57 research outputs found

    Measuring the Wilson depression of sunspots using the divergence-free condition of the magnetic field vector

    Full text link
    Context: The Wilson depression is the difference in geometric height of unit continuum optical depth between the sunspot umbra and the quiet Sun. Measuring the Wilson depression is important for understanding the geometry of sunspots. Current methods suffer from systematic effects or need to make assumptions on the geometry of the magnetic field. This leads to large systematic uncertainties of the derived Wilson depressions. Aims: We aim at developing a robust method for deriving the Wilson depression that only requires the information about the magnetic field that is accessible from spectropolarimetry, and that does not rely on assumptions on the geometry of sunspots or on their magnetic field. Methods: Our method is based on minimizing the divergence of the magnetic field vector derived from spectropolarimetric observations. We focus on large spatial scales only in order to reduce the number of free parameters. Results: We test the performance of our method using synthetic Hinode data derived from two sunspot simulations. We find that the maximum and the umbral averaged Wilson depression for both spots determined with our method typically lies within 100 km of the true value obtained from the simulations. In addition, we apply the method to Hinode observations of a sunspot. The derived Wilson depression (about 600 km) is consistent with results typically obtained from the Wilson effect. We also find that the Wilson depression obtained from using horizontal force balance gives 110 - 180 km smaller Wilson depressions than both, what we find and what we deduce directly from the simulations. This suggests that the magnetic pressure and the magnetic curvature force contribute to the Wilson depression by a similar amount.Comment: 12 pages, 8 figures. Accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysic

    No universal connection between the vertical magnetic field and the umbra-penumbra boundary in sunspots

    Full text link
    Context. It has been reported that the boundary between the umbra and the penumbra of sunspots occurs at a canonical value of the strength of the vertical magnetic field, independently of the size of the spot. This critical field strength is interpreted as to be the threshold for the onset of magnetoconvection. Aims. Here we investigate the reasons why this criterion, also called the Jur\v{c}\'ak criterion in the literature, does not always identify the boundary between umbra and penumbra. Methods. We perform a statistical analysis of 23 sunspots observed with Hinode/SOT. We compare the properties of the continuum intensity and the vertical magnetic field between filaments and spines and how they vary between spots of different sizes. Results. We find that the inner boundary of the penumbra is not related to a universal value of the vertical magnetic field. The properties of spines and filaments vary between spots of different sizes. Both components are darker in larger spots and the spines exhibit stronger vertical magnetic field. These variations of the properties of filaments and spines with spot size are also the reason for the reported invariance of the averaged vertical magnetic field at 50% of the mean continuum intensity. Conclusions. The formation of filaments and the onset of magnetoconvection are not related to a canonical value of the strength of the vertical magnetic field. Such a seemingly unique magnetic field strength is rather an effect of the filling factor of spines and penumbral filaments.Comment: 15 pages, 11 figures. Accepted for publication in Astronomy and Astrophysic

    The Solar Orbiter Science Activity Plan: translating solar and heliospheric physics questions into action

    Get PDF
    Solar Orbiter is the first space mission observing the solar plasma both in situ and remotely, from a close distance, in and out of the ecliptic. The ultimate goal is to understand how the Sun produces and controls the heliosphere, filling the Solar System and driving the planetary environments. With six remote-sensing and four in-situ instrument suites, the coordination and planning of the operations are essential to address the following four top-level science questions: (1) What drives the solar wind and where does the coronal magnetic field originate?; (2) How do solar transients drive heliospheric variability?; (3) How do solar eruptions produce energetic particle radiation that fills the heliosphere?; (4) How does the solar dynamo work and drive connections between the Sun and the heliosphere? Maximising the mission’s science return requires considering the characteristics of each orbit, including the relative position of the spacecraft to Earth (affecting downlink rates), trajectory events (such as gravitational assist manoeuvres), and the phase of the solar activity cycle. Furthermore, since each orbit’s science telemetry will be downloaded over the course of the following orbit, science operations must be planned at mission level, rather than at the level of individual orbits. It is important to explore the way in which those science questions are translated into an actual plan of observations that fits into the mission, thus ensuring that no opportunities are missed. First, the overarching goals are broken down into specific, answerable questions along with the required observations and the so-called Science Activity Plan (SAP) is developed to achieve this. The SAP groups objectives that require similar observations into Solar Orbiter Observing Plans, resulting in a strategic, top-level view of the optimal opportunities for science observations during the mission lifetime. This allows for all four mission goals to be addressed. In this paper, we introduce Solar Orbiter’s SAP through a series of examples and the strategy being followed

    Helioseismology with the Solar Orbiter mission

    No full text

    Helioseismology with Solar Orbiter

    No full text

    Exploring the latitude and depth dependence of solar Rossby waves using ring-diagram analysis

    No full text
    Context. Global-scale equatorial Rossby waves have recently been unambiguously identified on the Sun. Like solar acoustic modes, Rossby waves are probes of the solar interior. Aims. We study the latitude and depth dependence of the Rossby wave eigenfunctions. Methods. By applying helioseismic ring-diagram analysis and granulation tracking to observations by HMI aboard SDO, we computed maps of the radial vorticity of flows in the upper solar convection zone (down to depths of more than 16 Mm). The horizontal sampling of the ring-diagram maps is approximately 90 Mm (∌7.5°) and the temporal sampling is roughly 27 hr. We used a Fourier transform in longitude to separate the different azimuthal orders m in the range 3 ≀ m ≀ 15. At each m we obtained the phase and amplitude of the Rossby waves as functions of depth using the helioseismic data. At each m we also measured the latitude dependence of the eigenfunctions by calculating the covariance between the equator and other latitudes. Results. We conducted a study of the horizontal and radial dependences of the radial vorticity eigenfunctions. The horizontal eigenfunctions are complex. As observed previously, the real part peaks at the equator and switches sign near ±30°, thus the eigenfunctions show significant non-sectoral contributions. The imaginary part is smaller than the real part. The phase of the radial eigenfunctions varies by only ±5° over the top 15 Mm. The amplitude of the radial eigenfunctions decreases by about 10% from the surface down to 8 Mm (the region in which ring-diagram analysis is most reliable, as seen by comparing with the rotation rate measured by global-mode seismology). Conclusions. The radial dependence of the radial vorticity eigenfunctions deduced from ring-diagram analysis is consistent with a power law down to 8 Mm and is unreliable at larger depths. However, the observations provide only weak constraints on the power-law exponents. For the real part, the latitude dependence of the eigenfunctions is consistent with previous work (using granulation tracking). The imaginary part is smaller than the real part but significantly nonzero

    Connecting the Wilson depression to the magnetic field of sunspots

    No full text
    Context. In sunspots, the geometric height of continuum optical depth unity is depressed compared to the quiet Sun. This so-called Wilson depression is caused by the Lorentz force of the strong magnetic field inside the spots. However, it is not understood in detail yet how the Wilson depression is related to the strength and geometry of the magnetic field or to other properties of the sunspot. Aims. We aim to study the dependence of the Wilson depression on the properties of the magnetic field of the sunspots and how exactly the magnetic field contributes to balancing the Wilson depression with respect to the gas pressure of the surroundings of the spots. Methods. Our study is based on 24 spectropolarimetric scans of 12 individual sunspots performed with Hinode. We derived the Wilson depression for each spot using both a recently developed method that is based on minimizing the divergence of the magnetic field and an approach that was developed earlier, which enforces an equilibrium between the gas pressure and the magnetic pressure inside the spot and the gas pressure in the quiet Sun, thus neglecting the influence of the curvature force. We then performed a statistical analysis by comparing the Wilson depression resulting from the two techniques with each other and by relating them to various parameters of the sunspots, such as their size or the strength of the magnetic field. Results. We find that the Wilson depression becomes larger for spots with a stronger magnetic field, but not as much as one would expect from the increased magnetic pressure. This suggests that the curvature integral provides an important contribution to the Wilson depression, particularly for spots with a weak magnetic field. Our results indicate that the geometry of the magnetic field in the penumbra is different between spots with different strengths of the average umbral magnetic field
    • 

    corecore