Population-based incidence rates of 15 neuromuscular disorders:a nationwide capture-recapture study in the Netherlands

Most neuromuscular disorders are rare, but as a group they are not. Nevertheless, epidemiological data of specific neuromuscular disorders are scarce, especially on the incidence. We applied a capture-recapture approach to a nationwide hospital-based dataset and a patients association-based dataset to estimate the annual incidence rates for fifteen neuromuscular disorders in the Netherlands. The annual incidence rates per 100,000 population varied from 0.03/100,000 (95% CI 0.00 ‒ 0.06) for glycogenosis type 5 to 0.9/100,000 (95% confidence interval 0.7 ‒ 1.0) for myotonic dystrophy type 1. The summed annual incidence rate of these disorders was 4.1 per 100,000 per population. Nine of the provided incidence rates were previously unavailable, three rates were similar to the rates in the literature, and three rates were generally higher compared to previous findings but with overlapping confidence intervals. This study provides nationwide incidence rates for fifteen neuromuscular disorders predominantly diagnosed in adult life, nine which were previously unavailable. The capture-recapture approach provided estimates of the total number of individuals with neuromuscular disorders. To complete the gaps in the knowledge of disease frequencies, there is a need for estimates from an automated, obligatory data collection system of diagnosed and newly diagnosed patients with neuromuscular disorders.</p

Population-based incidence rates of 15 neuromuscular disorders: a nationwide capture-recapture study in the Netherlands

Most neuromuscular disorders are rare, but as a group they are not. Nevertheless, epidemiological data of specific neuromuscular disorders are scarce, especially on the incidence. We applied a capture-recapture approach to a nationwide hospital-based dataset and a patients association-based dataset to estimate the annual incidence rates for fifteen neuromuscular disorders in the Netherlands. The annual incidence rates per 100,000 population varied from 0.03/100,000 (95% CI 0.00 ‒ 0.06) for glycogenosis type 5 to 0.9/100,000 (95% confidence interval 0.7 ‒ 1.0) for myotonic dystrophy type 1. The summed annual incidence rate of these disorders was 4.1 per 100,000 per population. Nine of the provided incidence rates were previously unavailable, three rates were similar to the rates in the literature, and three rates were generally higher compared to previous findings but with overlapping confidence intervals. This study provides nationwide incidence rates for fifteen neuromuscular disorders predominantly diagnosed in adult life, nine which were previously unavailable. The capture-recapture approach provided estimates of the total number of individuals with neuromuscular disorders. To complete the gaps in the knowledge of disease frequencies, there is a need for estimates from an automated, obligatory data collection system of diagnosed and newly diagnosed patients with neuromuscular disorders

Lifelong Exercise Patterns and Cardiovascular Health.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between lifelong exercise dose and the prevalence of cardiovascular morbidity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 1, 2011, through December 31, 2014, 21,266 individuals completed an online questionnaire regarding their lifelong exercise patterns and cardiovascular health status. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) was defined as a diagnosis of myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure, and cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) were defined as hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, or type 2 diabetes. Lifelong exercise patterns were measured over a median of 32 years for 405 patients with CVD, 1379 patients with CVRFs, and 10,656 controls. Participants were categorized into nonexercisers and quintiles (Q1-Q5) of exercise dose (metabolic equivalent task [MET] minutes per week). RESULTS: The CVD/CVRF prevalence was lower for each exercise quintile compared with nonexercisers (CVD: nonexercisers, 9.6% vs Q1: 4.4%, Q2: 2.8%, Q3: 2.4%, Q4: 3.6%, Q5: 3.9%; P<.001; CVRF: nonexercisers, 24.6% vs Q1: 13.8%, Q2: 10.2%, Q3: 9.0%, Q4: 9.4%, Q5: 12.0%; P<.001). The lowest exercise dose (Q1) significantly reduced CVD and CVRF prevalence, but the largest reductions were found at 764 to 1091 MET-min/wk for CVD (adjusted odds ratio=0.31; 95% CI, 0.20-0.48) and CVRFs (adjusted odds ratio=0.36; 95% CI, 0.28-0.47). The CVD/CVRF prevalence did not further decrease in higher exercise dose groups. Exercise intensity did not influence the relationship between exercise patterns and CVD or CVRFs. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate a curvilinear relationship between lifelong exercise patterns and cardiovascular morbidity. Low exercise doses can effectively reduce CVD/CVRF prevalence, but engagement in exercise for 764 to 1091 MET-min/wk is associated with the lowest CVD/CVRF prevalence. Higher exercise doses do not yield additional benefits

An assessment of the most reliable method to estimate the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine: Analysis of a prospective cohort of 138 cases

OBJECTIVE: Although there is increasing recognition of the importance of cervical spinal sagittal balance, there is a lack of consensus as to the optimal method to accurately assess the cervical sagittal alignment. Cervical alignment is important for surgical decision making. Sagittal balance of the cervical spine is generally assessed using one of two methods; namely, measuring the angle between C-2 and C-7, and drawing a line between C-2 and C-7. Here, the best method to assess sagittal alignment of the cervical spine is investigated. METHODS: Data from 138 patients enrolled in a randomized controlled trial (Procon) were analyzed. Two investigators independently measured the angle between C-2 and C-7 by using Harrison's posterior tangent method, and also estimated the shape of the sagittal curve by using a modified Toyama method. The mean angles of each quantitative assessment of the sagittal alignment were calculated and the results were compared. The interrater reliability for both methods was estimated using Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: For both methods the interrater reliability was high: for the posterior tangent method it was 0.907 and for the modified Toyama technique it was 0.984. For a lordotic cervical spine, defined by the modified Toyama method, the mean angle (defined by Harrison's posterior tangent method) was 23.4° ± 9.9° (range 0.4°-52.4°), for a kyphotic cervical spine it was -2.2° ± 9.2° (range -16.1° to 16.9°), and for a straight cervical spine it was 10.5° ± 8.2° (range -11° to 36°). CONCLUSIONS: An absolute measurement of the angle between C-2 and C-7 does not unequivocally define the sagittal cervical alignment. As can be seen from the minimum and maximum values, even a positive angle between C-2 and C-7 could be present in a kyphotic spine. For this purpose, the modified Toyama method (drawing a line from the posterior inferior part of the vertebral body of C-2 to the posterior upper part of the vertebral body of C-7 without any measurements) is a better tool for a global assessment of cervical sagittal alignment

Assessment of medication use during pregnancy by Web-based questionnaires, pharmacy records and serum screening

Objective: To compare assessment of early pregnancy medication exposure using three methods of data collection. Methods: Serum samples were obtained from 752 women participating in the PRegnancy and Infant DEvelopment (PRIDE) Study before gestational week 17. For 52 women using medication at the date of blood sampling according to Web-based questionnaires or pharmacy records, we analysed serum samples using untargeted liquid chromatography time-of-flight spectrometry. Results: Medication was detected in 18 serum samples (35%). Medications taken orally for chronic conditions reported in the questionnaire were detected in serum and vice versa. Pharmacy records did not identify additional exposed women, but missed exposure in 5 women mainly due to unavailability. We observed substantial discordance between the three methods for inhaled medication, dermatological preparations, and medications for short-term use, which went often undetected in serum. Conclusions: It remains challenging to assess medication use in large-scale studies as no ‘gold standard’ is currently available

No supportive evidence for clinical benefit of routine follow-up in ovarian cancer: a Dutch multicenter study

Contains fulltext : 97161.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)INTRODUCTION: Routine follow-up is standard medical practice in ovarian cancer patients treated with curative intent. However, no strong evidence exists indicating that prognosis is improved. The objective of this study was to evaluate the routine follow-up schedule for ovarian cancer patients regarding the adherence to the Dutch protocol, the detection of recurrences, and the follow-up's impact on overall survival. METHODS: All 579 consecutive patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer in 4 Dutch hospitals between 1996 and 2006 were selected. Only patients in complete clinical remission after primary treatment were studied. Compliance to the Dutch follow-up guideline was assessed in a random sample of 68 patients. Of the 127 patients with recurrence, the mode of recurrence detection was addressed. Survival time since primary treatment was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The patients received more follow-up visits than was recommended according to the guideline. The cumulative 5-year risk of recurrence was 55% (95% confidence interval [CI], 43%-67%). The survival of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer detected asymptomatically at a routine visit (n = 51) tended to be better compared with patients with symptomatic detection at a routine (n = 31) or diagnosed after an interval visit (n = 31). The median survival times were 44 (95% CI, 38-64), 29 (95% CI, 21-38), and 33 months (95% CI, 19-61), respectively (P = 0.08). The median time from primary treatment to recurrence was similar for the 3 groups: 14, 10, and 11 months, respectively (P = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up in line with (inter)national guidelines yields a seemingly longer life expectancy if the recurrence was detected asymptomatically. However, this result is expected to be explained by differences in tumor biology and length-time bias