Embedding Four-directional Paths on Convex Point Sets

A directed path whose edges are assigned labels "up", "down", "right", or "left" is called \emph{four-directional}, and \emph{three-directional} if at most three out of the four labels are used. A \emph{direction-consistent embedding} of an \mbox{$n$-vertex} four-directional path $P$ on a set $S$ of $n$ points in the plane is a straight-line drawing of $P$ where each vertex of $P$ is mapped to a distinct point of $S$ and every edge points to the direction specified by its label. We study planar direction-consistent embeddings of three- and four-directional paths and provide a complete picture of the problem for convex point sets.Comment: 11 pages, full conference version including all proof

Current use of androgens in bone marrow failure disorders: a report from the Severe Aplastic Anemia Working Party of the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Androgens have represented the historical therapeutic backbone of bone marrow failure (BMF) syndromes. However, their role has been rarely analyzed in prospective setting and systematic and long-term data are currently unavailable regarding their usage, effectiveness and toxicity in both acquired and inherited BMF. Here, taking advantage of a unique disease-specific international dataset, we retrospectively analyzed the so far largest cohort of BMF patients who received androgens before or in absence of an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), reappraising their current use in these disorders. We identified 274 patients across 82 EBMT affiliated centers, 193 with acquired (median age of 32) and 81 with inherited BMF (median age of 8 years). With a median duration of androgen treatment of 5.6 and 20 months respectively, complete/partial remission rates at 3 months were of 6%/29% in acquired and 8%/29% in inherited disorders. Five-year overall survival and failure free survival (FFS) were respectively 63% and 23% in acquired and 78% and 14% in inherited contexts. Androgen initiation after second line treatments for acquired, and after > 12 months post-diagnosis for inherited group were identified as factors associated with improved FFS in multivariable analysis. Androgen use was associated with a manageable incidence of organ-specific toxicity and low rates of solid and hematological malignancies. Sub-analysis of transplant-related outcomes after exposure to these compounds showed probabilities of survival and complications similar to other transplanted BMF cohorts. This study delivers a unique opportunity to track androgen use in BMF syndromes and represents the basis for general recommendations on their use on behalf of the SAAWP of the EBMT

Outcomes of CMML patients undergoing allo-HCT are significantly worse compared to MDS-a study of the CMWP of the EBMT

Although CMML since long has been separated from MDS, many studies continue to evaluate the outcomes of both diseases after hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) together. Data evaluating outcomes of a large CMML cohort after allo-HCT compared to MDS are limited. We aim to compare outcomes of CMML to MDS patients who underwent allo-HCT between 2010 and 2018. Patients ≥18 years with CMML and MDS undergoing allo-HCT reported to the EBMT registry were analyzed. Progression to AML before allo-HCT was an exclusion criterion. Overall survival (OS), progression/relapse-free survival (PFS), relapse incidence (including progression) (REL), and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were evaluated in univariable and multivariable (MVA) Cox proportional hazard models including interaction terms between disease and confounders. In total, 10832 patients who underwent allo-HCT were included in the study, there were a total of 1466 CMML, and 9366 MDS. The median age at time of allo-HCT in CMML (median 60.5, IQR 54.3–65.2 years) was significantly higher than in the MDS cohort (median 58.8, IQR 50.2–64.5 years; p < .001). A significantly higher percentage of CMML patients were male (69.4%) compared to MDS (61.2%; p < .001). There were no clinically meaningful differences in the distribution of Karnofsky score, Sorror HCT-CI score at allo-HCT, and donor type, between the CMML and MDS patients. RIC platforms were utilized in 63.9% of CMML allo-HCT, and in 61.4% of MDS patients (p = .08). In univariable analyses, we found that OS, PFS, and REL were significantly worse in CMML when compared with MDS (all p < .0001), whereas no significant difference was observed in NRM (p = .77). In multivariable analyses, the HR comparing MDS versus CMML for OS was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.74–0.88, p < .001), PFS 0.76 (95% CI 0.70–0.82, p < .001), relapse 0.66 (95% CI 0.59–0.74, p < .001), and NRM 0.87 (95% CI 0.78–0.98, p = .02), respectively. The association between baseline variables and outcome was found to be similar in MDS and CMML (all interaction p > .05) except for a decreasing trend over time of the risk of relapse in CMML (HR allo-HCT per year later 0.94, 95% CI 0.90–0.98), whereas no such trend was observed in MDS (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98–1.02). The poor outcome observed for CMML could be related to variables not measured in this study or to factors inherent to the disease itself. This study demonstrates that outcomes of CMML patients after allo-HCT are significantly worse compared to MDS. The results of this study may contribute to future recommendations for allo-HCT in CMML patients

Impact of Cytogenetic Risk on Outcomes of Non-T-Cell–Depleted Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Baseline cytogenetics and disease status are key factors predicting the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The importance of cytogenetic risk in patients with primary refractory or relapsed (R/R) AML undergoing haploidentical (Haplo) HCT is unknown. We studied the impact of cytogenetic risk in patients with R/R de novo AML with active disease who underwent non-T-cell–depleted Haplo-HCT with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide from 2010 to 2020. Four hundred forty patients with active disease at transplantation from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation database were analyzed (291 [66.1%] with intermediate-risk [AMLint] and 149 [44.1%] with adverse-risk cytogenetics [AMLadv]). Impact of baseline cytogenetic risk on various transplantation outcomes was evaluated. Pre-transplantation disease status was relapse in 48.1% and 26.8% and primary refractory in 51.9% and 73.2% of the patients with AMLint and AMLadv, respectively (P < .0001). Two-year leukemia-free survival (LFS, 35.5% versus 15.5%, P = .001) and overall survival (OS, 39.2% versus 20.1%, P = .001) were better in AMLint versus AMLadv. In multivariate analysis, the relapse rate was significantly higher (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.17 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.57-3.0]) and LFS (HR = 1.71 [95% CI, 1.31-2.22]) and OS (HR = 1.69 [95% CI, 1.29-2.22]), significantly lower for patients with AMLadv compared to AMLint, conditioning intensity did not affect leukemia relapse rate. Non-relapse mortality (HR = 1.1 [95% CI, 0.7-1.74]) and graft-versus-host disease–free, relapse-free survival (HR = 1.37 [95% CI, 1.06-1.77]) did not differ significantly between the risk groups. Disease status before transplant (primary refractory versus relapsed) or conditioning intensity did not impact main transplant outcomes. Baseline cytogenetic risk remains a key prognostic factor for patients with R/R AML with persistent disease before non-T-cell–depleted Haplo-HCT

Comparable outcomes of haploidentical transplant with TBF conditioning versus matched unrelated donor with fludarabine/busulfan conditioning for acute myeloid leukemia

We compared transplant outcomes of 708 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients receiving haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation using thiotepa/busulfan/fludarabine (TBF) conditioning with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (ptCy), to 2083 patients receiving matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplantation using fludarabine/busulfan (FB) conditioning and in vivo T-cell depletion. For intermediate cytogenetic risk AML transplanted in first complete remission (CR1), multivariate analysis revealed that haplo-TBF significantly increased nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (HR 2.1; p = 0.0006) but did not affect relapse incidence (RI), leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), or graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS). For high cytogenetic risk AML transplanted in CR1, haplo-TBF significantly increased NRM (HR = 2.7; p = 0.02), decreased RI (HR = 0.45; p = 0.03) but had no influence on LFS, OS, or GRFS. For AML transplanted in CR2, haplo-TBF significantly increased NRM (HR = 2.36; p = 0.008), decreased RI (HR = 0.38; p = 0.005), but had no influence on LFS, OS, or GRFS. Finally, for AML patients transplanted with active disease, haplo-TBF had no influence on transplant outcomes. In conclusion, compared to MUD-FB, haplo-TBF increased NRM, reduced RI in high-risk AML in CR, resulting in similar LFS, OS, and GRFS. These results comparing two different approaches support the use of a haploidentical family donor for high-risk AML patients lacking a matched sibling donor