206 research outputs found
Integrated Modeling and Verification of Real-Time Systems through Multiple Paradigms
Complex systems typically have many different parts and facets, with
different characteristics. In a multi-paradigm approach to modeling, formalisms
with different natures are used in combination to describe complementary parts
and aspects of the system. This can have a beneficial impact on the modeling
activity, as different paradigms an be better suited to describe different
aspects of the system. While each paradigm provides a different view on the
many facets of the system, it is of paramount importance that a coherent
comprehensive model emerges from the combination of the various partial
descriptions. In this paper we present a technique to model different aspects
of the same system with different formalisms, while keeping the various models
tightly integrated with one another. In addition, our approach leverages the
flexibility provided by a bounded satisfiability checker to encode the
verification problem of the integrated model in the propositional
satisfiability (SAT) problem; this allows users to carry out formal
verification activities both on the whole model and on parts thereof. The
effectiveness of the approach is illustrated through the example of a
monitoring system.Comment: 27 page
SMT-based Verification of LTL Specifications with Integer Constraints and its Application to Runtime Checking of Service Substitutability
An important problem that arises during the execution of service-based
applications concerns the ability to determine whether a running service can be
substituted with one with a different interface, for example if the former is
no longer available. Standard Bounded Model Checking techniques can be used to
perform this check, but they must be able to provide answers very quickly, lest
the check hampers the operativeness of the application, instead of aiding it.
The problem becomes even more complex when conversational services are
considered, i.e., services that expose operations that have Input/Output data
dependencies among them. In this paper we introduce a formal verification
technique for an extension of Linear Temporal Logic that allows users to
include in formulae constraints on integer variables. This technique applied to
the substitutability problem for conversational services is shown to be
considerably faster and with smaller memory footprint than existing ones
Deciding the Satisfiability of MITL Specifications
In this paper we present a satisfiability-preserving reduction from MITL
interpreted over finitely-variable continuous behaviors to Constraint LTL over
clocks, a variant of CLTL that is decidable, and for which an SMT-based bounded
satisfiability checker is available. The result is a new complete and effective
decision procedure for MITL. Although decision procedures for MITL already
exist, the automata-based techniques they employ appear to be very difficult to
realize in practice, and, to the best of our knowledge, no implementation
currently exists for them. A prototype tool for MITL based on the encoding
presented here has, instead, been implemented and is publicly available.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2013, arXiv:1307.416
Bounded Reachability for Temporal Logic over Constraint Systems
We present CLTLB(D), an extension of PLTLB (PLTL with both past and future
operators) augmented with atomic formulae built over a constraint system D.
Even for decidable constraint systems, satisfiability and Model Checking
problem of such logic can be undecidable. We introduce suitable restrictions
and assumptions that are shown to make the satisfiability problem for the
extended logic decidable. Moreover for a large class of constraint systems we
propose an encoding that realize an effective decision procedure for the
Bounded Reachability problem
Constraint LTL Satisfiability Checking without Automata
This paper introduces a novel technique to decide the satisfiability of
formulae written in the language of Linear Temporal Logic with Both future and
past operators and atomic formulae belonging to constraint system D (CLTLB(D)
for short). The technique is based on the concept of bounded satisfiability,
and hinges on an encoding of CLTLB(D) formulae into QF-EUD, the theory of
quantifier-free equality and uninterpreted functions combined with D. Similarly
to standard LTL, where bounded model-checking and SAT-solvers can be used as an
alternative to automata-theoretic approaches to model-checking, our approach
allows users to solve the satisfiability problem for CLTLB(D) formulae through
SMT-solving techniques, rather than by checking the emptiness of the language
of a suitable automaton A_{\phi}. The technique is effective, and it has been
implemented in our Zot formal verification tool.Comment: 39 page
Formal verification of storm topologies through D-VerT
Data-intensive applications (DIAs) based on so-called Big Data technologies are nowadays a common solution adopted by IT companies to face their growing computational needs. The need for highly reliable applications able to handle huge amounts of data and the availability of infrastructures for distributed computing rapidly led industries to develop frame-works for streaming and big-data processing, like Apache Storm and Spark. The definition of methodologies and principles for good software design is, therefore, fundamental to support the development of DIAs. This paper presents an approach for non-functional analysis of DIAs through D- VerT, a tool for the architectural assessment of Storm applications. The verification is based on a translation of Storm topologies into the CLTLoc metric temporal logic. It allows the designer of a Storm application to check for the existence of components that cannot process their workload in a timely manner, typically due to an incorrect design of the topology
- …