Report from the Tri-Agency Cosmological Simulation Task Force

The Tri-Agency Cosmological Simulations (TACS) Task Force was formed when Program Managers from the Department of Energy (DOE), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and the National Science Foundation (NSF) expressed an interest in receiving input into the cosmological simulations landscape related to the upcoming DOE/NSF Vera Rubin Observatory (Rubin), NASA/ESA's Euclid, and NASA's Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST). The Co-Chairs of TACS, Katrin Heitmann and Alina Kiessling, invited community scientists from the USA and Europe who are each subject matter experts and are also members of one or more of the surveys to contribute. The following report represents the input from TACS that was delivered to the Agencies in December 2018.Comment: 36 pages, 3 figures. Delivered to NASA, NSF, and DOE in Dec 201

LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products

(Abridged) We describe here the most ambitious survey currently planned in the optical, the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST). A vast array of science will be enabled by a single wide-deep-fast sky survey, and LSST will have unique survey capability in the faint time domain. The LSST design is driven by four main science themes: probing dark energy and dark matter, taking an inventory of the Solar System, exploring the transient optical sky, and mapping the Milky Way. LSST will be a wide-field ground-based system sited at Cerro Pach\'{o}n in northern Chile. The telescope will have an 8.4 m (6.5 m effective) primary mirror, a 9.6 deg$^2$ field of view, and a 3.2 Gigapixel camera. The standard observing sequence will consist of pairs of 15-second exposures in a given field, with two such visits in each pointing in a given night. With these repeats, the LSST system is capable of imaging about 10,000 square degrees of sky in a single filter in three nights. The typical 5$\sigma$ point-source depth in a single visit in $r$ will be $\sim 24.5$ (AB). The project is in the construction phase and will begin regular survey operations by 2022. The survey area will be contained within 30,000 deg$^2$ with $\delta<+34.5^\circ$, and will be imaged multiple times in six bands, $ugrizy$, covering the wavelength range 320--1050 nm. About 90\% of the observing time will be devoted to a deep-wide-fast survey mode which will uniformly observe a 18,000 deg$^2$ region about 800 times (summed over all six bands) during the anticipated 10 years of operations, and yield a coadded map to $r\sim27.5$. The remaining 10\% of the observing time will be allocated to projects such as a Very Deep and Fast time domain survey. The goal is to make LSST data products, including a relational database of about 32 trillion observations of 40 billion objects, available to the public and scientists around the world.Comment: 57 pages, 32 color figures, version with high-resolution figures available from https://www.lsst.org/overvie

SPHEREx: NASA's near-infrared spectrophotometric all-sky survey

SPHEREx, the Spectro-Photometer for the History of the Universe, Epoch of Reionization, and ices Explorer, is a NASA MIDEX mission planned for launch in 2024. SPHEREx will carry out the first all-sky spectral survey at wavelengths between 0.75µm and 5µm with spectral resolving power ~40 between 0.75 and 3.8µm and ~120 between 3.8 and 5µm At the end of its two-year mission, SPHEREx will provide 0.75-to-5µm spectra of each 6.”2 x 6.”2 pixel on the sky - 14 billion spectra in all. This paper updates an earlier description of SPHEREx presenting changes made during the mission's Preliminary Design Phase, including a discussion of instrument integration and test ow and a summary of the data processing, analysis, and distribution plans

A Deeper Look at DES Dwarf Galaxy Candidates: Grus I and Indus II

We present deep g- and r-band Magellan/Megacam photometry of two dwarf galaxy candidates discovered in the Dark Energy Survey (DES), Grus I and Indus II (DES J2038-4609). For the case of Grus I, we resolved the main sequence turn-off (MSTO) and similar to 2 mags below it. The MSTO can be seen at g(0) similar to 24 with a photometric uncertainty of 0.03 mag. We show Grus I to be consistent with an old, metal-poor (similar to 13.3 Gyr, [Fe/H] similar to -1.9) dwarf galaxy. We derive updated distance and structural parameters for Grus I using this deep, uniform, wide-field data set. We find an azimuthally-averaged halflight radius more than two times larger (similar to 151(-31)(+21) pc; similar to 4'. 16(-0.74)(+0.54)) and an absolute V-band magnitude similar to-4.1 that is similar to 1 magnitude brighter than previous studies. We obtain updated distance, ellipticity, and centroid parameters that are in agreement with other studies within uncertainties. Although our photometry of Indus II is similar to 2-3 magnitudes deeper than the DES Y1 public release, we find no coherent stellar population at its reported location. The original detection was located in an incomplete region of sky in the DES Y2Q1 data set and was flagged due to potential blue horizontal branch member stars. The best-fit isochrone parameters are physically inconsistent with both dwarf galaxies and globular clusters. We conclude that Indus II is likely a false positive, flagged due to a chance alignment of stars along the line of sight

Constraints on dark matter to dark radiation conversion in the late universe with DES-Y1 and external data

84siWe study a class of decaying dark matter models as a possible resolution to the observed discrepancies between early- and late-time probes of the universe. This class of models, dubbed DDM, characterizes the evolution of comoving dark matter density with two extra parameters. We investigate how DDM affects key cosmological observables such as the CMB temperature and matter power spectra. Combining 3x2pt data from Year 1 of the Dark Energy Survey,Planck-2018 CMB temperature and polarization data, Supernova (SN) Type Ia data from Pantheon, and BAO data from BOSS DR12, MGS and 6dFGS, we place new constraints on the amount of dark matter that has decayed and the rate with which it converts to dark radiation. The fraction of the decayed dark matter in units of the current amount of dark matter, $zeta$, is constrained at 68% confidence level to be <0.32 for DES-Y1 3x2pt data, <0.030 for CMB+SN+BAO data, and <0.037 for the combined dataset. The probability that the DES and CMB+SN+BAO datasets are concordant increases from 4% for the $Lambda$CDM model to 8% (less tension) for DDM. Moreover, tension in $S_8=sigma_8sqrt{Omega_m/0.3}$ between DES-Y1 3x2pt and CMB+SN+BAO is reduced from 2.3$sigma$ to 1.9$sigma$. We find no reduction in the Hubble tension when the combined data is compared to distance-ladder measurements in the DDM model. The maximum-posterior goodness-of-fit statistics of DDM and $Lambda$CDM are comparable, indicating no preference for the DDM cosmology over $Lambda$CDM....partially_openopenChen, Angela; Huterer, Dragan; Lee, Sujeong; Ferté, Agnès; Weaverdyck, Noah; Alonso Alves, Otavio; Leonard, C. Danielle; MacCrann, Niall; Raveri, Marco; Porredon, Anna; Di Valentino, Eleonora; Muir, Jessica; Lemos, Pablo; Liddle, Andrew; Blazek, Jonathan; Campos, Andresa; Cawthon, Ross; Choi, Ami; Dodelson, Scott; Elvin-Poole, Jack; Gruen, Daniel; Ross, Ashley; Secco, Lucas F.; Sevilla, Ignacio; Sheldon, Erin; Troxel, Michael A.; Zuntz, Joe; Abbott, Tim; Aguena, Michel; Allam, Sahar; Annis, James; Avila, Santiago; Bertin, Emmanuel; Bhargava, Sunayana; Bridle, Sarah; Brooks, David; Carnero Rosell, Aurelio; Carrasco Kind, Matias; Carretero, Jorge; Costanzi, Matteo; Crocce, Martin; da Costa, Luiz; Elidaiana da Silva Pereira, Maria; Davis, Tamara; Doel, Peter; Eifler, Tim; Ferrero, Ismael; Fosalba, Pablo; Frieman, Josh; Garcia-Bellido, Juan; Gaztanaga, Enrique; Gerdes, David; Gruendl, Robert; Gschwend, Julia; Gutierrez, Gaston; Hinton, Samuel; Hollowood, Devon L.; Honscheid, Klaus; Hoyle, Ben; James, David; Jarvis, Mike; Kuehn, Kyler; Lahav, Ofer; Maia, Marcio; Marshall, Jennifer; Menanteau, Felipe; Miquel, Ramon; Morgan, Robert; Palmese, Antonella; Paz-Chinchon, Francisco; Plazas Malagón, Andrés; Roodman, Aaron; Sanchez, Eusebio; Scarpine, Vic; Schubnell, Michael; Serrano, Santiago; Smith, Mathew; Suchyta, Eric; Tarle, Gregory; Thomas, Daniel; To, Chun-Hao; Varga, Tamas Norbert; Weller, Jochen; Wilkinson, ReeseChen, Angela; Huterer, Dragan; Lee, Sujeong; Ferté, Agnès; Weaverdyck, Noah; Alonso Alves, Otavio; Leonard, C. Danielle; Maccrann, Niall; Raveri, Marco; Porredon, Anna; Di Valentino, Eleonora; Muir, Jessica; Lemos, Pablo; Liddle, Andrew; Blazek, Jonathan; Campos, Andresa; Cawthon, Ross; Choi, Ami; Dodelson, Scott; Elvin-Poole, Jack; Gruen, Daniel; Ross, Ashley; Secco, Lucas F.; Sevilla, Ignacio; Sheldon, Erin; Troxel, Michael A.; Zuntz, Joe; Abbott, Tim; Aguena, Michel; Allam, Sahar; Annis, James; Avila, Santiago; Bertin, Emmanuel; Bhargava, Sunayana; Bridle, Sarah; Brooks, David; Carnero Rosell, Aurelio; Carrasco Kind, Matias; Carretero, Jorge; Costanzi, Matteo; Crocce, Martin; da Costa, Luiz; Elidaiana da Silva Pereira, Maria; Davis, Tamara; Doel, Peter; Eifler, Tim; Ferrero, Ismael; Fosalba, Pablo; Frieman, Josh; Garcia-Bellido, Juan; Gaztanaga, Enrique; Gerdes, David; Gruendl, Robert; Gschwend, Julia; Gutierrez, Gaston; Hinton, Samuel; Hollowood, Devon L.; Honscheid, Klaus; Hoyle, Ben; James, David; Jarvis, Mike; Kuehn, Kyler; Lahav, Ofer; Maia, Marcio; Marshall, Jennifer; Menanteau, Felipe; Miquel, Ramon; Morgan, Robert; Palmese, Antonella; Paz-Chinchon, Francisco; Plazas Malagón, Andrés; Roodman, Aaron; Sanchez, Eusebio; Scarpine, Vic; Schubnell, Michael; Serrano, Santiago; Smith, Mathew; Suchyta, Eric; Tarle, Gregory; Thomas, Daniel; Chun-Hao, To; Varga, Tamas Norbert; Weller, Jochen; Wilkinson, Rees