3 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Doubling your payoff: winning pain relief engages endogenous pain inhibition
When in pain, pain relief is much sought after, particularly for individuals with chronic pain. In analogy to
augmentation of the hedonic experience (“liking”) of a reward by the motivation to obtain a reward (“wanting”), the
seeking of pain relief in a motivated state might increase the experience of pain relief when obtained. We tested
this hypothesis in a psychophysical experiment in healthy human subjects, by assessing potential pain-inhibitory
effects of pain relief “won” in a wheel of fortune game compared with pain relief without winning, exploiting the
fact that the mere chance of winning induces a motivated state. The results show pain-inhibitory effects of pain
relief obtained by winning in behaviorally assessed pain perception and ratings of pain intensity. Further, the
higher participants scored on the personality trait novelty seeking, the more pain inhibition was induced. These
results provide evidence that pain relief, when obtained in a motivated state, engages endogenous pain-inhibitory
systems beyond the pain reduction that underlies the relief in the first place. Consequently, such pain relief might
be used to improve behavioral pain therapy, inducing a positive, perhaps self-amplifying feedback loop of
reduced pain and improved functionality
Social norms related to combining drugs and sex ("chemsex") among gay men in South London.
BACKGROUND: 'Chemsex' refers to the combining of sex and illicit drugs, typically mephedrone, GHB/GBL, and crystal methamphetamine. While numerous studies have examined the role of illicit drugs in sexual risk taking, less attention has been paid to the broader social context and structures of their use among gay men. Given their established role in influencing health related behaviour, this study sought to examine the nature and operation of social norms relating to chemsex among gay men residing in South London. METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted with thirty self-identifying gay men (age range 21-53) who lived in three South London boroughs, and who had used either crystal methamphetamine, mephedrone or GHB/GBL either immediately before or during sex with another man during the previous 12 months. Data were subjected to a thematic analysis. In addition, two focus groups (n=12) were conducted with gay men from the community to explore group-level perceptions of drug use and chemsex. RESULTS: Chemsex was perceived as ubiquitous amongst gay men by a majority of participants, who additionally described a variety of ways it is arranged (including mobile apps) and a variety of settings in which it occurs (including commercial and private settings). Chemsex was associated with unique sexual permissions and expectations, although participants also described having personal boundaries with respect to certain drug and sex practices, suggesting within-group stigmatisation. CONCLUSION: This study clearly documents exaggerated beliefs about the ubiquity of chemsex, shifts in the perceived normativity of certain settings and means to facilitate chemsex, and attitudes revealing stigma against certain types of chemsex and men who engage in it. There is a need for health promotion interventions to challenge social norms relating to drug use generally, and chemsex specifically, and for such interventions to make use of the online settings in which chemsex is often facilitated