Variable Rate Irrigation Using a Spatial Evapotranspiration Model With Remote Sensing Imagery and Soil Water Content Measurements

Variable rate irrigation may help in intensification of agriculture by producing more yield per unit inputs. Real time spatial information about water balance components is important for designing VRI prescription maps. This work involved use of a spatial evapotranspiration model for studying spatial variability in an agricultural field at the Eastern Nebraska Research and Extension Center near Mead, Nebraska. Imagery from unmanned aerial systems and Landsat were used as input for the spatial evapotranspiration model. Other inputs into the model were soil water content measurements from neutron probes, weather data, crop data, previous irrigation prescriptions, and soil properties for the field. The work included comparison of VRI treatments with uniform irrigation and rainfed treatments in terms of yield potential and reduced water withdrawal. Uniform irrigation methods included uniform irrigation managed using soil water content measurements from neutron probe and rainfed treatment. The model was updated and improved during the study period in attempt to more accurately model water balance components and manage VRI. Mean total prescribed irrigation depth was significantly larger for VRI using Landsat than uniform treatments for soybean in 2017. It was significantly lower for VRI using Landsat than other irrigated treatments for soybean in 2018. Maize yield in 2017 was significantly greater for VRI using Landsat and uniform treatments than the rainfed treatment. No other significant yield differences were observed in 2017 and 2018. Future research may focus on inclusion of thermal infrared UAS imagery, and an advanced method soil water content measurements in the model. Advisor: Derek M. Heere

Variable Rate Irrigation of Maize and Soybean in West-Central Nebraska under Full and Deficit Irrigation

Variable rate irrigation (VRI) may improve center pivot irrigation management, including deficit irrigation. A remote-sensing-based evapotranspiration model was implemented with Landsat imagery to manage irrigations for a VRI equipped center pivot irrigated field located in West-Central Nebraska planted to maize in 2017 and soybean in 2018. In 2017, the study included VRI using the model, and uniform irrigation using neutron attenuation for full irrigation with no intended water stress (VRI-Full and Uniform-Full treatments, respectively). In 2018, two deficit irrigation treatments were added (VRI-Deficit and Uniform-Deficit, respectively) and the model was modified in an attempt to reduce water balance drift; model performance was promising, as it was executed unaided by measurements of soil water content throughout the season. VRI prescriptions did not correlate well with available water capacity (R2 \u3c 0.4); however, they correlated better with modeled ET in 2018 (R2 = 0. 69, VRI-Full; R2 = 0.55, VRI-Deficit). No significant differences were observed in total intended gross irrigation depth in 2017 (VRI-Full = 351mm, Uniform Full = 344). However, in 2018, VRI resulted in lower mean prescribed gross irrigation than the corresponding uniform treatments (VRI-Full = 265mm, Uniform Full = 282mm, VRI-Deficit = 234mm, and Uniform Deficit = 267mm). Notwithstanding the differences in prescribed irrigation (in 2018), VRI did not affect dry grain yield, with no statistically significant differences being found between any treatments in either year (F = 0.03, p = 0.87 in 2017; F = 0.00, p = 0.96 for VRI/Uniform and F = 0.01, p = 0.93 for Full/Deficit in 2018). Likewise, any reduction in irrigation application apparently did not result in detectable reductions in deep percolation potential or actual evapotranspiration. Additional research is needed to further vet the model as a deficit irrigation management tool. Suggested model improvements include a continuous function for water stress and an optimization routine in computing the basal crop coefficient

Sprinkler irrigation system field checklist

This recommendation came out of a noted need by the ASABE NRES-241 sprinkler irrigation committee in 2019 committee meeting for a simple checklist to quickly educate new center pivot operators on what to look for to determine if a center pivot is operating at designed performance. This checklist is meant to be simple and user friendly. Simple and clear language was incorporated purposefully. It is intended as a quick guide to new irrigators, or as a reminder to more experienced irrigators as to what to check to ensure efficient and effective center pivot and linear move irrigation system operation for optimal performance. Different checklists were developed for various frequencies of system evaluation. This was done as a cooperative project of the sprinkler irrigation committee members as an outcome of this stated need. It is hoped that this checklist can be adapted and used by growers, consultants, and other irrigators

Toward automated irrigation management with integrated crop water stress index and spatial soil water balance

Decision support systems intended for precision irrigation aim at reducing irrigation applications while optimizing crop yield to achieve maximum crop water productivity (CWP). These systems incorporate on-site sensor data, remote sensing inputs, and advanced algorithms with spatial and temporal characteristics to compute precise crop water needs. The availability of variable rate irrigation (VRI) systems enables irrigation applications at a sub-field scale. The combination of an appropriate VRI system along with a precise decision support system would be ideal for improved CWP. The objective of this study was to compare and evaluate two decision support systems in terms of seasonal applied irrigation, crop yield, and CWP. This study implemented the Spatial EvapoTranspiration Modeling Interface (SETMI) model and the Irrigation Scheduling Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (ISSCADA) system for management of a center pivot irrigation system in a 58-ha maize-soybean field during the 2020 and 2021 growing seasons. The irrigation scheduling methods included: ISSCADA plant feedback, ISSCADA hybrid, common practice, and SETMI. These methods were applied at irrigation levels of 0, 50, 100, and 150% of the full irrigation prescribed by the respective irrigation scheduling method. Data from infrared thermometers (IRTs), soil water sensors, weather stations, and satellites were used in the irrigation methods. Mean seasonal irrigation prescribed was different among the irrigation levels and methods for the 2 years. The ISSCADA plant feedback prescribed the least irrigation among the methods for majority of the cases. The common practice prescribed the largest seasonal irrigation depth among the methods for three crop-year cases. The maize yield in rainfed was found to be significantly lower than the irrigated levels in 2020 since 2020 was a dry year. No significant differences were observed in crop yield among the different irrigation methods for both years. The CWP among the different irrigation methods ranged between 2.72 and 3.15 kg m−3 for 2020 maize, 1.03 and 1.13 kg m−3 for 2020 soybean, 3.57 and 4.24 kg m−3 for 2021 maize, and 1.19 and 1.48 kg m−3 for 2021 soybean. Deficit level (50%) had the largest irrigation water productivity in all crop-year cases in this study. The ISSCADA and SETMI systems were found to reduce irrigation applications as compared to the common practice while maintaining crop yield. This study was the first to implement the newly developed integrated crop water stress index (iCWSI) thresholds and the ISSCADA system for site-specific irrigation of maize and soybean in Nebraska

Toward automated irrigation management with integrated crop water stress index and spatial soil water balance

Decision support systems intended for precision irrigation aim at reducing irrigation applications while optimizing crop yield to achieve maximum crop water productivity (CWP). These systems incorporate on-site sensor data, remote sensing inputs, and advanced algorithms with spatial and temporal characteristics to compute precise crop water needs. The availability of variable rate irrigation (VRI) systems enables irrigation applications at a sub-field scale. The combination of an appropriate VRI system along with a precise decision support system would be ideal for improved CWP. The objective of this study was to compare and evaluate two decision support systems in terms of seasonal applied irrigation, crop yield, and CWP. This study implemented the Spatial EvapoTranspiration Modeling Interface (SETMI) model and the Irrigation Scheduling Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (ISSCADA) system for management of a center pivot irrigation system in a 58-ha maize-soybean field during the 2020 and 2021 growing seasons. The irrigation scheduling methods included: ISSCADA plant feedback, ISSCADA hybrid, common practice, and SETMI. These methods were applied at irrigation levels of 0, 50, 100, and 150% of the full irrigation prescribed by the respective irrigation scheduling method. Data from infrared thermometers (IRTs), soil water sensors, weather stations, and satellites were used in the irrigation methods. Mean seasonal irrigation prescribed was different among the irrigation levels and methods for the 2 years. The ISSCADA plant feedback prescribed the least irrigation among the methods for majority of the cases. The common practice prescribed the largest seasonal irrigation depth among the methods for three crop-year cases. The maize yield in rainfed was found to be significantly lower than the irrigated levels in 2020 since 2020 was a dry year. No significant differences were observed in crop yield among the different irrigation methods for both years. The CWP among the different irrigation methods ranged between 2.72 and 3.15 kg m−3 for 2020 maize, 1.03 and 1.13 kg m−3 for 2020 soybean, 3.57 and 4.24 kg m−3 for 2021 maize, and 1.19 and 1.48 kg m−3 for 2021 soybean. Deficit level (50%) had the largest irrigation water productivity in all crop-year cases in this study. The ISSCADA and SETMI systems were found to reduce irrigation applications as compared to the common practice while maintaining crop yield. This study was the first to implement the newly developed integrated crop water stress index (iCWSI) thresholds and the ISSCADA system for site-specific irrigation of maize and soybean in Nebraska

Comparison of stationary and mobile canopy sensing systems for irrigation management of maize and soybean in Nebraska

Accurate knowledge of plant and field characteristics is crucial for irrigation management. Irrigation can potentially be better managed by utilizing data collected from various sensors installed on different platforms. The accuracy and repeatability of each data source are important considerations when selecting a sensing system suitable for irrigation management. The objective of this study was to compare data from multispectral (red and near-infrared bands) and thermal (long wave thermal infrared band) sensors mounted on different platforms to investigate their comparative usability and accuracy. The different sensor platforms included stationary posts fixed on the ground, the lateral of a center pivot irrigation system, unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), and Planet (PlanetScope multispectral imager, Planet Labs, Inc., San Francisco, Calif.) satellites. The surface reflectance data from multispectral (MS) sensors were used to compute the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI). The experimental plots were managed with rainfed and irrigated treatments. Irrigation was applied according to a spatial evapotranspiration model informed with Planet satellite imagery. The NDVI and SAVI curves computed from the different sensing systems exhibited similar patterns and were able to capture differences between the rainfed and irrigated treatments when the crops were approaching senescence. Strong correlations were observed for canopy temperature measurements between the stationary and pivot-mounted infrared thermometer (IRT) sensors (p-value of less than 0.01 for the correlations) when canopy were scanned with no irrigation application (dry scans). The best correlation was obtained for the irrigated maize, which yielded r2 of 0.99, RMSE of 0.4°C, and MAE of 0.3°C. The correlation for the canopy temperature data collected during dry scan between UAS and pivot-mounted thermal sensors was weak with r2 = 0.26 to 0.28, larger RMSE values of 3.7°C and MAE values of 3.4°C. Secondary analysis between thermal data from stationary and pivot-mounted IRTs collected during wet scans (during an irrigation event) demonstrated reduced canopy temperature from pivot-mounted IRTs by approximately 2°C for irrigated soybean due to wetting of the canopy by the irrigation. Understanding the performance of these sensor systems is valuable in configuring practical design and operational considerations when using sensor feedback for irrigation management

Crop response to thermal stress without yield loss in irrigated maize and soybean in Nebraska

Thermal sensing provides rapid and accurate estimation of crop water stress through canopy temperature data. Canopy temperature is highly dependent on the transpiration rate of the leaves. It is usually assumed that any reduction in crop evapotranspiration (ET) leads to crop yield loss. As a result, an increase in canopy temperature due to a decrease in crop ET would indicate crop yield loss. This research evaluated the hypothesis that crop water stress could be detected using canopy temperature measurements (increased leaf temperature) from infrared thermometers (IRTs) before incurring crop yield loss. This would be possible in a narrow range when the photosynthesis rate (and carbon assimilation) is limited by solar radiation (energy-limiting water stress) while the leaf has abundant carbon dioxide for photosynthesis. Once photosynthesis becomes limited by carbon dioxide (carbon-dioxide-limiting water stress), then yield reduction would occur. In this field experiment, measured response variables included the integrated crop water stress index (iCWSI), ET, and crop yield for maize and soybean during the 2020 and 2021 growing seasons. The irrigation was applied at four different refill levels: rainfed (0%), deficit (50%), full (100%), and over (150%). The irrigation depth was prescribed using four different irrigation methods. The field was irrigated with a center pivot irrigation system, which was also used as a platform to mount IRT sensors. The iCWSI thresholds required for irrigation management were determined using the iCWSI dataset collected in 2020. The low, medium, and high iCWSI thresholds were 120, 150, and 180, respectively for maize and 110, 130, and 150, respectively for soybean. These thresholds should be updated with iCWSI data from future studies in this region to increase the credibility of the thresholds for irrigation management. The mean iCWSI values for consecutive days after a wetting event substantially increased with time for each irrigation level and a larger range in iCWSI values was observed among the irrigation levels after three days from a wetting event. The seasonal iCWSI for different levels were found to be negatively correlated with seasonal evapotranspiration for both years. The correlations between seasonal ET and crop yield were significant with the rainfed and deficit levels for maize (p-value \u3c 0.001) and soybean (p-value = 0.04) in 2020. The iCWSI and yield data for the fully watered plots indicated that thermal stress was detected using the sensing system without incurring yield loss (i.e., energy-limiting water stress). The ET and yield data for 2021 indicated that reduction in seasonal crop ET did not result in yield loss which also supported the hypothesis. Future studies should investigate whether this phenomenon of detecting crop water stress in an early stage without yield loss is observed in other climates and locations