Short-Term cost impact of compliance with clinical practice guidelines for initial sarcoma treatment

Background: The impact of compliance to clinical practice guidelines (CPG) on outcomes and/or costs of care has not been completely clarified.Objective: To estimate relationships between medical expenditures and compliance to CPG for initial sarcoma treatment.Research design: Selected cohorts of patients diagnosed with sarcoma in 2005 and 2006, and treated at the University hospital and/or the cancer centre of the Rhône-Alpes region, France (n=90). Main outcome measurements were: patient characteristics, compliance with CPG, health outcomes, and costs. Data were mainly extracted from patient records. The logarithm of treatment costs was modelled using linear and Tobit regressions.Results: Rates of compliance with CPG were 86%, 66%, 88%, 89%, and 95% for initial diagnosis, primary surgical excision, wide surgical excision, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, respectively. Total average costs reached €24,439, with €1,784, €11,225, €10,360, and €1,016 for diagnosis, surgery (primary and wide surgical excisions), chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, respectively. Compliance of diagnosis with CPG decreased the cost of diagnosis, whereas compliance of primary surgical excision increased the cost of chemotherapy. Compliance of chemotherapy with CPG decreased the cost of radiotherapy.Conclusion: Since chemotherapy is one of the major cost drivers, these results support that compliance with guidelines increases medical care expenditures in short term.Oncology; Sarcoma; Cost; Clinical guidelines; Efficacy; Medical Practices; Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

Incidence of Sarcoma Histotypes and Molecular Subtypes in a Prospective Epidemiological Study with Central Pathology Review and Molecular Testing

International audienceBACKGROUND: The exact overall incidence of sarcoma and sarcoma subtypes is not known. The objective of the present population-based study was to determine this incidence in a European region (Rhone-Alpes) of six million inhabitants, based on a central pathological review of the cases. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: From March 2005 to February 2007, pathology reports and tumor blocks were prospectively collected from the 158 pathologists of the Rhone-Alpes region. All diagnosed or suspected cases of sarcoma were collected, reviewed centrally, examined for molecular alterations and classified according to the 2002 World Health Organization classification. Of the 1287 patients screened during the study period, 748 met the criteria for inclusion in the study. The overall crude and world age-standardized incidence rates were respectively 6.2 and 4.8 per 100,000/year. Incidence rates for soft tissue, visceral and bone sarcomas were respectively 3.6, 2.0 and 0.6 per 100,000. The most frequent histological subtypes were gastrointestinal stromal tumor (18%; 1.1/100,000), unclassified sarcoma (16%; 1/100,000), liposarcoma (15%; 0.9/100,000) and leiomyosarcoma (11%; 0.7/100,000). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The observed incidence of sarcomas was higher than expected. This study is the first detailed investigation of the crude incidence of histological and molecular subtypes of sarcomas

Medical practices and guidelines in oncology, different assessment methods : example of breast and colon cancers and sarcomas

La base de la pratique médicale est l’observation : observation clinique du patient, observation épidémiologique d’une population, etc… L’analyse des pratiques observe la pluralité des attitudes adoptées par les praticiens face à une situation clinique. A un fait scientifique reconnu correspond une multitude d’attitudes pratiques. L’analyse de ces pratiques décrit la répartition et les variations de ces pratiques, et tente d’en expliquer les raisons. En France, la pratique clinique quotidienne reste encore un secteur peu étudié. Si les variations ne s’expliquent pas par les caractéristiques des patients, les raisons des variations sont peut-être à rechercher du côté médical. L’un des domaines étudié, où il peut y avoir également des variations de pratiques médicales est la cancérologie. Dans ce domaine les raisons de variations des pratiques peuvent être nombreuses et liées aux médecins, à leur structure ou à la politique d’hospitalisation de la région. Le postulat de départ est que l’harmonisation des prises en charge et des traitements des patients peut influencer leur survie. C’est pourquoi ce travail c’est intéressé à comparer la prise en charge des patients atteints de cancers fréquents (cancer du sein et du colon) à un cancer rare (les sarcomes) dans la région Rhône-Alpes. Nous avons montré, à travers des études prospectives et rétrospectives, le rôle du thesaurus et de son implémentation dans les pratiques médicales et leurs modifications. Nous avons également développé un outil informatique sous forme d’algorithmes décisionnels permettant de montrer le cas échéant si certaines étapes de l’audit clinique pouvaient être automatisées. La comparaison entre l’évaluation des pratiques médicales par un évaluateur et les algorithmes nous ont permis de conclure sur l’importance de la reproductibilité des décisions et sur les apports, de l’informatisation de ces procédés. Nous avons également montré l’importance d’une relecture des blocs de tumeurs par un expert dans une pathologie cancéreuse rare et complexe. Cela nous a permis de spécifier la nouvelle incidence des sarcomes en région Rhône-AlpesObservation is the basis of medical practice: clinical observation of the patient, epidemiological observation of a population, and so on… the analysis of practices observes the plurality of attitudes physicians take when they face a clinical situation. An acknowledged scientific fact given meets dozen of practical attitudes. The analysis of these practices describes their distribution and variations and try to explain the causes. In France, the daily clinical practice is still a sector on which few studied have been realized. If patients' characteristics can't explain variations, the causes of these variations may be found on the medical side. Medical practice variations can also be found in oncology, one of the studied domains. Causes of variations of practices in this domain can be numerous and linked to physicians, to their structures or to the region hospital care .policy. The postulate is that the harmonization of management and treatment of patients can act up on their survival. That is the reason why this work get interested in comparing the management of patients with frequent cancers (breast and colon) to rare cancers (sarcomas) in the Rhône-Alpes region. We showed, through prospective and retrospective studies, the role of a thesaurus and of its implementation in medical practices and their modifications. We have also developed a computing tool in decision-making algorithm form which could show if need be if some steps of clinical audit could be automated. The comparison between the assessment of medical practice made by an assessor or made thanks to the algorithms allowed us to conclude on the importance of reproducibility of decisions and on the contribution of the computerization of these processes. We also showed the necessity for tumours samples to be reviewed by an expert in a rare and difficult cancerous pathology. We could therefore specify the new incidence of sarcomas in the Rhône-Alpes regio

Multidisciplinarity and medical decision, impact for patients with cancer: sociological assessment of two tumour committees organization

The present study reports more than 30% of changes concerning strategy for patient with cancer due to multidisciplinary discussions. This indicates that, providing tumour committees are adapted to the pathologies' characteristics, they can promote a collective and multidisciplinary approach to oncology

Epidemiological evaluation of concordance between initial diagnosis and central pathology review in a comprehensive and prospective series of sarcoma patients in the Rhone-Alpes region.

International audienceBACKGROUND: Sarcomas are rare malignant tumors. Accurate initial histological diagnosis is essential for adequate management. We prospectively assessed the medical management of all patients diagnosed with sarcoma in a European region over a one-year period to identify the quantity of first diagnosis compared to central expert review (CER). METHODS: Histological data of all patients diagnosed with sarcoma in Rhone-Alpes between March 2005 and Feb 2006 were collected. Primary diagnoses were systematically compared with second opinion from regional and national experts. RESULTS: Of 448 patients included, 366 (82%) matched the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Of these, 199 (54%) had full concordance between primary diagnosis and second opinion (the first pathologist and the expert reached identical conclusions), 97 (27%) had partial concordance (identical diagnosis of conjonctive tumor but different grade or subtype), and 70 (19%) had complete discordance (different histological type or invalidation of the diagnosis of sarcoma). The major discrepancies were related to histological grade (n = 68, 19%), histological type (n = 39, 11%), subtype (n = 17, 5%), and grade plus subtype or grade plus histological type (n = 43, 12%). CONCLUSIONS: Over 45% of first histological diagnoses were modified at second reading, possibly resulting in different treatment decisions. Systematic second expert opinion improves the quality of diagnosis and possibly the management of patients

Multidisciplinarity and medical decision, impact for patients with cancer: sociological assessment of two tumour committees' organization.

International audiencePURPOSE: Medical practices in oncology are expected to be multidisciplinary, yet few articles studied how this may be concretely applied. In the present study, we evaluated the organization of two multidisciplinary committees, one for breast cancer and one for sarcoma, in a French Comprehensive Cancer Centre. METHODS: Both tumours were specifically chosen so as to emphasise substantial differences in relation with incidence, histological subtypes, management strategy, and scientific evidence. Between 2003 and 2004, 404 decision processes were observed, 210 for sarcoma (26 meetings) and 194 for breast cancer (10 meetings). The number of physicians who took part in the discussions and their medical specialties were systematically noted as well as the number of contradictory discussions, medical specialties represented in these contradictory discussions and the topics of contradiction. The last measured data was whether the final committee's decision was in conformity with the referent preferences or not. All these measures were related to the referent's medical speciality and working place, to the stage of the disease and to the disease management stage. RESULTS: Committees' specificities concerned their organization, referent's medical specialties, the number of participants in discussions and their medical specialties. Discussions in the sarcoma committee tended to be more multidisciplinary, involving more specialties. Initial strategy proposal for one patient was modified during the discussions for 86 patients out of 210 (41%) and for 62 out of 194 (32%) respectively for sarcoma and breast cancer. However, there was no significant difference in the rate of contradictory discussions between breast cancer and sarcoma committees (32% versus 41% respectively; P = 0.08). The rates of contradictory discussions were similar for localized cancers, local relapse and metastasis disease (37%, 41% and 34% respectively; P = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: The present study reports more than 30% of changes concerning strategy for patient with cancer due to multidisciplinary discussions. This indicates that, providing tumour committees are adapted to the pathologies' characteristics, they can promote a collective and multidisciplinary approach to oncology

Short-Term cost impact of compliance with clinical practice guidelines for initial sarcoma treatment

Working paper GATE 08-22Background: The impact of compliance to clinical practice guidelines (CPG) on outcomes and/or costs of care has not been completely clarified.Objective: To estimate relationships between medical expenditures and compliance to CPG for initial sarcoma treatment.Research design: Selected cohorts of patients diagnosed with sarcoma in 2005 and 2006, and treated at the University hospital and/or the cancer centre of the Rhône-Alpes region, France (n=90). Main outcome measurements were: patient characteristics, compliance with CPG, health outcomes, and costs. Data were mainly extracted from patient records. The logarithm of treatment costs was modelled using linear and Tobit regressions.Results: Rates of compliance with CPG were 86%, 66%, 88%, 89%, and 95% for initial diagnosis, primary surgical excision, wide surgical excision, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, respectively. Total average costs reached €24,439, with €1,784, €11,225, €10,360, and €1,016 for diagnosis, surgery (primary and wide surgical excisions), chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, respectively. Compliance of diagnosis with CPG decreased the cost of diagnosis, whereas compliance of primary surgical excision increased the cost of chemotherapy. Compliance of chemotherapy with CPG decreased the cost of radiotherapy.Conclusion: Since chemotherapy is one of the major cost drivers, these results support that compliance with guidelines increases medical care expenditures in short term