LA (IN)CAPACIDAD DE RESPUESTA AL ODS NÚMERO 6 EN LOS MUNICIPIOS DE LA ZONA OTOMÍ-TEPEHUA (HIDALGO, MÉXICO)

Este artículo tiene como objetivo evaluar las posibilidades de los municipios de la zona Otomí-Tepehua de responder a las metas establecidas por el Objetivo del Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) número 6, puntualizando las brechas y acercamientos entre dicho objetivo y los programas establecidos por distintos niveles de gobierno. Además, se utiliza un análisis FODA que permite concluir que, a pesar de los avances logrados en términos de políticas públicas, es necesario que se fortalezcan las capacidades técnica, administrativa y financiera de los municipios, dado que por ley es en este nivel que las acciones deben ser efectivamente discutidas, planeadas y gestionadas

effects of three different diets on the fatty acid profile and sensory properties of fresh pecorino cheese primo sale

n/

The effect of System Intrauterine levonorgestrel (LNG-IUS) in the uterine artery flow, volume uterinoe Endometrial thickness in patients with endometriosis Pelvic: comparative study with the GnRH analogue (GnRHa)

Objetivos: O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar os índices de Pulsatilidade (IP) e Resistência (IR) das artérias uterinas, o volume uterino e a espessura endometrial após o uso do Sistema Intra-uterino de Levonorgestrel (SIU-LNG) ou do agonista do GnRHa (GnRHa) em pacientes portadoras de endometriose pélvica. Pacientes e métodos: Setenta e nove mulheres voluntárias, com idade entre 18 e 40 anos, foram incluídas neste ensaio clínico comparativo, prospectivo, randomizado e controlado. Dezoito foram eliminadas do estudo baseadas nos critérios de exclusão, As 61 pacientes remanescentes foram divididas em dois grupos: 31 pacientes fizeram parte do grupo SIU-LNG (uma foi excluída antes da inserção por apresentar-se grávida) e 30 fizeram parte do grupo GnRHa. Foram submetidasa exame ultra-sonográfico transvaginal bidimensional no dia em que iniciaram o tratamento (inserção do SIU-LNG ou administração de uma ampola de 3,75 mg de GnRHa por via intra-muscular) e seis meses após, avaliando a espessura endometrial, o volume uterino e os IR e IP das artérias uterinas. Resultados: Ambos tratamentos promoveram redução da espessura endometrial (6.08±3.00mm para 2.70±0.98mm e 6.96±3.82mm para 3.23±2.32mm - média ±SD, grupo SIU-LNG e grupo GnRHa, respectivamente). O volume uterino teve redução no grupo usuário do GnRHa (86.67±28.38cm3 para 55.27±25.52cm3) sem alteração significativa nas usuárias do SIU-LNG (75.77±20.88cm3 para 75.97±26.62cm3). Em relação à ascularização uterina, notamos incremento dos IP das artérias uterinas em ambos os grupos (grupo SIU-LNG: artéria uterina direita de 2.38±0.72 para 2.76±0.99 (média ±SD) e artéria uterina esquerda 2.46±0.70 para 2.87±0.96, e grupo GnRHa: artéria uterina direita 2.04±0.59 para 3.12±0.98 eartéria uterina esquerda 2.24±0.59 para 3.15±0.89). Em relação ao IR das artérias uterinas, observamos incremento no grupo GnRHa em ambas artérias e somente na artéria uterina esquerda no grupo SIU-LNG (grupoSIU-LNG - artéria uterina direita de 0.85±0.08 para 0.88±0.07 e artéria uterina esquerda de 0.86±0.07 para 0.89±0.06, e grupo GnRHa: artéria uterina direita de 0.81±0.07 para 0.93±0.09 e artéria uterina esquerda 0.84±0.06 para 0.93±0.09). No entanto, ao compararmos as diferenças, a elevação foi significativamente maior nas usuárias do GnRHa. Conclusões: Ambos GnRHa e SIU-LNG promoveram redução na espessura endometrial e aumento no IP das artérias uterinas. Houve redução do volume uterino nas usuárias do grupo GnRHa, não se alterando no grupo SIU-LNG. Em relação ao IR, houve incremento em ambas as artérias nas usuárias de GnRHa e somente na artéria uterina esquerda nas usuárias do SIU-LNG.Objectives:The objective of the present study was to compare the uterine arteries pulsatility index (PI) and resistence index (IR), uterine volume and endometrial thickness changes promoted by the use of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) and the gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa)in patients with endometriosis. Methods: Seventy nine women aged 18 to 40 years were included in this randomized controlled trial. Eighteen was excluded based on the exclusion criteria. The patients were randomly allocated in two groups: 31 women who used the LNG-IUD (since one became pregnant before insertion and wasexcluded) and 30 who used monthly GnRHa injections. They were submitted to a transvaginal two dimensional ultrasound scan on the day the treatment started and 6 months later, for the evaluation of uterine arteries PI, uterine arteries RI, uterine volume and endometrial thickness. Results: The use of LNG-IUD promoted an ndometrial thickness decrease (6.08±3.00mm to 2.7±0.98mm; mean±SD) as does the use of GnRHa (6.96±3.82mm to 3.23±2.32mm). The uterine volume decreased in the GnRHa group (86.67±28.38cm3to 55.27±25.52cm3), but not in the LNG-IUD group (75.77±20.88cm3 to 75.97±26.62cm3). Uterine arteries PI increased in both groups : Uterine arteries PI: LNG-IUD right uterine arterie 2.38 ± 0.72 to 2.76 ± 0.99 and left uterine arterie 2.46 ± 0.70 to 2.87 ± 0.96, and GnRHa right uterine arterie 2.04 ± 0.59 to 3.12 ± 0.98 and left uterine arterie 2.24±0.59 to 3.15 ± 0.89. Uterine arteries RI increased in both arteries in GnRHa and only in the left uterine arterie in the LNG-IUD :Uterine arteries RI : LNG-IUD right uterine arterie 0.85 ± 0..08 to 0.88 ± 0.07 and left uterine arterie 0.86 ± 0.07 to 0.89 ± 0.06, and GnRHa right uterine arterie 0.81 ± 0.07 to 0.93 ± 0.09 and left uterine arterie 0.84 ± 0.06 to 0.93 ± 0.09 . However, the increase was significant higher in the GnRHa group. Conclusions: Both GnRHa and LNG-IUD promoted an endometrial thickness decrease and an increase in the uterine arteries PI. The uterine volume decreased in women who used GnRHa, but not in those who used LNG-IUD

The effect of System Intrauterine levonorgestrel (LNG-IUS) in the uterine artery flow, volume uterinoe Endometrial thickness in patients with endometriosis Pelvic: comparative study with the GnRH analogue (GnRHa)

Objetivos: O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar os índices de Pulsatilidade (IP) e Resistência (IR) das artérias uterinas, o volume uterino e a espessura endometrial após o uso do Sistema Intra-uterino de Levonorgestrel (SIU-LNG) ou do agonista do GnRHa (GnRHa) em pacientes portadoras de endometriose pélvica. Pacientes e métodos: Setenta e nove mulheres voluntárias, com idade entre 18 e 40 anos, foram incluídas neste ensaio clínico comparativo, prospectivo, randomizado e controlado. Dezoito foram eliminadas do estudo baseadas nos critérios de exclusão, As 61 pacientes remanescentes foram divididas em dois grupos: 31 pacientes fizeram parte do grupo SIU-LNG (uma foi excluída antes da inserção por apresentar-se grávida) e 30 fizeram parte do grupo GnRHa. Foram submetidasa exame ultra-sonográfico transvaginal bidimensional no dia em que iniciaram o tratamento (inserção do SIU-LNG ou administração de uma ampola de 3,75 mg de GnRHa por via intra-muscular) e seis meses após, avaliando a espessura endometrial, o volume uterino e os IR e IP das artérias uterinas. Resultados: Ambos tratamentos promoveram redução da espessura endometrial (6.08±3.00mm para 2.70±0.98mm e 6.96±3.82mm para 3.23±2.32mm - média ±SD, grupo SIU-LNG e grupo GnRHa, respectivamente). O volume uterino teve redução no grupo usuário do GnRHa (86.67±28.38cm3 para 55.27±25.52cm3) sem alteração significativa nas usuárias do SIU-LNG (75.77±20.88cm3 para 75.97±26.62cm3). Em relação à ascularização uterina, notamos incremento dos IP das artérias uterinas em ambos os grupos (grupo SIU-LNG: artéria uterina direita de 2.38±0.72 para 2.76±0.99 (média ±SD) e artéria uterina esquerda 2.46±0.70 para 2.87±0.96, e grupo GnRHa: artéria uterina direita 2.04±0.59 para 3.12±0.98 eartéria uterina esquerda 2.24±0.59 para 3.15±0.89). Em relação ao IR das artérias uterinas, observamos incremento no grupo GnRHa em ambas artérias e somente na artéria uterina esquerda no grupo SIU-LNG (grupoSIU-LNG - artéria uterina direita de 0.85±0.08 para 0.88±0.07 e artéria uterina esquerda de 0.86±0.07 para 0.89±0.06, e grupo GnRHa: artéria uterina direita de 0.81±0.07 para 0.93±0.09 e artéria uterina esquerda 0.84±0.06 para 0.93±0.09). No entanto, ao compararmos as diferenças, a elevação foi significativamente maior nas usuárias do GnRHa. Conclusões: Ambos GnRHa e SIU-LNG promoveram redução na espessura endometrial e aumento no IP das artérias uterinas. Houve redução do volume uterino nas usuárias do grupo GnRHa, não se alterando no grupo SIU-LNG. Em relação ao IR, houve incremento em ambas as artérias nas usuárias de GnRHa e somente na artéria uterina esquerda nas usuárias do SIU-LNG.Objectives:The objective of the present study was to compare the uterine arteries pulsatility index (PI) and resistence index (IR), uterine volume and endometrial thickness changes promoted by the use of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) and the gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa)in patients with endometriosis. Methods: Seventy nine women aged 18 to 40 years were included in this randomized controlled trial. Eighteen was excluded based on the exclusion criteria. The patients were randomly allocated in two groups: 31 women who used the LNG-IUD (since one became pregnant before insertion and wasexcluded) and 30 who used monthly GnRHa injections. They were submitted to a transvaginal two dimensional ultrasound scan on the day the treatment started and 6 months later, for the evaluation of uterine arteries PI, uterine arteries RI, uterine volume and endometrial thickness. Results: The use of LNG-IUD promoted an ndometrial thickness decrease (6.08±3.00mm to 2.7±0.98mm; mean±SD) as does the use of GnRHa (6.96±3.82mm to 3.23±2.32mm). The uterine volume decreased in the GnRHa group (86.67±28.38cm3to 55.27±25.52cm3), but not in the LNG-IUD group (75.77±20.88cm3 to 75.97±26.62cm3). Uterine arteries PI increased in both groups : Uterine arteries PI: LNG-IUD right uterine arterie 2.38 ± 0.72 to 2.76 ± 0.99 and left uterine arterie 2.46 ± 0.70 to 2.87 ± 0.96, and GnRHa right uterine arterie 2.04 ± 0.59 to 3.12 ± 0.98 and left uterine arterie 2.24±0.59 to 3.15 ± 0.89. Uterine arteries RI increased in both arteries in GnRHa and only in the left uterine arterie in the LNG-IUD :Uterine arteries RI : LNG-IUD right uterine arterie 0.85 ± 0..08 to 0.88 ± 0.07 and left uterine arterie 0.86 ± 0.07 to 0.89 ± 0.06, and GnRHa right uterine arterie 0.81 ± 0.07 to 0.93 ± 0.09 and left uterine arterie 0.84 ± 0.06 to 0.93 ± 0.09 . However, the increase was significant higher in the GnRHa group. Conclusions: Both GnRHa and LNG-IUD promoted an endometrial thickness decrease and an increase in the uterine arteries PI. The uterine volume decreased in women who used GnRHa, but not in those who used LNG-IUD

UTERINE ULTRASONOGRAPHIC CHANGES DURING ENDOMETRIOSIS TREATMENT: A COMPARISON BETWEEN LEVONORGESTREL-RELEASING INTRAUTERINE DEVICES AND A GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING HORMONE AGONIST

We compared the effects of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices (LNG-IUD) and a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) on uterine volume, uterine arteries pulsatility index (PI) and endometrial thickness before and after six months of endometriosis treatment. Sixty women aged 18-40 y were allocated randomly to one of two groups: LNG-IUDs were inserted in 30 women, and GnRHa monthly injections were performed on the other 30. All 60 women were submitted to transvaginal 2-D ultrasound scans on the day that the treatment started and then six months later. Measurements of uterine arteries PI, uterine volume and endometrial thickness were performed at both evaluations. The use of LNG-IUDs significantly decreased endometrial thickness (pre = 6.08 +/- 3.00 mm, post = 2.7 +/- 0.98 mm; mean +/- SD), as did the use of GnRHa (pre = 6.96 +/- 3.82 mm, post = 3.23 +/- 2.32 mm). The uterine volume decreased in the GnRHa group (pre = 86.67 +/- 28.38 cm(3), Post = 55.27 +/- 25.52 cm(3)), but not in the LNG-IUD group (pre = 75.77 +/- 20.88 cm(3), post = 75.97 +/- 26.62 cm(3)). Uterine arteries PI increased for both groups; however, the increase was higher in the GnRHa group (0.99 +/- 0.84 vs. 0.38 +/- 0.84, p = 0.007; PI increase in GnRHa and in LNG-IUD groups, respectively). In conclusion, levonorgestrel released directly onto the endometrium by the LNG-IUD induced smaller uterine changes than did the hypoestrogenism induced by GnRHa. Nevertheless, both promoted similar effects on endometrial thickness. (E-mail: [email protected]) (C) 2008 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

UTERINE ULTRASONOGRAPHIC CHANGES DURING ENDOMETRIOSIS TREATMENT: A COMPARISON BETWEEN LEVONORGESTREL-RELEASING INTRAUTERINE DEVICES AND A GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING HORMONE AGONIST

We compared the effects of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices (LNG-IUD) and a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) on uterine volume, uterine arteries pulsatility index (PI) and endometrial thickness before and after six months of endometriosis treatment. Sixty women aged 18-40 y were allocated randomly to one of two groups: LNG-IUDs were inserted in 30 women, and GnRHa monthly injections were performed on the other 30. All 60 women were submitted to transvaginal 2-D ultrasound scans on the day that the treatment started and then six months later. Measurements of uterine arteries PI, uterine volume and endometrial thickness were performed at both evaluations. The use of LNG-IUDs significantly decreased endometrial thickness (pre = 6.08 +/- 3.00 mm, post = 2.7 +/- 0.98 mm; mean +/- SD), as did the use of GnRHa (pre = 6.96 +/- 3.82 mm, post = 3.23 +/- 2.32 mm). The uterine volume decreased in the GnRHa group (pre = 86.67 +/- 28.38 cm(3), Post = 55.27 +/- 25.52 cm(3)), but not in the LNG-IUD group (pre = 75.77 +/- 20.88 cm(3), post = 75.97 +/- 26.62 cm(3)). Uterine arteries PI increased for both groups; however, the increase was higher in the GnRHa group (0.99 +/- 0.84 vs. 0.38 +/- 0.84, p = 0.007; PI increase in GnRHa and in LNG-IUD groups, respectively). In conclusion, levonorgestrel released directly onto the endometrium by the LNG-IUD induced smaller uterine changes than did the hypoestrogenism induced by GnRHa. Nevertheless, both promoted similar effects on endometrial thickness. (E-mail: [email protected]) (C) 2008 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology