Creating Summative Assessments that Align to Student Learning Outcomes

Do your exams, research papers, or other major assignments fully assess desired course-level student learning outcomes? Would you like to put your students in a better position to both develop key skills and demonstrate what they’ve learned through your course? Through this workshop, we will explore different summative assessment methods, and you will develop or refine a high stakes summative assessment that directly aligns with one or more of your course-level student learning outcomes. Please come with a course in mind, particular outcome(s) that you plan to assess, or a current summative assessment that you would like to revise

High Stakes: Creating Summative Assessments that Align to Student Learning Outcomes

Do your exams, research papers, or other major assignments fully assess desired course-level student learning outcomes? Would you like to put your students in a better position to both develop key skills and demonstrate what they’ve learned through your course? Through this workshop, we will explore different summative assessment methods, and you will develop or refine a high stakes summative assessment that directly aligns with one or more of your course-level student learning outcomes. Please come with a course in mind, particular outcome(s) that you plan to assess, or a current summative assessment that you would like to revise

Working Session to Align Learning Outcomes, Class Assignments, and Final Assessments

Ready to improve course assignments you’ve already created? Join us for a two-hour working session where you will evaluate and revise your existing course assignments using your course learning outcomes and best practices provided by the session facilitators. This session is structured to have plenty of time for discussion and feedback. You’ll leave this session with revised assignments that are better aligned with your course-level outcomes and assessment best practices. To maximize the effectiveness of this working session, please bring: 1) a summative assignment (for example, a final exam or term project); 2) a formative assignment (for example, a homework assignment or in-class exercise) related to the summative assignment you brought; and 3) the learning outcomes that these assignments address. The more participants we have, the more valuable the experience will be for all involved, so if you’re unsure of whether or not you should attend – please do

Low Stakes, No Stakes: Formative Classroom Assessment Techniques

Are you looking for more interactive ways to help students develop a particular skill? Would you like to create a low-risk environment for students that will help you (and them) gauge their understanding of key concepts? Through this workshop, you will develop low-stakes or no-stakes simple assessment techniques, assignments, or activities to use in your own class this semester. Please come with a course in mind, or a particular lesson or lecture where you would like to engage students in developing or refining a particular skill

Medical Student Professionalism Narratives: A Thematic Analysis and Interdisciplinary Comparative Investigation

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Professionalism development is influenced by the informal and hidden curriculum. The primary objective of this study was to better understand this experiential learning in the setting of the Emergency Department (ED). Secondarily, the study aimed to explore differences in the informal curriculum between Emergency Medicine (EM) and Internal Medicine (IM) clerkships.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A thematic analysis was conducted on 377 professionalism narratives from medical students completing a required EM clerkship from July 2008 through May 2010. The narratives were analyzed using established thematic categories from prior research as well as basic descriptive characteristics. Chi-square analysis was used to compare the frequency of thematic categories to prior research in IM. Finally, emerging themes not fully appreciated in the established thematic categories were created using grounded theory.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Observations involving interactions between attending physician and patient were most abundant. The narratives were coded as positive 198 times, negative 128 times, and hybrid 37 times. The two most abundant narrative themes involved <it>manifesting respect </it>(36.9%) and <it>spending time </it>(23.7%). Both of these themes were statistically more likely to be noted by students on EM clerkships compared to IM clerkships. Finally, one new theme regarding <it>cynicism </it>emerged during analysis.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This analysis describes an informal curriculum that is diverse in themes. Student narratives suggest their clinical experiences to be influential on professionalism development. Medical students focus on different aspects of professionalism depending on clerkship specialty.</p

Webinar: Techie Teaching Tools Panel: Peardeck, PackBack, and Plickers

Join a panel of UNC faculty who will discuss different technologies they are using to enhance student learning - Peardeck, Packback, and Plickers! Learn how these tools can support interactive lectures, improve student discussions and writing, and help you take attendance and conduct formative assessment in a socially distanced classroom. ASL interpretation on scree