Learning how to make the right decision fast.

We all make judgements and decisions every day about what to wear, eat or do. The decisions affect us and the people close to us, while the judgements and decisions in our professional nursing lives have implications for patients and service users

Patient expectations of pressure ulcer prevention in the NHS, healthcare demands and national policy : a critical commentary

Preventive care was recently identified as a Government priority, which is likely to affect pressure ulcer (PU) preventive care in the NHS. Contemporary economic analyses of PU prevention interventions are undermined by factors including methodological challenges and poor inter-rater reliability of PU risk assessment tools. Healthcare demands on the NHS created by PU prevention remain unclear, although the burden is high, with litigation costs rising continuously. The poorly understood economics of PU prevention may create variation in practice. Patient expectations of PU prevention may be influenced by mainstream media, national awareness campaigns and the varied information and advice offered by professionals. Patient expectations and low levels of functional health literacy may create confusion and unrealistic expectations. This article critically examines the impact of recent changes in Government priorities related to PU prevention, considering the effects of healthcare demand, economics and patient expectations

A randomised controlled trial of compression therapies for the treatment of venous leg ulcers (VenUS 6) : study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group, three arm randomised controlled trial

Background Venous leg ulcer(s), are common, recurring, open wounds on the lower leg, resulting from diseased or damaged leg veins impairing blood flow. Wound healing is the primary treatment aim for venous leg ulceration, alongside management of pain, wound exudate and infection. Full (high) compression therapy delivering 40mmHg of pressure at the ankle is the recommended first line treatment for venous leg ulcers. There are several different forms of compression therapy available including wraps, two-layer hosiery, and two-layer or four-layer bandages. There is good evidence for the clinical and cost effectiveness of four-layer bandage and two-layer hosiery but more limited evidence for other treatments (two-layer bandage and compression wraps). Robust evidence is required to compare clinical and cost effectiveness of these and to investigate which is the best compression treatment for reducing time to healing of venous leg ulcers whilst offering value for money. VenUS 6 will therefore investigate the clinical and cost effectiveness of evidence-based compression, two-layer bandage and compression wraps for time to healing of venous leg ulcers. Methods VenUS 6 is a pragmatic, multi-centre, three arm, parallel group, randomised controlled trial. Adult patients with a venous leg ulcer will be randomised to receive 1) compression wraps, 2) two-layer bandage or 3) evidence-based compression (two-layer hosiery or four-layer bandage). Participants will followed up for between 4 and 12 months. The primary outcome will be time to healing (full epithelial cover in absence of a scab) in days since randomisation. Secondary outcomes will include key clinical events (e.g., healing of the reference leg; ulcer recurrence; ulcer/skin deterioration, amputation, admission/discharge, surgery to close/remove incompetent superficial veins, infection, or death), treatment changes, adherence and ease of use, ulcer related pain, health-related quality of life and resource use. Discussion VenUS 6 will provide robust evidence on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the different forms of compression therapies for venous leg ulceration. VenUS 6 opened to recruitment in January 2021 and is currently recruiting across 30 participating centres. Clinical Trial Registry: ISRCTN 67321719 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN67321719). Prospectively Registered: 14.09.202

Intraperitoneal drain placement and outcomes after elective colorectal surgery: international matched, prospective, cohort study

Despite current guidelines, intraperitoneal drain placement after elective colorectal surgery remains widespread. Drains were not associated with earlier detection of intraperitoneal collections, but were associated with prolonged hospital stay and increased risk of surgical-site infections.Background Many surgeons routinely place intraperitoneal drains after elective colorectal surgery. However, enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines recommend against their routine use owing to a lack of clear clinical benefit. This study aimed to describe international variation in intraperitoneal drain placement and the safety of this practice. Methods COMPASS (COMPlicAted intra-abdominal collectionS after colorectal Surgery) was a prospective, international, cohort study which enrolled consecutive adults undergoing elective colorectal surgery (February to March 2020). The primary outcome was the rate of intraperitoneal drain placement. Secondary outcomes included: rate and time to diagnosis of postoperative intraperitoneal collections; rate of surgical site infections (SSIs); time to discharge; and 30-day major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade at least III). After propensity score matching, multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to estimate the independent association of the secondary outcomes with drain placement. Results Overall, 1805 patients from 22 countries were included (798 women, 44.2 per cent; median age 67.0 years). The drain insertion rate was 51.9 per cent (937 patients). After matching, drains were not associated with reduced rates (odds ratio (OR) 1.33, 95 per cent c.i. 0.79 to 2.23; P = 0.287) or earlier detection (hazard ratio (HR) 0.87, 0.33 to 2.31; P = 0.780) of collections. Although not associated with worse major postoperative complications (OR 1.09, 0.68 to 1.75; P = 0.709), drains were associated with delayed hospital discharge (HR 0.58, 0.52 to 0.66; P < 0.001) and an increased risk of SSIs (OR 2.47, 1.50 to 4.05; P < 0.001). Conclusion Intraperitoneal drain placement after elective colorectal surgery is not associated with earlier detection of postoperative collections, but prolongs hospital stay and increases SSI risk

Legs Matter: improving wound care of the lower limb

Lower limb ulceration is a common, debilitating and costly condition that accounts for over one third of chronic wounds in the UK. The most common underlying causes of leg and foot ulceration are venous insufficiency, arterial insufficiency, lymphoedema and diabetic neuropathy. More than half of leg ulcers do not have a recorded diagnosis and are unlikely to receive appropriate care. Poor care can cost up to ten times as much as appropriate care. The Legs Matter campaign aims to change this situation through a public health campaign supported by a website: http://legsmatter.org. The website provides clearly written, easily accessible information for patients, the public and generalist healthcare professionals along with signposts to reputable sources of information. In this way, the campaign aims to raise awareness that leg and foot conditions can be improved with the right care

Stockings or bandages for leg-ulcer compression?

Background: Four-layer bandaging is the standard treatment for venous leg ulcers but is bulky and can restrict mobility. Two-layer compression stockings have recently been marketed but their clinical and cost effectiveness were unknown. Aim: To compare the clinical and cost effectiveness of four-layer bandaging with two-layer compression stockings. Method: In a pragmatic, open, randomised controlled trial 454 participants were randomly allocated two-layer compression stockings or four-layer bandages and followed for up to 12 months after healing. Results: The median time to ulcer healing was almost identical (stockings group: 99 days, bandaging group: 98 days). More patients allocated stockings changed treatment but ulcer recurrence rates were higher in the bandaging group. Stockings cost £302 less per participant per year and had more than 95% probability of being the most cost-effective treatment. Conclusion: Two-layer compression stockings are a viable, cost-effective alternative to four-layer bandaging but may not be suitable for all patients

Active debridement of venous leg ulcers: a literature review to inform clinical practice

Community nurses often care for patients with sloughy venous leg ulcers. Slough is viewed as a potential infection source and an impediment to healing, but it is unclear if active debridement of slough promotes healing. Using a clinical scenario as a contextual basis, this literature review sought research evidence to answer this clinical question. A strategy based on the ‘4S’ approach was used to identify research evidence. The retrieved evidence included one systematic review, three clinical guidelines and six qualitative and quantitative studies. The analysis suggested that there is no robust evidence to support the routine practice of active debridement of venous leg ulcers to promote healing, and that debridement is associated with increased pain. Since autolytic debridement can be achieved through the application of graduated compression therapy, active debridement may offer no additional benefit

Venous Leg Ulcers

Leg ulcers usually occur secondary to venous reflux or obstruction, but 20% of people with leg ulcers have arterial disease, with or without venous disorders. Between 1.5 and 3.0 in 1000 people have active leg ulcers. Prevalence increases with age to about 20 in 1000 people aged over 80 years. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: We conducted a systematic overview, aiming to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of treatments for venous leg ulcers? What are the effects of organisational interventions for venous leg ulcers? What are the effects of advice about self-help interventions in people receiving usual care for venous leg ulcers? What are the effects of interventions to prevent recurrence of venous leg ulcers? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to March 2014 (BMJ Clinical Evidence overviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this overview). RESULTS: At this update, searching of electronic databases retrieved 116 studies. After deduplication and removal of conference abstracts, 63 records were screened for inclusion in the overview. Appraisal of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 43 studies and the further review of 20 full publications. Of the 20 full articles evaluated, four systematic reviews were updated and four RCTs were added at this update. We performed a GRADE evaluation for 23 PICO combinations. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic overview, we categorised the efficacy for 13 interventions based on information about the effectiveness and safety of advice to elevate leg, advice to keep leg active, compression stockings for prevention of recurrence, compression bandages and stockings to treat venous leg ulcers, laser treatment (low level), leg ulcer clinics, pentoxifylline, skin grafting, superficial vein surgery for prevention of recurrence, superficial vein surgery to treat venous leg ulcers, therapeutic ultrasound, and topical negative pressure

Reducing unwarranted variation in chronic wound care

The annual cost to the NHS for managing the 2.2 million wounds and their associated comorbidities is estimated to be between £4.5 billion and £5.1 billion. Improving the quality of wound care should reduce healthcare spending and improve patients' quality of life. The new NHS England wound care management project, which is part of the Leading Change, Adding Value nursing and midwifery framework, seeks to reduce unwarranted variation in the assessment and treatment of wounds across the patient pathway by developing a number of wound-focussed initiatives. This article introduces the project and outlines the development of an evidence-based wound assessment minimum data set that will be monitored by a wound assessment Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) indicator. This initiative demonstrates the need for good quality economic data to identify clinical issues of concern that can then be addressed by appropriate policy initiatives to improve patient care and make the best possible use of NHS resources