8 research outputs found

    Effektivitet och produktivitet -när kunder blir en medarbetare!

    No full text
    Problem: Arbetsprocessen vid traditionella kassasystem är långsam och slitsam. Introduktionen av självscanning förändrar situationen genom att fördela arbete till kunden, denna nya relation för med sig påverkan på butikerna. Syfte: Syftet med uppsatsen är att ur butikens synvinkel visa vinster som uppkommer, samt undersöka hur man agerat, vid implementeringen av ett rationaliserande betalningssystem. Uppsatsen vill även påvisa skillnader mellan två stora dagligvarukedjor. Metod: Vi har valt att studera Coop Forum i Eskilstuna och i Västerås samt Ica Maxi i Eskilstuna. I respektive butik har huvudansvariga personer för självscanningssystemet intervjuats med hjälp av semistrukturerade frågor. Data har samlats in och sammanställts på ett kvalitativt sätt. Slutsats: Butikerna har satsat på att få kunderna som användare av självscanningen för att frigöra personal och öka sin produktivitet. För att det ska fungera påvisar butikerna fördelar för de involverade. Kunden tar över arbete och kortar ner processen med personalen, vilket gör att deras insats ökar effektiviteten och produktiviteten. Personalen kan då få bättre arbetsförhållanden vid kassorna och mer skiftande arbete med flera uppgifter

    Referral Indications for Malignant Hyperthermia Susceptibility Diagnostics in Patients without Adverse Anesthetic Events in the Era of Next-generation Sequencing

    No full text
    Background: The introduction of next-generation sequencing into the diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders has resulted in an increased number of newly identified RYR1 variants. The hypothesis was that there is an increased referral of patients to malignant hyperthermia units without a personal/family history of adverse anesthetic events suspected to be malignant hyperthermia. This retrospective multicenter cohort study evaluates patient referral indications and outcomes for those without a history of an adverse anesthetic event. Methods: Patients referred between 2010 and 2019 to the malignant hyperthermia units in Antwerp, Belgium; Lund, Sweden; Nijmegen, The Netherlands; and Toronto, Ontario, Canada were included. Previously tested patients and relatives of previously tested patients were excluded. Data collection included demographics, referral details, muscle contracture, and genetic testing results including Rare Exome Variant Ensemble Learner scores. Referral indications were categorized into those with a personal/family history of adverse anesthetic event and other indications including exertional and/or recurrent rhabdomyolysis, RYR1 variant(s) detected in diagnostic testing in the neuromuscular clinic without a specific diagnosis (in a family member), diagnosed RYR1-related myopathy (in a family member), idiopathically elevated resting creatine kinase values, exertional heat stroke, and other. Results: A total of 520 medical records were included, with the three most frequent referral indications as follows: personal history of an adverse anesthetic event (211 of 520; 40.6%), family history of an adverse anesthetic event (115 of 520; 22.1%), and exertional and/or recurrent rhabdomyolysis (46 of 520; 8.8%). The proportion of patients referred without a personal/family history of an adverse anesthetic event increased to 43.6% (133 of 305) between 2015 and 2019 compared to 28.4% (61 of 215) in 2010 to 2014 (P < 0.001). Patients with a personal/family history of an adverse anesthetic event were more frequently diagnosed as malignant hyperthermia-susceptible (133 of 220; 60.5%) than those without (47 of 120; 39.2%; P < 0.001). Due to missing data, 180 medical records were excluded. Conclusions: The proportion of patients referred to malignant hyperthermia units without a personal/family history of an adverse anesthetic event has increased, with 39.2% (47 of 120) diagnosed as malignant hyperthermia-susceptible

    Pre-operative exercise and pyrexia as modifying factors in malignant hyperthermia (MH)

    No full text
    Malignant hyperthermia (MH) is a life-threatening reaction triggered by volatile anesthetics and succinylcholine. MH is caused by mutations in the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor (RYR1) gene, as is rhabdomyolysis triggered by exertion and/or pyrexia. The discrepancy between the prevalence of risk genotypes and actual MH incidence remains unexplained. We investigated the role of pre-operative exercise and pyrexia as potential MH modifying factors. We included cases from 5 MH referral centers with 1) clinical features suggestive of MH, 2) confirmation of MH susceptibility on Contracture Testing (IVCT or CHCT) and/or RYR1 genetic testing, and a history of 3) strenuous exercise within 72 h and/or pyrexia >37.5 °C prior to the triggering anesthetic. Characteristics of MH-triggering agents, surgery and succinylcholine use were collected. We identified 41 cases with general anesthesias resulting in an MH event (GA+MH, n = 41) within 72 h of strenuous exercise and/or pyrexia. We also identified previous general anesthesias without MH events (GA-MH, n = 51) in the index cases and their MH susceptible relatives. Apart from pre-operative exercise and/or pyrexia, trauma and acute abdomen as surgery indications, emergency surgery and succinylcholine use were also more common with GA+MH events. These observations suggest a link between pre-operative exercise, pyrexia and MH

    European Neuromuscular Centre consensus statement on anaesthesia in patients with neuromuscular disorders

    No full text
    BACKGROUND Patients with neuromuscular conditions are at increased risk of suffering peri-operative complications related to anaesthesia. There is currently little specific anaesthetic guidance concerning these patients. Here we present the European Neuromuscular Centre (ENMC) consensus statement on anaesthesia in patients with neuromuscular disorders as formulated during the 259th ENMC workshop on Anaesthesia in neuromuscular disorders. METHODS International experts in the field of (paediatric) anaesthesia, neurology and genetics were invited to participate in the ENMC workshop. A literature search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE whose main findings were disseminated to the participants and presented during the workshop. Depending on specific expertise, participants presented the existing evidence and their expert opinion concerning anaesthetic management in six specific groups of myopathies and neuromuscular junction disorders. The consensus statement was prepared according to the Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch & Evaluation (AGREE II) reporting checklist. The level of evidence has been adapted according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) grading system. The final consensus statement was subjected to a modified Delphi process. RESULTS A set of general recommendations valid for the anaesthetic management of patients with neuromuscular disorders in general have been formulated. Specific recommendations were formulated for 1) neuromuscular junction disorders; 2) muscle channelopathies (non-dystrophic myotonia and periodic paralysis); 3) myotonic dystrophy (type 1 and 2); 4) muscular dystrophies; 5) congenital myopathies and congenital dystrophies and 6) mitochondrial and metabolic myopathies. CONCLUSION This ENMC consensus statement summarizes the most important considerations for planning and performing anaesthesia in patients with neuromuscular disorders

    The European Neuromuscular Centre Consensus Statement on Anaesthesia in Patients with Neuromuscular Disorders.

    No full text
    BACKGROUND Patients with neuromuscular conditions are at increased risk of suffering peri-operative complications related to anaesthesia. There is currently little specific anaesthetic guidance concerning these patients. Here we present the European Neuromuscular Centre (ENMC) consensus statement on anaesthesia in patients with neuromuscular disorders as formulated during the 259th ENMC workshop on Anaesthesia in neuromuscular disorders. METHODS International experts in the field of (paediatric) anaesthesia, neurology and genetics were invited to participate in the ENMC workshop. A literature search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE whose main findings were disseminated to the participants and presented during the workshop. Depending on specific expertise, participants presented the existing evidence and their expert opinion concerning anaesthetic management in six specific groups of myopathies and neuromuscular junction disorders. The consensus statement was prepared according to the Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch & Evaluation (AGREE II) reporting checklist. The level of evidence has been adapted according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) grading system. The final consensus statement was subjected to a modified Delphi process. RESULTS A set of general recommendations valid for the anaesthetic management of patients with neuromuscular disorders in general have been formulated. Specific recommendations were formulated for 1) neuromuscular junction disorders; 2) muscle channelopathies (non-dystrophic myotonia and periodic paralysis); 3) myotonic dystrophy (type 1 and 2); 4) muscular dystrophies; 5) congenital myopathies and congenital dystrophies and 6) mitochondrial and metabolic myopathies. CONCLUSION This ENMC consensus statement summarizes the most important considerations for planning and performing anaesthesia in patients with neuromuscular disorders

    Management practices for postdural puncture headache in obstetrics: a prospective, international, cohort study

    No full text
    © 2020 British Journal of AnaesthesiaBackground: Accidental dural puncture is an uncommon complication of epidural analgesia and can cause postdural puncture headache (PDPH). We aimed to describe management practices and outcomes after PDPH treated by epidural blood patch (EBP) or no EBP. Methods: Following ethics committee approval, patients who developed PDPH after accidental dural puncture were recruited from participating countries and divided into two groups, those receiving EBP or no EBP. Data registered included patient and procedure characteristics, headache symptoms and intensity, management practices, and complications. Follow-up was at 3 months. Results: A total of 1001 patients from 24 countries were included, of which 647 (64.6%) received an EBP and 354 (35.4%) did not receive an EBP (no-EBP). Higher initial headache intensity was associated with greater use of EBP, odds ratio 1.29 (95% confidence interval 1.19–1.41) per pain intensity unit increase. Headache intensity declined sharply at 4 h after EBP and 127 (19.3%) patients received a second EBP. On average, no or mild headache (numeric rating score≤3) was observed 7 days after diagnosis. Intracranial bleeding was diagnosed in three patients (0.46%), and backache, headache, and analgesic use were more common at 3 months in the EBP group. Conclusions: Management practices vary between countries, but EBP was more often used in patients with greater initial headache intensity. EBP reduced headache intensity quickly, but about 20% of patients needed a second EBP. After 7 days, most patients had no or mild headache. Backache, headache, and analgesic use were more common at 3 months in patients receiving an EBP

    Management practices for postdural puncture headache in obstetrics : a prospective, international, cohort study

    No full text
    Background: Accidental dural puncture is an uncommon complication of epidural analgesia and can cause postdural puncture headache (PDPH). We aimed to describe management practices and outcomes after PDPH treated by epidural blood patch (EBP) or no EBP. Methods: Following ethics committee approval, patients who developed PDPH after accidental dural puncture were recruited from participating countries and divided into two groups, those receiving EBP or no EBP. Data registered included patient and procedure characteristics, headache symptoms and intensity, management practices, and complications. Follow-up was at 3 months. Results: A total of 1001 patients from 24 countries were included, of which 647 (64.6%) received an EBP and 354 (35.4%) did not receive an EBP (no-EBP). Higher initial headache intensity was associated with greater use of EBP, odds ratio 1.29 (95% confidence interval 1.19-1.41) per pain intensity unit increase. Headache intensity declined sharply at 4 h after EBP and 127 (19.3%) patients received a second EBP. On average, no or mild headache (numeric rating score <= 3) was observed 7 days after diagnosis. Intracranial bleeding was diagnosed in three patients (0.46%), and backache, headache, and analgesic use were more common at 3 months in the EBP group. Conclusions: Management practices vary between countries, but EBP was more often used in patients with greater initial headache intensity. EBP reduced headache intensity quickly, but about 20% of patients needed a second EBP. After 7 days, most patients had no or mild headache. Backache, headache, and analgesic use were more common at 3 months in patients receiving an EBP
    corecore