16 research outputs found
Is the self-reported private health insurance status in the National Health Survey representative of private health insurance coverage in Australia?
Objective: This study determines whether the distribution of self-reported private health insurance (PHI) status in the 2004/05 National Health Survey (NHS) is representative of PHI coverage in Australia. Methods: Weighted estimates from the NHS 2004/05 are compared with PHI status reported for 2004/05 by the Private Health Insurance Administration Council (PHIAC, the independent regulator of the private health insurance industry). PHI status was imputed to children in the NHS based on PHI status of the adult in the household. The two data sources were deemed to be different if the PHIAC results were not within the 95% CI range for the NHS estimate. Results: PHI status reported in the NHS and PHIAC are generally comparable except for some categories such as hospital cover of males aged 5-9 years and females aged 85 years and older where the NHS estimates are below PHIAC numbers; and males aged 25-29, 35-39, and 50-54 years where the NHS estimates are higher. Conclusions: The findings suggest that while the NHS 2004/05 estimates may accurately represent coverage in Australia particularly when examined at an aggregated level, there is some variation in the NHS estimates when examined by sex and age group. Implications: Researchers need to be aware of the potential for sampling and reporting bias to contribute to some misrepresentation of PHI status when using the NHS to generalise to the Australian population. Exploring corrective measures will ensure that the NHS continues to be a valuable data resource for health researchers in Australia
Sharing personal information in the child protection context: Impediments in the Australian legal framework
The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the right to health: is Australia meeting its obligations to Aboriginal peoples?
Australia's children 'safe and well'? Collaborating with purpose across Commonwealth family relationship and state child protection systems
So ubiquitous is reference to collaboration in policy documents that it is in danger of being ignored altogether by service deliverers who are not clear about its rationale, how it is built, or its real value. This is evident in the child and family services context where for example the National Framework for Protecting Australia's Children calls for collaboration and a âshared responsibilityâ across the state, Commonwealth and the non-government sectors to keep children safe and well. This article describes a project undertaken to analyse and ultimately increase levels of collaboration between state and Commonwealth government family service providers. The research reinforced an important message that levels of collaboration should align with the vulnerability of children and their families: the greater the level of risks to children, the greater the level of collaboration needed within and between systems to keep children safe