Infected pancreatic necrosis: outcomes and clinical predictors of mortality. A post hoc analysis of the MANCTRA-1 international study

: The identification of high-risk patients in the early stages of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) is critical, because it could help the clinicians to adopt more effective management strategies. We conducted a post hoc analysis of the MANCTRA-1 international study to assess the association between clinical risk factors and mortality among adult patients with IPN. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify prognostic factors of mortality. We identified 247 consecutive patients with IPN hospitalised between January 2019 and December 2020. History of uncontrolled arterial hypertension (p = 0.032; 95% CI 1.135-15.882; aOR 4.245), qSOFA (p = 0.005; 95% CI 1.359-5.879; aOR 2.828), renal failure (p = 0.022; 95% CI 1.138-5.442; aOR 2.489), and haemodynamic failure (p = 0.018; 95% CI 1.184-5.978; aOR 2.661), were identified as independent predictors of mortality in IPN patients. Cholangitis (p = 0.003; 95% CI 1.598-9.930; aOR 3.983), abdominal compartment syndrome (p = 0.032; 95% CI 1.090-6.967; aOR 2.735), and gastrointestinal/intra-abdominal bleeding (p = 0.009; 95% CI 1.286-5.712; aOR 2.710) were independently associated with the risk of mortality. Upfront open surgical necrosectomy was strongly associated with the risk of mortality (p < 0.001; 95% CI 1.912-7.442; aOR 3.772), whereas endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrosis (p = 0.018; 95% CI 0.138-0.834; aOR 0.339) and enteral nutrition (p = 0.003; 95% CI 0.143-0.716; aOR 0.320) were found as protective factors. Organ failure, acute cholangitis, and upfront open surgical necrosectomy were the most significant predictors of mortality. Our study confirmed that, even in a subgroup of particularly ill patients such as those with IPN, upfront open surgery should be avoided as much as possible. Study protocol registered in ClinicalTrials.Gov (I.D. Number NCT04747990)

Burnout among surgeons before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: an international survey

Background: SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has had many significant impacts within the surgical realm, and surgeons have been obligated to reconsider almost every aspect of daily clinical practice. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study reported in compliance with the CHERRIES guidelines and conducted through an online platform from June 14th to July 15th, 2020. The primary outcome was the burden of burnout during the pandemic indicated by the validated Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure. Results: Nine hundred fifty-four surgeons completed the survey. The median length of practice was 10 years; 78.2% included were male with a median age of 37 years old, 39.5% were consultants, 68.9% were general surgeons, and 55.7% were affiliated with an academic institution. Overall, there was a significant increase in the mean burnout score during the pandemic; longer years of practice and older age were significantly associated with less burnout. There were significant reductions in the median number of outpatient visits, operated cases, on-call hours, emergency visits, and research work, so, 48.2% of respondents felt that the training resources were insufficient. The majority (81.3%) of respondents reported that their hospitals were included in the management of COVID-19, 66.5% felt their roles had been minimized; 41% were asked to assist in non-surgical medical practices, and 37.6% of respondents were included in COVID-19 management. Conclusions: There was a significant burnout among trainees. Almost all aspects of clinical and research activities were affected with a significant reduction in the volume of research, outpatient clinic visits, surgical procedures, on-call hours, and emergency cases hindering the training. Trial registration: The study was registered on clicaltrials.gov "NCT04433286" on 16/06/2020

Breast cancer differential diagnosis using diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging and regression with z-score normalized data.

SignificanceCurrent imaging paradigms for differential diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions suffer from high false positive rates that force patients to undergo unnecessary biopsies. Diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging (DOSI) noninvasively probes functional hemodynamic and compositional parameters in deep tissue and has been shown to be sensitive to contrast between normal and malignant tissues.AimDOSI methods are under investigation as an adjunct to mammography and ultrasound that could reduce false positive rates and unnecessary biopsies, particularly in radiographically dense breasts.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 212 subjects with suspicious breast lesions who underwent DOSI imaging. Physiological tissue parameters were z-score normalized to the patient's contralateral breast tissue and input to univariate logistic regression models to discriminate between malignant tumors and the surrounding normal tissue. The models were then used to differentiate malignant lesions from benign lesions.ResultsModels incorporating several individual hemodynamic parameters were able to accurately distinguish malignant tumors from both the surrounding background tissue and benign lesions with area under the curve (AUC) ≥0.85. Z-score normalization improved the discriminatory ability and calibration of these predictive models relative to unnormalized or ratio-normalized data.ConclusionsFindings from a large subject population study show how DOSI data normalization that accounts for normal tissue heterogeneity and quantitative statistical regression approaches can be combined to improve the ability of DOSI to diagnose malignant lesions. This improved diagnostic accuracy, combined with the modality's inherent logistical advantages of portability, low cost, and nonionizing radiation, could position DOSI as an effective adjunct modality that could be used to reduce the number of unnecessary invasive biopsies

Breast cancer differential diagnosis using diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging and regression with z-score normalized data.

Current imaging paradigms for differential diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions suffer from high false positive rates that force patients to undergo unnecessary biopsies. Diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging (DOSI) noninvasively probes functional hemodynamic and compositional parameters in deep tissue and has been shown to be sensitive to contrast between normal and malignant tissues. DOSI methods are under investigation as an adjunct to mammography and ultrasound that could reduce false positive rates and unnecessary biopsies, particularly in radiographically dense breasts. We performed a retrospective analysis of 212 subjects with suspicious breast lesions who underwent DOSI imaging. Physiological tissue parameters were z-score normalized to the patient's contralateral breast tissue and input to univariate logistic regression models to discriminate between malignant tumors and the surrounding normal tissue. The models were then used to differentiate malignant lesions from benign lesions. Models incorporating several individual hemodynamic parameters were able to accurately distinguish malignant tumors from both the surrounding background tissue and benign lesions with area under the curve (AUC) ≥0.85. Z-score normalization improved the discriminatory ability and calibration of these predictive models relative to unnormalized or ratio-normalized data. Findings from a large subject population study show how DOSI data normalization that accounts for normal tissue heterogeneity and quantitative statistical regression approaches can be combined to improve the ability of DOSI to diagnose malignant lesions. This improved diagnostic accuracy, combined with the modality's inherent logistical advantages of portability, low cost, and nonionizing radiation, could position DOSI as an effective adjunct modality that could be used to reduce the number of unnecessary invasive biopsies

Mapping breast cancer blood flow index, composition, and metabolism in a human subject using combined diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging and diffuse correlation spectroscopy

Diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging (DOSI) and diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) are modelbased near-infrared (NIR) methods that measure tissue optical properties (broadband absorption, mu(a), and reduced scattering, mu(s)) and blood flow (blood flow index, BFI), respectively. DOSI-derived mu(a) values are used to determine composition by calculating the tissue concentration of oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin(HbO2,HbR), water, and lipid. We developed and evaluated a combined, coregistered DOSI/ DCS handheld probe for mapping and imaging these parameters. We show that uncertainties of 0.3 mm(-1) (37%) in mu(s) and 0.003 mm(-1) (33%) in mu(a) lead to similar to 53% and 9% errors in BFI, respectively. DOSI/ DCS imaging of a solid tissue-simulating flow phantom and a breast cancer patient reveals well-defined spatial distributions of BFI and composition that clearly delineates both the flow channel and the tumor. BFI reconstructed with DOSI-corrected mu(a) and mu(s) values had a tumor/ normal contrast of 2.7, 50% higher than the contrast using commonly assumed fixed optical properties. In conclusion, spatially coregistered imaging of DOSI and DCS enhances intrinsic tumor contrast and information content. This is particularly important for imaging diseased tissues where there are significant spatial variations in mu(a) and mu(s) as well as potential uncoupling between flow and metabolism. (C) The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication,Funding Agencies|National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering [P41EB015890]; National Cancer Institute [R01CA142989, U54CA136400]; Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center [P30CA62203]; Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation; Fulbright Visiting Scholar grant; Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems (VINNOVA) [2015-0153]; NIH [P41-EB015893, 1R01NS060653]</p