Quality of Life and Autonomy in Patients with Intermittent Bladder Catheterization Trained by Specialized Nurses

Intermittent bladder catheterization (IBC) involves regular urine draining using a catheter, which is removed immediately after urinary elimination. It allows for the patient's urological health to be managed and their renal function to be preserved, and it promotes autonomy. Compliance with the prescribed number of daily catheterizations, which must be conducted by the patient, and infection prevention measures are crucial. To identify the patients requiring IBC, and to determine their adherence (whether they followed the prescribed guidelines and their difficulty in carrying out the procedure, as well as to assess how the IBC influences their quality of life and state of mind after receiving self-care training from a specialized nurse), we carried out a prospective, multicenter observational study in 24 Spanish hospitals with one month of monitoring and a sample of 99 patients. The sources of information were the patients' clinical records, the King's Health Questionnaire, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Descriptive and bivariate statistics were used to analyses the paired data. After recruitment (n = 99), 79 patients completed the questionnaire at a mean age of 35.2 years (SD = 20.5 years). In total, 53.5% (53) of the sample consisted of men and 32.3% (32) had neurological damage as the reason for prescription; 67% (67.7) performed self-catheterization and 86.7% adhered to the IBC. After one month of monitoring, a statistically significant improvement in quality of life was observed in all criteria, with the exception of personal relationships (p < 0.005), as well as an improvement in anxiety and depression levels (p < 0.001). Patients who require IBC show good adherence to the IBC with a significant percentage of self-catheterization. After one month of IBC, a significant improvement in the patients' quality of life and mood was observed. These results could be attributed to adequate patient training and adequate personalization of the IBC materials by the specialized nurses

Evolution of Quality of Life and Treatment Adherence after One Year of Intermittent Bladder Catheterisation in Functional Urology Unit Patients

Objective: To determine patient difficulties and concerns when performing IBC (Intermittent Bladder Catheterisation), as well as the evolution of adherence, quality of life, and emotional state of patients one year after starting IBC. Method: A prospective, observational, multicentre study conducted in 20 Spanish hospitals with a one-year follow-up. Data sources were patient records and the King's Health Questionnaire on quality of life, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Perceived adherence was measured using the ICAS (Intermittent Catheterization Adherence Scale) and perceived difficulties with IBC were assessed using the ICDQ (Intermittent Catheterization Difficulty Questionnaire). For data analysis, descriptive and bivariate statistics were performed for paired data at three points in time (T1: one month, T2: three months, T3: one year). Results: A total of 134 subjects initially participated in the study (T0), becoming 104 subjects at T1, 91 at T2, and 88 at T3, with a mean age of 39 years (standard deviation = 22.16 years). Actual IBC adherence ranged from 84.8% at T1 to 84.1% at T3. After one year of follow-up, a statistically significant improvement in quality of life (p <= 0.05) was observed in all dimensions with the exception of personal relationships. However, there were no changes in the levels of anxiety (p = 0.190) or depression (p = 0.682) at T3 compared to T0. Conclusions: Patients requiring IBC exhibit good treatment adherence, with a significant proportion of them performing self-catheterisation. After one year of IBC, a significant improvement in quality of life was noted, albeit with a significant impact on their daily lives and their personal and social relationships. Patient support programmes could be implemented to improve their ability to cope with difficulties and thus enhance both their quality of life and the maintenance of their adherence

To return or to discard? Randomised trial on gastric residual volume management

Background: The control of gastric residual volume (GRV) is a common nursing intervention in intensive care; however the literature shows a wide variation in clinical practice regarding the management of GRV, potentially affecting patients" clinical outcomes. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of returning or discarding GRV, on gastric emptying delays and feeding, electrolyte and comfort outcomes in critically ill patients. Method: A randomised, prospective, clinical trial design was used to study 125 critically ill patients, assigned to the return or the discard group. Main outcome measure was delayed gastric emptying. Feeding outcomes were determined measuring intolerance indicators, feeding delays and feeding potential complications. Fluid and electrolyte measures included serum potassium, glycaemia control and fluid balance. Discomfort was identified by significant changes in vital signs. Results: Patients in both groups presented similar mean GRV with no significant differences found (p=0.111), but participants in the intervention arm showed a lower incidence and severity of delayed gastric emptying episodes (p=0.001). No significant differences were found for the rest of outcome measurements, except for hyperglycaemia. Conclusions: The results of this study support the recommendation to reintroduce gastric content aspirated to improve GRV management without increasing the risk for potential complications

Determinación del volumen gástrico residual: en busca de la mejor evidencia

Introducción: La determinación del volumen gástrico residual es una práctica frecuente en pacientes críticos, pero hay falta de consenso acerca de la conveniencia de reintroducir o desechar el contenido gástrico aspirado (CGA). Objetivo: Determinar el grado de evidencia científica acerca de la eficacia de 2 intervenciones-reintroducción/rechazo- del CGA en pacientes críticos. Material y métodos: Revisión sistemática de la evidencia disponible acerca de la conveniencia de reintroducir o desechar el CGA. Proceso: a) establecimiento de los criterios de inclusión/exclusión; b) determinación de la estrategia de búsqueda (palabras clave e itinerarios); c) vaciado de las bases de datos: MEDLINE, CINAHL, CUIDEN, IME, SCIELO y COCHRANE. Búsqueda por método indirecto y vaciado manual de índices; d) lectura crítica independiente y contrastada, utilizando la plantilla CASPe, y e) contraste de resultados del análisis crítico. Resultados: Los itinerarios de búsqueda generan más de 800 referencias que, una vez depuradas, permiten seleccionar 54. Después de su lectura, sólo 4 se centran realmente en cuestiones relacionadas con la reintroducción/rechazo del CGA: 2 revisiones, un estudio observacional y un ECA de muestra pequeña. La heterogeneidad de estos estudios no permite emplear técnicas de metaanálisis. Por ello se analizan por separado los resultados de cada estudio. Mediante este proceso se obtiene un resultado final que demuestra un bajo grado de evidencia científica. Conclusiones: Hay escasa evidencia científica acerca de la conveniencia, la seguridad y los beneficios de ambas intervenciones. Es difícil establecer un protocolo de cuidados, por lo que se planteó realizar un estudio experimental para establecer las indicaciones y contraindicaciones de ambas intervenciones

To return or to discard? Randomised trial on gastric residual volume management

Background: The control of gastric residual volume (GRV) is a common nursing intervention in intensive care; however the literature shows a wide variation in clinical practice regarding the management of GRV, potentially affecting patients" clinical outcomes. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of returning or discarding GRV, on gastric emptying delays and feeding, electrolyte and comfort outcomes in critically ill patients. Method: A randomised, prospective, clinical trial design was used to study 125 critically ill patients, assigned to the return or the discard group. Main outcome measure was delayed gastric emptying. Feeding outcomes were determined measuring intolerance indicators, feeding delays and feeding potential complications. Fluid and electrolyte measures included serum potassium, glycaemia control and fluid balance. Discomfort was identified by significant changes in vital signs. Results: Patients in both groups presented similar mean GRV with no significant differences found (p=0.111), but participants in the intervention arm showed a lower incidence and severity of delayed gastric emptying episodes (p=0.001). No significant differences were found for the rest of outcome measurements, except for hyperglycaemia. Conclusions: The results of this study support the recommendation to reintroduce gastric content aspirated to improve GRV management without increasing the risk for potential complications

Determinación del volumen gástrico residual: en busca de la mejor evidencia

Introducción: La determinación del volumen gástrico residual es una práctica frecuente en pacientes críticos, pero hay falta de consenso acerca de la conveniencia de reintroducir o desechar el contenido gástrico aspirado (CGA). Objetivo: Determinar el grado de evidencia científica acerca de la eficacia de 2 intervenciones-reintroducción/rechazo- del CGA en pacientes críticos. Material y métodos: Revisión sistemática de la evidencia disponible acerca de la conveniencia de reintroducir o desechar el CGA. Proceso: a) establecimiento de los criterios de inclusión/exclusión; b) determinación de la estrategia de búsqueda (palabras clave e itinerarios); c) vaciado de las bases de datos: MEDLINE, CINAHL, CUIDEN, IME, SCIELO y COCHRANE. Búsqueda por método indirecto y vaciado manual de índices; d) lectura crítica independiente y contrastada, utilizando la plantilla CASPe, y e) contraste de resultados del análisis crítico. Resultados: Los itinerarios de búsqueda generan más de 800 referencias que, una vez depuradas, permiten seleccionar 54. Después de su lectura, sólo 4 se centran realmente en cuestiones relacionadas con la reintroducción/rechazo del CGA: 2 revisiones, un estudio observacional y un ECA de muestra pequeña. La heterogeneidad de estos estudios no permite emplear técnicas de metaanálisis. Por ello se analizan por separado los resultados de cada estudio. Mediante este proceso se obtiene un resultado final que demuestra un bajo grado de evidencia científica. Conclusiones: Hay escasa evidencia científica acerca de la conveniencia, la seguridad y los beneficios de ambas intervenciones. Es difícil establecer un protocolo de cuidados, por lo que se planteó realizar un estudio experimental para establecer las indicaciones y contraindicaciones de ambas intervenciones