Polyarteritis nodosa presenting with catastrophic involvement of the intra-abdominal arterial tree

We report a case of a 63-year-old female presenting with abdominal pain, who suffered a dramatic deterioration in her condition following a diagnosis of bilateral renal infarcts on imaging. Within days she had developed widespread aneurysmal dilatation, dissection and thrombosis of the intra-abdominal arterial tree, requiring emergency transfer to a tertiary vascular centre for treatment of polyarteritis nodosa. She responded well to intravenous cyclophosphamide and is now receiving treatment on an outpatient basis.</p

Polyarteritis nodosa presenting with catastrophic involvement of the intra-abdominal arterial tree

We report a case of a 63-year-old female presenting with abdominal pain, who suffered a dramatic deterioration in her condition following a diagnosis of bilateral renal infarcts on imaging. Within days she had developed widespread aneurysmal dilatation, dissection and thrombosis of the intra-abdominal arterial tree, requiring emergency transfer to a tertiary vascular centre for treatment of polyarteritis nodosa. She responded well to intravenous cyclophosphamide and is now receiving treatment on an outpatient basis.</jats:p

Exercise and Cognitive Function in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Harms

Key Points Cognitive impairment is common in CKD. Exercise targets multiple risk factors of cognitive decline.Meta-analysis found that exercise had a small but positive effect on cognitive function in CKD, albeit the quality of evidence was low.Further analyses revealed that aerobic exercise was particularly beneficial and that exercise did not substantially increase harms. Background People living with CKD are at higher risk of cognitive impairment. Exercise may improve cognitive function. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was completed to determine the efficacy and harms of exercise in improving cognitive function in people living with CKD. Methods A systematic literature review identified randomized controlled trials of people with any stage of CKD, with an intervention that exercised large-muscle groups, and with a validated outcome measure of cognitive function. First, harms were analyzed. Then a random-effects meta-analysis was completed with subsequent planned subgroup analyses to investigate heterogeneity between CKD stages and treatments; between different exercise types, durations, and intensities; and between different outcome methodologies. Finally, quality of evidence was rated. Results Nineteen trials randomized 1160 participants. Harms were reported on 94 occasions in intervention groups versus 83 in control. The primary analysis found that exercise had a small but statistically significant effect on cognition in CKD (effect size=0.22; 95% confidence intervals, 0.00 to 0.44; P = 0.05). However, the quality of evidence was rated as low. Subgroup analyses found that type of exercise moderated the effect on cognition (chi square=7.62; P = 0.02), with positive effects only observed following aerobic exercise (effect size=0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.21 to 0.93; P = 0.002). Conclusions Across the spectrum of CKD, exercise had a small but positive and clinically meaningful effect on cognitive function and did not seem to be harmful. Aerobic exercise was particularly beneficial. However, the results must be interpreted cautiously because of the low quality of evidence. Nevertheless, care teams may choose to recommend aerobic exercise interventions to prevent cognitive decline. Researchers should design unbiased studies to clarify what intensity and duration of exercise is required to maximize efficiency of such exercise interventions

Prophylaxis for renal patients at risk of COVID-19 infection: results from the intranasal niclosamide randomised, double blinded, placebo controlled arm of the PROTECT-V platform trial

Purpose Despite vaccination, many patients remain vulnerable to COVID-19 infection and poorer outcomes, because of underlying health conditions resulting in sub-optimal vaccine responses. This study aims to demonstrate whether intranasal niclosamide confers additional protection against COVID-19 infection above standard preventative measures including vaccination. Methods PROTECT-V (PROphylaxis for paTiEnts at risk of COVID-19 infecTion) is a platform trial testing multiple pre-exposure COVID-19 prophylactic agents in vulnerable patients. This paper reports results from the randomised, double blind, placebo controlled intranasal niclosamide arm. 1651 adult patients on dialysis, with a kidney transplant or renal autoimmune conditions on immunosuppression were randomised from 48 sites (37 UK; 11 Indian). Intranasal niclosamide or matched placebo was administered twice daily, for up to nine months. Primary outcome was time to symptomatic COVID-19 infection. Results 1651 patients were randomised (826 niclosamide;825 placebo) between February 2021 to November 2022. 655(39.7%) were dialysis patients, 622(37.7%) kidney transplant recipients and 374(22.7%) had renal autoimmune disease. 97.5% patients in the UK and 66.4% patients in India with comparable proportions in both treatment groups had received COVID-19 vaccinations. Despite no adverse safety signal, there was a high withdrawal rate (40% niclosamide;23.8% placebo) due to local upper airway irritation leading to a significantly shorter treatment duration in the niclosamide group). Symptomatic COVID-19 infection during study treatment was observed in 103 patients in the niclosamide group and 133 in the placebo group (estimated hazard ratio 1.02(95%CI 0.79–1.32)). Conclusion Intranasal niclosamide did not reduce risk of symptomatic COVID-19 infection in this cohort compared to placebo. Trial Registration This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04870333 (submitted 01/03/2021; posted 03/05/2021), EudraCT: 2020–004144-28 and the Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI):#CTRI/2022/03/040802

Description and Cross-Sectional Analyses of 25,880 Adults and Children in the UK National Registry of Rare Kidney Diseases Cohort

Introduction: The National Registry of Rare Kidney Diseases (RaDaR) collects data from people living with rare kidney diseases across the UK, and is the world’s largest, rare kidney disease registry. We present the clinical demographics and renal function of 25,880 prevalent patients and sought evidence of bias in recruitment to RaDaR. Methods: RaDaR is linked with the UK Renal Registry (UKRR, with which all UK patients receiving kidney replacement therapy [KRT] are registered). We assessed ethnicity and socioeconomic status in the following: (i) prevalent RaDaR patients receiving KRT compared with patients with eligible rare disease diagnoses receiving KRT in the UKRR, (ii) patients recruited to RaDaR compared with all eligible unrecruited patients at 2 renal centers, and (iii) the age-stratified ethnicity distribution of RaDaR patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) was compared to that of the English census. Results: We found evidence of disparities in ethnicity and social deprivation in recruitment to RaDaR; however, these were not consistent across comparisons. Compared with either adults recruited to RaDaR or the English population, children recruited to RaDaR were more likely to be of Asian ethnicity (17.3% vs. 7.5%, P-value < 0.0001) and live in more socially deprived areas (30.3% vs. 17.3% in the most deprived Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) quintile, P-value < 0.0001). Conclusion: We observed no evidence of systematic biases in recruitment of patients into RaDaR; however, the data provide empirical evidence of negative economic and social consequences (across all ethnicities) experienced by families with children affected by rare kidney diseases

Description and Cross-Sectional Analyses of 25,880 Adults and Children in the UK National Registry of Rare Kidney Diseases Cohort

Introduction: The National Registry of Rare Kidney Diseases (RaDaR) collects data from people living with rare kidney diseases across the UK, and is the world's largest, rare kidney disease registry. We present the clinical demographics and renal function of 25,880 prevalent patients and sought evidence of bias in recruitment to RaDaR. Methods: RaDaR is linked with the UK Renal Registry (UKRR, with which all UK patients receiving kidney replacement therapy [KRT] are registered). We assessed ethnicity and socioeconomic status in the following: (i) prevalent RaDaR patients receiving KRT compared with patients with eligible rare disease diagnoses receiving KRT in the UKRR, (ii) patients recruited to RaDaR compared with all eligible unrecruited patients at 2 renal centers, and (iii) the age-stratified ethnicity distribution of RaDaR patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) was compared to that of the English census. Results: We found evidence of disparities in ethnicity and social deprivation in recruitment to RaDaR; however, these were not consistent across comparisons. Compared with either adults recruited to RaDaR or the English population, children recruited to RaDaR were more likely to be of Asian ethnicity (17.3% vs. 7.5%, P-value < 0.0001) and live in more socially deprived areas (30.3% vs. 17.3% in the most deprived Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) quintile, P-value < 0.0001). Conclusion: We observed no evidence of systematic biases in recruitment of patients into RaDaR; however, the data provide empirical evidence of negative economic and social consequences (across all ethnicities) experienced by families with children affected by rare kidney diseases

Effects of rare kidney diseases on kidney failure: a longitudinal analysis of the UK National Registry of Rare Kidney Diseases (RaDaR) cohort

Individuals with rare kidney diseases account for 5-10% of people with chronic kidney disease, but constitute more than 25% of patients receiving kidney replacement therapy. The National Registry of Rare Kidney Diseases (RaDaR) gathers longitudinal data from patients with these conditions, which we used to study disease progression and outcomes of death and kidney failure.People aged 0-96 years living with 28 types of rare kidney diseases were recruited from 108 UK renal care facilities. The primary outcomes were cumulative incidence of mortality and kidney failure in individuals with rare kidney diseases, which were calculated and compared with that of unselected patients with chronic kidney disease. Cumulative incidence and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated for the following outcomes: median age at kidney failure; median age at death; time from start of dialysis to death; and time from diagnosis to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) thresholds, allowing calculation of time from last eGFR of 75 mL/min per 1·73 m2 or more to first eGFR of less than 30 mL/min per 1·73 m2 (the therapeutic trial window).Between Jan 18, 2010, and July 25, 2022, 27 285 participants were recruited to RaDaR. Median follow-up time from diagnosis was 9·6 years (IQR 5·9-16·7). RaDaR participants had significantly higher 5-year cumulative incidence of kidney failure than 2·81 million UK patients with all-cause chronic kidney disease (28% vs 1%; p Background Methods Findings Interpretation Funding</p

Effects of rare kidney diseases on kidney failure: a longitudinal analysis of the UK National Registry of Rare Kidney Diseases (RaDaR) cohort

Individuals with rare kidney diseases account for 5-10% of people with chronic kidney disease, but constitute more than 25% of patients receiving kidney replacement therapy. The National Registry of Rare Kidney Diseases (RaDaR) gathers longitudinal data from patients with these conditions, which we used to study disease progression and outcomes of death and kidney failure.People aged 0-96 years living with 28 types of rare kidney diseases were recruited from 108 UK renal care facilities. The primary outcomes were cumulative incidence of mortality and kidney failure in individuals with rare kidney diseases, which were calculated and compared with that of unselected patients with chronic kidney disease. Cumulative incidence and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated for the following outcomes: median age at kidney failure; median age at death; time from start of dialysis to death; and time from diagnosis to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) thresholds, allowing calculation of time from last eGFR of 75 mL/min per 1·73 m2 or more to first eGFR of less than 30 mL/min per 1·73 m2 (the therapeutic trial window).Between Jan 18, 2010, and July 25, 2022, 27 285 participants were recruited to RaDaR. Median follow-up time from diagnosis was 9·6 years (IQR 5·9-16·7). RaDaR participants had significantly higher 5-year cumulative incidence of kidney failure than 2·81 million UK patients with all-cause chronic kidney disease (28% vs 1%; p Background Methods Findings Interpretation Funding</p