Gender Biases and Diagnostic Delay in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Multicenter Observational Study

Background: Female gender could be a cause of diagnostic delay in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic delay in women vs men and potential causes. Methods: This multicenter cohort study included 190 patients with recent diagnosis of IBD (disease duration <7 months). Reconstruction of the clinical presentation and diagnostic process was carried out in conjunction with the semistructured patient interview, review, and electronic medical records. Results: The median time from symptom onset to IBD diagnosis was longer in women than in men: 12.6 (interquartile range, 3.7-31) vs 4.5 (2.2-9.8) months for Crohn’s disease (CD; P = .008) and 6.1 (3-11.2) vs 2.7 (1.5-5.6) months for ulcerative colitis (UC; P = .008). Sex was an independent variable related to the time to IBD diagnosis in Cox regression analysis. The clinical presentation of IBD was similar in both sexes. Women had a higher percentage of misdiagnosis than men (CD, odds ratio [OR], 3.9; 95% confidence [CI], 1.5-9.9; UC, OR 3.0; 95% CI, 1.2-7.4). Gender inequities in misdiagnosis were found at all levels of the health system (emergency department, OR 2.4; 95% CI, 1.1-5.1; primary care, OR 2.5; 95% CI, 1.3-4.7; gastroenterology secondary care, OR 3.2; 95% CI, 1.2-8.4; and hospital admission, OR 4.3; 95% CI, 1.1-16.9). Conclusions: There is a longer diagnostic delay in women than in men for both CD and UC due to a drawn-out evaluation of women, with a higher number of misdiagnoses at all levels of the health care system.This study was supported by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI 18/01547), GETECCU (Grupo Español de Trabajo en Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Ulcerosa, Grant 2017) and SVPD (Sociedad Valenciana de Patología Digestiva, Grant 2017)

Effectiveness of a Multicomponent Group Psychological Intervention Program in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Randomized Trial

(1) Background: Stress, anxiety, and depression have been identified as factors that influence the development of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The main aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of group multicomponent cognitive-behavioral therapy at reducing stress, anxiety, and depression, and improving quality of life and the clinical course of the disease. (2) Methods: A total of 120 patients were evaluated using the General Perceived Stress Scale, Scale of Stress Perceived by the Disease, the anxiety and depression scale, and quality of life questionnaire for patients with IBD. Disease activity was measured using the Mayo Index for ulcerative colitis and CDAI for Crohn’s disease, as well as the number of relapses self-reported by patients. Patients were randomized to receive group multicomponent cognitive-behavioral therapy or treatment as usual. (3) Results: The psychological intervention reduced stress (EAE: 45.7 ± 8.8 vs. 40.6 ± 8.4, p = 0.0001; PSS: 28.0 ± 7.3 vs. 25.1 ± 5.9, p = 0.001) and improved quality of life (164.2 ± 34.3 vs. 176.2 ± 28.0, p = 0.001). An improvement was found in the number of relapses self-reported by patients (0.2 relapses/patient vs. control 0.7 relapses/patient; p = 0.027). No differences were found in disease activity indexes. (4) Conclusions: Psychological therapy was associated with improved stress, quality of life and with a decrease in the number of relapses self-reported by patients. Clinical trial registration number: NCT02614014

Evolución del impacto emocional en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal temprana durante y después del bloqueo de COVID-19

Background: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are vulnerable to some psychological disorders. Here we describe the psychological impact of a COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in patients with IBD. Methods: This multicenter prospective cohort study included 145 patients recently diagnosed with IBD. Data on clinical and demographic characteristics, anxiety and depression scales, and IBD activity were collected in two telephone surveys, during and after the first COVID-19 lockdown in Spain. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: During lockdown, 33.1% and 24.1% scored high on the anxiety and depression scales, respectively. Independent factors related to anxiety (all values ORs; 95% CIs) during lockdown were female sex (2; 1.2–5.4) and IBD activity (4.3; 1.8–10.4). Factors related to depression were comorbidity (3.3; 1.1–9.8), IBD activity (6; 1.9–18.1), use of biologics (2.9; 1.1–7.6), and living alone or with one person (3.1; 1.2–8.2). After lockdown, anxiety and depression symptoms showed significant improvement, with 24.8% and 15.2% having high scores for anxiety and depression, respectively. Factors related to post-lockdown anxiety were female sex (2.5; 1.01–6.3), Crohn’s disease (3.3; 1.3–8.5), and active IBD (4.1; 1.2–13.7). Factors associated with depression were previous history of mood and/or anxiety disorders (6.3; 1.6–24.9), active IBD (7.5; 2.1–26.8), and steroid use (6.4; 1.4–29). Conclusions: Lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic had a significant psychological impact in patients with IBD. Disease activity was related to the presence of anxiety and depression symptoms during and after lockdown.Antecedentes: Los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) son vulnerables a sufrir trastornos psicológicos. En este estudio describimos el impacto psicológico que ha supuesto el confinamiento durante el COVID-19 en pacientes con EII. Métodos: Este estudio de cohorte prospectivo multicéntrico se incluyeron 145 pacientes con diagnóstico de EII reciente. Los datos sobre las características clínicas y demográficas, las escalas de ansiedad y depresión y la actividad de la EII se recogieron en dos encuestas telefónicas, durante y después del primer confinamiento por COVID-19 en España. Se calcularon las odds ratios (OR) y los intervalos de confianza (IC) al 95%. Resultados: Durante el confinamiento, el 33,1% y el 24,1% puntuaron alto en las escalas de ansiedad y depresión respectivamente. Los factores independientes relacionados con la ansiedad (todos los valores OR; IC del 95%) durante el confinamiento fueron el sexo femenino (2; 1,2-5,4) y la actividad de la EII (4,3; 1,8-10,4). Los factores relacionados con la depresión fueron la comorbilidad (3,3; 1,1-9,8), la actividad de la EII (6; 1,9-18,1), el uso de biológicos (2,9; 1,1-7,6) y el vivir solo o con una persona (3,1; 1,2-8,2). Tras el confinamiento, los síntomas de ansiedad y depresión mostraron una mejoría significativa, ya que el 24,8% y el 15,2% tenían puntuaciones altas en ansiedad y depresión, respectivamente. Los factores relacionados con la ansiedad tras el confinamiento fueron el sexo femenino (2,5; 1,01-6,3), enfermedad de Crohn (3,3; 1,3-8,5) y EII activa (4,1; 1,2-13,7). Los factores asociados con la depresión fueron los antecedentes de trastornos del estado de ánimo y/o de ansiedad (6,3; 1,6-24,9), EII activa (7,5; 2,1-26,8), y el uso de esteroides (6,4; 1,4-29). Conclusiones: El confinamiento durante la pandemia de COVID-19 tuvo un impacto psicológico significativo en los pacientes con EII. La actividad de la enfermedad se relacionó con la presencia de síntomas de ansiedad y depresión durante y después del confinamiento.This work was supported by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI 18/01547) and the SVPD-Sociedad Valenciana de Patología Digestiva (Becas-2019)

Bibliotecas escolares

Resumen basado en el de la publicaciónMaterial práctico sobre el papel de la biblioteca escolar en la formación del alumnado. Analiza las estrategias para su uso como recurso en el apoyo de los procesos didácticos y ofrece información básica sobre técnicas documentales adaptadas a la biblioteca escolar.Ministerio Educación CIDEBiblioteca de Educación del Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte; Calle San Agustín 5 -3 Planta; 28014 Madrid; Tel. +34917748000; [email protected]

Recomendaciones para el trasplante renal de donante vivo

Esta guía de recomendaciones para el TR de donante vivo (TRDV) es un documento elaborado con el patrocinio de la Sociedad Española de Nefrología, la Sociedad Española de Trasplantes y la Organización Nacional de Trasplantes que actualiza la calidad de la evidencia disponible para ofrecer el mejor tratamiento de la insuficiencia renal crónica cuando se disponga de un donante vivo potencial. El objetivo principal de esta guía es proporcionar a los profesionales con responsabilidad en los estudios previos del donante vivo y del receptor trasplantado, las mejores herramientas para tomar decisiones en beneficio del donante vivo y del receptor del trasplante. Además, en el contexto actual del TR, el donante vivo debe recuperar el protagonismo que alcanzó en un pasado reciente. Para ello, las nuevas modalidades de donación HLA y/o ABO incompatible, así como la donación cruzada disponibles en diversos centros con experiencia en TRDV, son oportunidades adicionales para el tratamiento de enfermos renales que tienen un donante incompatible. Los buenos resultados en supervivencia del paciente y del injerto están ampliando las circunstancias de aceptación de donantes vivos de riñón, incluyendo donantes de mayor edad y otros con algunos condicionantes que incluyen antecedentes o alteraciones límite que, cuando son evaluados con criterios objetivos, pueden aportar un numero adicional de trasplantes. No se ha obviado en esta guía que el TRDV puede representar algún riesgo para el que dona. Estos problemas que pueden aparecer a corto o largo plazo tienen que ser objeto principal de valoración previa a la donación y presentados al potencial donante para que en ejercicio de su autonomía los asuma o rechace. La experiencia acumulada en los últimos años ha permitido avanzar en el análisis de riesgos para preservar la salud de los donantes, aspecto que debe estar siempre presente en los responsables de programas de TRDV cuando se procede al estudio de idoneidad de un potencial donante. Finalmente, esta guía ha sido estructurada para facilitar la toma de decisiones con recomendaciones y sugerencias ante incertidumbres derivadas de los resultados en los exhaustivos estudios predonación. Y todo ello, con el objetivo de que el consentimiento informado que debe certificar la calidad de los estudios y la información proporcionada a donante y receptor, alcancen las mayores garantías posibles

Recommendations for living donor kidney transplantation Recomendaciones para el trasplante renal de donante vivo

Altres ajuts: European Regional Development (Fund-ERDF).This Guide for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (LDKT) has been prepared with the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Transplant Society (SET), and the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). It updates evidence to offer the best chronic renal failure treatment when a potential living donor is available. The core aim of this Guide is to supply clinicians who evaluate living donors and transplant recipients with the best decision-making tools, to optimise their outcomes. Moreover, the role of living donors in the current KT context should recover the level of importance it had until recently. To this end the new forms of incompatible HLA and/or ABO donation, as well as the paired donation which is possible in several hospitals with experience in LDKT, offer additional ways to treat renal patients with an incompatible donor. Good results in terms of patient and graft survival have expanded the range of circumstances under which living renal donors are accepted. Older donors are now accepted, as are others with factors that affect the decision, such as a borderline clinical history or alterations, which when evaluated may lead to an additional number of transplantations. This Guide does not forget that LDKT may lead to risk for the donor. Pre-donation evaluation has to centre on the problems which may arise over the short or long-term, and these have to be described to the potential donor so that they are able take them into account. Experience over recent years has led to progress in risk analysis, to protect donors' health. This aspect always has to be taken into account by LDKT programmes when evaluating potential donors. Finally, this Guide has been designed to aid decision-making, with recommendations and suggestions when uncertainties arise in pre-donation studies. Its overarching aim is to ensure that informed consent is based on high quality studies and information supplied to donors and recipients, offering the strongest possible guarantees