Unseen features of society create hidden health complications : An exemplification of how socio-cultural environments may impact pregnant women’s health. A case-study from Aira Woreda, Ethiopia

Master's thesis in global studies. VID Specialized University, Stavanger, May 2018Our understanding of our reality is shaped by our worldviews and the influences from a more intertwined world trough globalization. These forces influence each other as they simultaneously are important invisible dynamics that affect our everyday decisions, priorities and actions. I call these dynamics socio-cultural environments. The goal of this study is to provide a deeper understanding of how social-cultural environments may have an impact on pregnant women’s health in Aira Woreda, Ethiopia. A qualitative study consisting of a sixweek fieldwork including observations, interviews of 15 pregnant woman, health personal, governmental offices and regular people was conducted in Aira to gather primary data. Infrastructures such as roads, ambulances and communication technologies are more established today than before. Hospitals, clinics, health centres and health posts, supplied with medical health personnel, are present. Education is given at schools and health facilities. There have been both governmental and non-governmental, and international and national developmental work related to health campaigns, health promotion and/or health education regarding maternal health. However, many initiatives have not been successfully implemented. This is, partly, due to that the prominent aspects of socio-cultural environments many times have been overlooked. This thesis gives examples on how socio-cultural environments and its cognitive, affective and evaluative dimensions may affect pregnant women’s health seeking behaviours in Aira Woreda. A major conclusion of this study is that gender roles, religion and education have proven to be fundamental aspects in understanding how socio-cultural environments leads decisions and actions of pregnant women in Aira Woreda.submittedVersionMV 17 S

Active conventional treatment and three different biological treatments in early rheumatoid arthritis : phase IV investigator initiated, randomised, observer blinded clinical trial

OBJECTIVE To evaluate and compare benefits and harms of three biological treatments with different modes of action versus active conventional treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN Investigator initiated, randomised, open label, blinded assessor, multiarm, phase IV study. SETTING Twenty nine rheumatology departments in Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, and Iceland between 2012 and 2018. PARTICIPANTS Patients aged 18 years and older with treatment naive rheumatoid arthritis, symptom duration less than 24 months, moderate to severe disease activity, and rheumatoid factor or anti-citrullinated protein antibody positivity, or increased C reactive protein. INTERVENTIONS Randomised 1:1:1:1, stratified by country, sex, and anti-citrullinated protein antibody status. All participants started methotrexate combined with (a) active conventional treatment (either prednisolone tapered to 5 mg/day, or sulfasalazine combined with hydroxychloroquine and intraarticular corticosteroids), (b) certolizumab pegol, (c) abatacept, or (d) tocilizumab. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was adjusted clinical disease activity index remission (CDAI RESULTS 812 patients underwent randomisation. The mean age was 54.3 years (standard deviation 14.7) and 68.8% were women. Baseline disease activity score of 28 joints was 5.0 (standard deviation 1.1). Adjusted 24 week CDAI remission rates were 42.7% (95% confidence interval 36.1% to 49.3%) for active conventional treatment, 46.5% (39.9% to 53.1%) for certolizumab pegol, 52.0% (45.5% to 58.6%) for abatacept, and 42.1% (35.3% to 48.8%) for tocilizumab. Corresponding absolute differences were 3.9% (95% confidence interval -5.5% to 13.2%) for certolizumab pegol, 9.4% (0.1% to 18.7%) for abatacept, and -0.6% (-10.1% to 8.9%) for tocilizumab. Key secondary outcomes showed no major differences among the four treatments. Differences in CDAI remission rates for active conventional treatment versus certolizumab pegol and tocilizumab, but not abatacept, remained within the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 15% (per protocol population). The total number of serious adverse events was 13 (percentage of patients who experienced at least one event 5.6%) for active conventional treatment, 20 (8.4%) for certolizumab pegol, 10 (4.9%) for abatacept, and 10 (4.9%) for tocilizumab. Eleven patients treated with abatacept stopped treatment early compared with 20-23 patients in the other arms. CONCLUSIONS All four treatments achieved high remission rates. Higher CDAI remission rate was observed for abatacept versus active conventional treatment, but not for certolizumab pegol or tocilizumab versus active conventional treatment. Other remission rates were similar across treatments. Non-inferiority analysis indicated that active conventional treatment was non-inferior to certolizumab pegol and tocilizumab, but not to abatacept. The results highlight the efficacy and safety of active conventional treatment based on methotrexate combined with corticosteroids, with nominally better results for abatacept, in treatment naive early rheumatoid arthritis.Peer reviewe

Head-to-head comparison of aggressive conventional therapy and three biological treatments and comparison of two de-escalation strategies in patients who respond to treatment : study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded-assessor, phase 4 study

Background: New targeted therapies and improved treatment strategies have dramatically improved the outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, it is unknown whether different early aggressive interventions can induce stable remission or a low-active disease state that can be maintained with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) therapy, and whether they differ in efficacy and safety. The Nordic Rheumatic Diseases Strategy Trials And Registries (NORD-STAR) study will assess and compare (1) the proportion of patients who achieve remission in a head-to-head comparison between csDMARD plus glucocorticoid therapy and three different biological DMARD (bDMARD) therapies with different modes of action and (2) two de-escalation strategies in patients who respond to first-line therapy. Methods/design: In a pragmatic, 80-160-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, assessor-blinded, phase 4 study, 800 patients with early RA (symptom duration less than 24 months) are randomized 1: 1: 1: 1 to one of four different treatment arms: (1) aggressive csDMARD therapy with methotrexate + sulphasalazine + hydroxychloroquine + i. a. glucocorticoids (arm 1A) or methotrexate + prednisolone p.o. (arm 1B), (2) methotrexate + certolizumab-pegol, (3) methotrexate + abatacept, or (4) methotrexate + tocilizumab. The primary clinical endpoint is the proportion of patients reaching Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission at week 24. Patients in stable remission over 24 consecutive weeks enter part 2 of the study earliest after 48 weeks. Patients not achieving sustained CDAI remission over 24 consecutive weeks, exit the study after 80 weeks. In part 2, patients are re-randomized to two different de-escalation strategies, either immediate or delayed (after 24 weeks) tapering, followed by cessation of study medication. All patients remain on stable doses of methotrexate. The primary clinical endpoint in part 2 is the proportion of patients in remission (CDAI Discussion: NORD-STAR is the first investigator-initiated, randomized, early RA trial to compare (1) csDMARD and three different bDMARD therapies head to head and (2) two different de-escalation strategies. The trial has the potential to identify which treatment strategy to apply in early RA to achieve the best possible outcomes for both patients and society.Peer reviewe

Reflections upon separability and distillability

We present an abstract formulation of the so-called Innsbruck-Hannover programme that investigates quantum correlations and entanglement in terms of convex sets. We present a unified description of optimal decompositions of quantum states and the optimization of witness operators that detect whether a given state belongs to a given convex set. We illustrate the abstract formulation with several examples, and discuss relations between optimal entanglement witnesses and n-copy non-distillable states with non-positive partial transpose.Comment: 12 pages, 7 figures, proceedings of the ESF QIT Conference Gdansk, July 2001, submitted to special issue of J. Mod. Op

Low-density granulocytes are related to shorter pregnancy duration but not to interferon alpha protein blood levels in systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND: An increased risk of pregnancy complications is seen in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but the specific immunopathological drivers are still unclear. Hallmarks of SLE are granulocyte activation, type I interferon (IFN) overproduction, and autoantibodies. Here we examined whether low-density granulocytes (LDG) and granulocyte activation increase during pregnancy, and related the results to IFNα protein levels, autoantibody profile, and gestational age at birth. METHODS: Repeated blood samples were collected during pregnancy in trimesters one, two, and three from 69 women with SLE and 27 healthy pregnant women (HC). Nineteen of the SLE women were also sampled late postpartum. LDG proportions and granulocyte activation (CD62L shedding) were measured by flow cytometry. Plasma IFNα protein concentrations were quantified by single molecule array (Simoa) immune assay. Clinical data were obtained from medical records. RESULTS: Women with SLE had higher LDG proportions and increased IFNα protein levels compared to HC throughout pregnancy, but neither LDG fractions nor IFNα levels differed during pregnancy compared to postpartum in SLE. Granulocyte activation status was higher in SLE relative to HC pregnancies, and it was increased during pregnancy compared to after pregnancy in SLE. Higher LDG proportions in SLE were associated with antiphospholipid positivity but not to IFNα protein levels. Finally, higher LDG proportions in trimester three correlated independently with lower gestational age at birth in SLE. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that SLE pregnancy results in increased peripheral granulocyte priming, and that higher LDG proportions late in pregnancy are related to shorter pregnancy duration but not to IFNα blood levels in SLE

Phenol-Soluble Modulin α Peptide Toxins from Aggressive Staphylococcus aureus Induce Rapid Formation of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps through a Reactive Oxygen Species-Independent Pathway

Neutrophils have the ability to capture and kill microbes extracellularly through the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). These are DNA and protein structures that neutrophils release extracellularly and are believed to function as a defense mechanism against microbes. The classic NET formation process, triggered by, e.g., bacteria, fungi, or by direct stimulation of protein kinase C through phorbol myristate acetate, is an active process that takes several hours and relies on the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are further modified by myeloperoxidase (MPO). We show here that NET-like structures can also be formed by neutrophils after interaction with phenol-soluble modulin α (PSMα) that are cytotoxic membrane-disturbing peptides, secreted from community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). The PSMα-induced NETs contained the typical protein markers and were able to capture microbes. The PSMα-induced NET structures were disintegrated upon prolonged exposure to DNase-positive S. aureus but not on exposure to DNase-negative Candida albicans. Opposed to classic NETosis, PSMα-triggered NET formation occurred very rapidly, independently of ROS or MPO, and was also manifest at 4°C. These data indicate that rapid NETs release may result from cytotoxic membrane disturbance by PSMα peptides, a process that may be of importance for CA-MRSA virulence

Impact of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter and heart failure in the elderly—results of a retrospective multi-center study

IntroductionWhile in the CASTLE-AF trial, in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, interventional therapy using pulmonary vein isolation was associated with outcome improvement, data on cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (CTIA) in atrial flutter (AFL) in the elderly is rare.MethodsWe included 96 patients between 60 and 85 years with typical AFL and heart failure with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF/HFmrEF) treated in two medical centers. 48 patients underwent an electrophysiological study with CTIA, whereas 48 patients received rate or rhythm control and guideline-compliant heart failure therapy. Patients were followed up for 2 years, with emphasis on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) over time. Primary endpoints were cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization for cardiac causes.ResultsPatients with CTIA showed a significant increase in LVEF after 1 (p < 0.001) and 2 years (p < 0.001) in contrast to baseline LVEF. Improvement of LVEF in the CTIA group was associated with significantly lower 2-year mortality (p = 0.003). In the multivariate regression analysis, CTIA remained the relevant factor associated with LVEF improvement (HR: 2.845 CI:95% 1.044–7.755; p = 0.041). Elderly patients (≥ 70 years) further benefited from CTIA, since they showed a significantly reduced rehospitalization (p = 0.042) and mortality rate after 2 years (p = 0.013).ConclusionsCTIA in patients with typical AFL and HFrEF/HFmrEF was associated with significant improvement of LVEF and reduced mortality rates after 2 years. Patient age should not be a primary exclusion criterion for CTIA, since patients ≥70 years also seem to benefit from intervention in terms of mortality and hospitalization

Prophylactic rivaroxaban in the early post-discharge period reduces the rates of hospitalization for atrial fibrillation and incidence of sudden cardiac death during long-term follow-up in hospitalized COVID-19 survivors

Introduction: While acute Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affects the cardiovascular (CV) system according to recent data, an increased CV risk has been reported also during long-term follow-up (FU). In addition to other CV pathologies in COVID-19 survivors, an enhanced risk for arrhythmic events and sudden cardiac death (SCD) has been observed. While recommendations on post-discharge thromboprophylaxis are conflicting in this population, prophylactic short-term rivaroxaban therapy after hospital discharge showed promising results. However, the impact of this regimen on the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias has not been evaluated to date.Methods: To investigate the efficacy of this therapy, we conducted a single center, retrospective analysis of 1804 consecutive, hospitalized COVID-19 survivors between April and December 2020. Patients received either a 30-day post-discharge thromboprophylaxis treatment regimen using rivaroxaban 10 mg every day (QD) (Rivaroxaban group (Riva); n = 996) or no thromboprophylaxis (Control group (Ctrl); n = 808). Hospitalization for new atrial fibrillation (AF), new higher-degree Atrioventricular-block (AVB) as well as incidence of SCD were investigated in 12-month FU [FU: 347 (310/449) days].Results: No differences in baseline characteristics (Ctrl vs Riva: age: 59.0 (48.9/66.8) vs 57 (46.5/64.9) years, p = n.s.; male: 41.5% vs 43.7%, p = n.s.) and in the history of relevant CV-disease were observed between the two groups. While hospitalizations for AVB were not reported in either group, relevant rates of hospitalizations for new AF (0.99%, n = 8/808) as well as a high rate of SCD events (2.35%, n = 19/808) were seen in the Ctrl. These cardiac events were attenuated by early post-discharge prophylactic rivaroxaban therapy (AF: n = 2/996, 0.20%, p = 0.026 and SCD: n = 3/996, 0.30%, p < 0.001) which was also observed after applying a logistic regression model for propensity score matching (AF: χ2-statistics = 6.45, p = 0.013 and SCD: χ2-statistics = 9.33, p = 0.002). Of note, no major bleeding complications were observed in either group.Conclusion: Atrial arrhythmic and SCD events are present during the first 12 months after hospitalization for COVID-19. Extended prophylactic Rivaroxaban therapy after hospital discharge could reduce new onset of AF and SCD in hospitalized COVID-19 survivors

Methotrexate safety and efficacy in combination therapies in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis : a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial (NORD-STAR)

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.OBJECTIVE: To investigate methotrexate safety and influence of dose on efficacy outcomes in combination with three different biological treatments and with active conventional treatment (ACT) in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This post-hoc analysis included 812 treatment-naïve early RA patients who were randomized (1:1:1:1) in the NORD-STAR trial (NCT01491815) to receive methotrexate in combination with ACT, certolizumab-pegol, abatacept, or tocilizumab. Methotrexate safety, doses, and dose effects on Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission were assessed after 24 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Compared with ACT, the prevalence of methotrexate-associated side effects was higher when methotrexate was combined with tocilizumab (HR 1.48 [95% CI 1.20 to 1.84]), but not with certolizumab-pegol (HR 0.99 [0.79 to 1.23]) or with abatacept (HR 0.93 [0.75 to 1.16]). With ACT as the reference, methotrexate dose was significantly lower when used in combination with tocilizumab (β -4.65 [95% CI -5.83 to -3.46], p<0.001), with abatacept (β -1.15 [-2.27 to -0.03], p=0.04), and numerically lower in combination with certolizumab-pegol (β -1.07 [-2.21 to 0.07], p=0.07). Methotrexate dose reductions were not associated with decreased CDAI remission rates within any of the treatment combinations. CONCLUSION: Methotrexate was generally well tolerated in combination therapies, but adverse events were a limiting factor in receiving the target dose of 25 mg/week, and these were more frequent in combination with tocilizumab versus active conventional treatment. On the other hand, methotrexate dose reductions were not associated with decreased CDAI remission rates within any of the four treatment combinations at 24 weeks. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.Peer reviewe