and A120 compared to other species). FIGURE S3. Distribution of k-mer in A25 and A120 genomes. FIGURE S4. Classification of repeated elements in 3 Amoebophrya genomes (AT5, A25, and A120) using REPET. The x-axis represents the cumulated number of bases of repeated elements in the genome. FIGURE S5. Conserved motif of the putative splice leader (SL) in A25 and A120. FIGURE S6. Alignments of gene encoding the putative spliced leader (SL) gene in A25 and A120. FIGURE S7. Gene orientation change rate in 3 Amoebophrya genomes. FIGURE S8. Number of orthologs genes shared by selected taxa. FIGURE S9. Boxplot of the dN/dS ratios of orthologous genes between A25 and A120, calculated using the model average method (MA). FIGURE S10. Synteny dot-plot obtained by comparison between Amoebophrya A25 and AT5 genomes. FIGURE S11. Synteny dot-plot obtained by comparison between Amoebophrya A120 and AT5 genomes. FIGURE S12. Intron length distribution. FIGURE S13. GC content distribution. FIGURE S14. Multiple alignments of U2 snRNAs. FIGURE S15. Multiple alignments of U4 snRNAs. FIGURE S16. Multiple alignments of U5 snRNAs. FIGURE S17. Multiple alignments of U6 snRNAs. FIGURE S18. Secondary structure of Amoebophrya snRNA. FIGURE S19. Example of introner elements (IEs) in Amoebophrya. FIGURE S20. Distribution the direct repeats with size ranging between 3 and 8 nucleotides in A25. FIGURE S21. Distribution of the direct repeats with size ranging between 3 and 8 nucleotides in A120. FIGURE S22. Composition of direct repeats in introners elements. The diversity in composition of the three (a, b, c) most abundant of direct repeats in introner elements in A25 (up) and A120 (down). FIGURE S23. Terminal inverted repeat locations around the splicing sites in A25 and A120. The position of inverted repeats according to the location of the splice sites in A25 and A120. Left, the inverted repeats of A120 are located at 1–5 the nucleotides upstream and downstream of the splice sites. Right, the inverted repeats of A25 are located at the 1–6 nucleotides in upstream and downstream of the splice sites. FIGURE S24. The flowchart for the in silico search of introner elements. FIGURE S25. Hierarchical clustering analysis (pairwise similarity and OrthoMCL) of all intron families and of the inverted repeats in A25 and A120. FIGURE S26. Percentage of genes with assigned functions in relation with introns composition. FIGURE S27. Difference in the proportion of IEs-containing-genes compared to their KEGG assignment in A25 and A120. FIGURE S28. Distribution of conserved introns. TABLE S1. RCC number, date and site of isolation of strains considered in this study. TABLE S2. Metrics of Nanopore runs for the two Amoebophrya strains. TABLE S3. Search for pathways involved in plastidial functions that are entirely independent of plastid-encoded gene content. TABLE S4. Number of the different types of introns identified in A25 and A120 genomes. TABLE S5. Search for RNA editing in A25 and A120 introns. TABLE S6. Putative Amoebophrya A25 and A120 snRNP homologs. TABLE S7. Classification into families of non-canonical introns in A25 and A120. TABLE S8. RNAseq read assembly statistics of Amoebophrya A25 and A120 corresponding samples from the different time of infection and to the freeliving stage (dinospore only). TABLE S9. Total number of contigs belonging to samples from different stages of infection and the proportion of them that were aligned against the genomes of both Amoebophrya A25 and A120. ND corresponds to “not determined” when no measurement was done. TABLE S10. Metabolic pathway screened in A25 and A120 proteomes.This research was funded by the ANR (Agence Nationale de la Recherche) Grant ANR-14-CE02-0007 HAPAR, the CEA and the Région Bretagne (RC doctoral grant ARED PARASITE 9450 and EK postdoctoral grant SAD HAPAR 9229), and the CNRS (X-life SEAgOInG).http://www.mdpi.com/journal/biomedicinesam2022BiochemistryGeneticsMicrobiology and Plant Patholog

Rapid protein evolution, organellar reductions, and invasive intronic elements in the marine aerobic parasite dinoflagellate Amoebophrya spp

Background: Dinoflagellates are aquatic protists particularly widespread in the oceans worldwide. Some are responsible for toxic blooms while others live in symbiotic relationships, either as mutualistic symbionts in corals or as parasites infecting other protists and animals. Dinoflagellates harbor atypically large genomes (similar to 3 to 250 Gb), with gene organization and gene expression patterns very different from closely related apicomplexan parasites. Here we sequenced and analyzed the genomes of two early-diverging and co-occurring parasitic dinoflagellate Amoebophrya strains, to shed light on the emergence of such atypical genomic features, dinoflagellate evolution, and host specialization. Results: We sequenced, assembled, and annotated high-quality genomes for two Amoebophrya strains (A25 and A120), using a combination of Illumina paired-end short-read and Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) MinION long-read sequencing approaches. We found a small number of transposable elements, along with short introns and intergenic regions, and a limited number of gene families, together contribute to the compactness of the Amoebophrya genomes, a feature potentially linked with parasitism. While the majority of Amoebophrya proteins (63.7% of A25 and 59.3% of A120) had no functional assignment, we found many orthologs shared with Dinophyceae. Our analyses revealed a strong tendency for genes encoded by unidirectional clusters and high levels of synteny conservation between the two genomes despite low interspecific protein sequence similarity, suggesting rapid protein evolution. Most strikingly, we identified a large portion of non-canonical introns, including repeated introns, displaying a broad variability of associated splicing motifs never observed among eukaryotes. Those introner elements appear to have the capacity to spread over their respective genomes in a manner similar to transposable elements. Finally, we confirmed the reduction of organelles observed in Amoebophrya spp., i.e., loss of the plastid, potential loss of a mitochondrial genome and functions. Conclusion: These results expand the range of atypical genome features found in basal dinoflagellates and raise questions regarding speciation and the evolutionary mechanisms at play while parastitism was selected for in this particular unicellular lineage

Nuclear Signaling of Plant MAPKs

Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) are conserved protein kinases in eukaryotes that establish signaling modules where MAPK kinase kinases (MAPKKKs) activate MAPK kinases (MAPKKs) which in turn activate MAPKs. In plants, they are involved in the signaling of multiple environmental stresses and developmental programs. MAPKs phosphorylate their substrates and this post-translational modification (PTM) contributes to the regulation of proteins. PTMs may indeed modify the activity, subcellular localization, stability or trans-interactions of modified proteins. Plant MAPKs usually localize to the cytosol and/or nucleus, and in some instances they may also translocate from the cytosol to the nucleus. Upon the detection of environmental changes at the cell surface, MAPKs participate in the signal transduction to the nucleus, allowing an adequate transcriptional reprogramming. The identification of plant MAPK substrates largely contributed to a better understanding of the underlying signaling mechanisms. In this review, we highlight the nuclear signaling of plant MAPKs. We discuss the activation, regulation and activity of plant MAPKs, as well as their nuclear re-localization. We also describe and discuss known nuclear substrates of plant MAPKs in the context of biotic stress, abiotic stress and development and consider future research directions in the field of plant MAPKs

Rôle et régulation des MAPKinases dans la signalisation induite par les pathogènes chez Arabidopsis thaliana

Les plantes induisent des réponses de défense après la perception de pathogènes. Des protéines appelées mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKS) sont impliquées dans le réseau complexe de signalisation établi pendant cette défense. Cependant, la connaissance actuelle de leur fonction est encore limitée. L'objectif de ma thèse était de contribuer à une meilleure compréhension de leur rôle et régulation pendant la défense. Premièrement, j'ai participé au décryptage des contributions spécifiques et coopératives de trois MAPKS impliquées dans l'immunité, à savoir MPK3, MPK4 et MPK6. Nous avons montré que ces MAPKS sont d'importants régulateurs de la reprogrammation transcriptionnelle induite pendant la défense. Deuxièmement, nous avons réalisé des approches de phosphoprotéomique et nous avons développé un protocole permettant d'enrichir des protéines associés à la chromatine, ce qui a permis d'identifier de nouveaux phosphosites ainsi que des protéines différemment phosphorylées pendant la défense, notamment de probables substrats des MAPKS. Troisièmement, nous avons identifiés plusieurs dizaines de protéines interagissant potentiellement avec le module MEKKI-MKK2-MPK4. Globalement, ce travail a révélé de nouvelles fonctions des MAPKS dans l'immunité des plantes. Ce travail a aussi permis d'identifier de nouveaux substrats potentiels des MAPKS et suggère que le module MEKK1-MKK2-MPK4 est soumis à une régulation hautement complexe via de multiples interacteurs proétiques et PTMS.Plants induce defense responses after perception of invading pathogens. Proteins called mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKS) are implicated in the complex signaling network occuring in plant immunity. However, the current knowledge of their function is still limited. The objective of my PHD was to contribute to a better understanding of their role and regulation in plant defense. First, i was involved in the deciphering of the specific and cooperative contributions of three MAPKS involved in plant immunity, namely MPK3, MPK4 and MPK6. We charcacterized several hallmarks of defense in WT and MAPK mutant plants. We showed notably that immune MAPKS are important regulators of the transcriptional reprogramming occuring during defense. Second, we applied phosphoproteomic approaches and we developed a protocol to enrich for chromatin-associated proteins which allowed identifying new phosphosites as well as proteins differentially phosphorylated during defense, notably some probable MAPKS substrates. Third, we identified several tens proteins potentially interacting with the immune MEKK1-MKK2-MPK4 module via the purification of protein complexes in vivo. Fourth, we identified diverse post-translational modification (PTMS) on each component of the MEKK1-MKK2-MPK4 module. Overall, this work revealed new functions for MAPKS in plant immunity. This work also provided new candidate MAPK substrates and suggests that the MEKK1-MKK2-MPK4 module is subjected to a highly complex regulation via multiple interacting proteins and PTMS

Nuclear Signaling of Plant MAPKs

This article is part of the research topic: Post-Translational Modifications in Plant Nuclear Signaling: Novel Insights into Responses to Environmental ChangesInternational audienceMitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) are conserved protein kinases in eukaryotes that establish signaling modules where MAPK kinase kinases (MAPKKKs) activate MAPK kinases (MAPKKs) which in turn activate MAPKs. In plants, they are involved in the signaling of multiple environmental stresses and developmental programs. MAPKs phosphorylate their substrates and this post-translational modification (PTM) contributes to the regulation of proteins. PTMs may indeed modify the activity, subcellular localization, stability or trans-interactions of modified proteins. Plant MAPKs usually localize to the cytosol and/or nucleus, and in some instances they may also translocate from the cytosol to the nucleus. Upon the detection of environmental changes at the cell surface, MAPKs participate in the signal transduction to the nucleus, allowing an adequate transcriptional reprogramming. The identification of plant MAPK substrates largely contributed to a better understanding of the underlying signaling mechanisms. In this review, we highlight the nuclear signaling of plant MAPKs. We discuss the activation, regulation and activity of plant MAPKs, as well as their nuclear re-localization. We also describe and discuss known nuclear substrates of plant MAPKs in the context of biotic stress, abiotic stress and development and consider future research directions in the field of plant MAPKs

Signaling mechanisms in pattern-triggered immunity (PTI)

International audienceIn nature, plants constantly have to face pathogen attacks. However, plant disease rarely occurs due to efficient immune systems possessed by the host plants. Pathogens are perceived by two different recognition systems that initiate the so-called pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI), both of which are accompanied by a set of induced defenses that usually repel pathogen attacks. Here we discuss the complex network of signaling pathways occurring during PTI, focusing on the involvement of mitogen-activated protein kinases

Plant immunity: The mti-emodel and beyond

In plant-microbe interactions, a pathogenic microbe initially has to overcome preformed and subsequently induced plant defenses. One of the initial host-induced defense responses is microbe-associated molecular pattern (MAMP)-triggered immunity (MTI). Successful pathogens attenuate MTI by delivering various effectors that result in effector-triggered susceptibility and disease. However, some host plants developed mechanisms to detect effectors and can trigger effector-triggered immunity (ETI), thereby abrogating pathogen infection and propagation. Despite the wide acceptance of the above concepts, more and more accumulating evidence suggests that the distinction between MAMPs and effectors and MTI and ETI is often not given. This review discusses the complexity of MTI and ETI signaling networks and elaborates the current state of the art of defining MAMPs versus effectors and MTI versus ETI, but also discusses new findings that challenge the current dichotomy of these concepts

Rift Valley fever in a zone potentially occupied by Aedes vexans in Senegal: dynamics and risk mapping

This paper presents an analysis of the interaction between the various variables associated with Rift Valley fever (RVF) such as the mosquito vector, available hosts and rainfall distribution. To that end, the varying zones potentially occupied by mosquitoes (ZPOM), rainfall events and pond dynamics, and the associated exposure of hosts to the RVF virus by Aedes vexans, were analyzed in the Barkedji area of the Ferlo, Senegal, during the 2003 rainy season. Ponds were identified by remote sensing using a high-resolution SPOT-5 satellite image. Additional data on ponds and rainfall events from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission were combined with in-situ entomological and limnimetric measurements, and the localization of vulnerable ruminant hosts (data derived from QuickBird satellite). Since “Ae. vexans productive events” are dependent on the timing of rainfall for their embryogenesis (six days without rain are necessary to trigger hatching), the dynamic spatio-temporal distribution of Ae. vexans density was based on the total rainfall amount and pond dynamics. Detailed ZPOM mapping was obtained on a daily basis and combined with aggressiveness temporal profiles. Risks zones, i.e. zones where hazards and vulnerability are combined, are expressed by the percentages of parks where animals are potentially exposed to mosquito bites. This new approach, simply relying upon rainfall distribution evaluated from space, is meant to contribute to the implementation of a new, operational early warning system for RVF based on environmental risks linked to climatic and environmental conditions