Motion-detection thresholds for first- and second-order gratings and plaids

AbstractThe two-stage decomposition–recombination model of 2D motion perception has been criticised on the basis that the direction of plaid stimuli can be accurately discriminated at speeds so low that the direction of their Fourier components is not discriminable. The nature of this gap in performance between gratings and plaids was investigated across a range of spatial frequencies and durations for first- and second-order stimuli. Motion-detection thresholds were obtained using a 2AFC, constant stimuli procedure and it was found that although thresholds for detection of plaid motion were often lower than those for gratings, the gap in performance between first-order plaids and gratings was unreliable, varying in magnitude and occasionally direction with the spatial frequency of the stimulus, presentation duration and observer. Curiously, an analogous gap found between purely second-order gratings and second-order plaids was more reliable and stable. It has been suggested that the gap is the result of ‘local motion detectors’ or broadly tuned V1 cells. The data presented here suggest that second-order mechanisms are responsible for the gap and that first-order information may even disrupt it

Vi har forlatt redaksjonsrådet i Publications

Source at https://khrono.no/.Undertegnede har en stund vært medlemmer av redaksjonsrådet («Editorial Board») i MDPI-tidsskriftet Publications. I forrige uke gikk redaktøren, viseredaktøren og drøyt to tredjedeler av redaksjonsrådet av samtidig med oss, eller i nær tilknytning til at vi gikk av

Duration channels mediate human time perception

The task of deciding how long sensory events seem to last is one that the human nervous system appears to perform rapidly and, for sub-second intervals, seemingly without conscious effort. That these estimates can be performed within and between multiple sensory and motor domains suggest time perception forms one of the core, fundamental processes of our perception of the world around us. Given this significance, the current paucity in our understanding of how this process operates is surprising. One candidate mechanism for duration perception posits that duration may be mediated via a system of duration-selective ‘channels’, which are differentially activated depending on the match between afferent duration information and the channels' ‘preferred’ duration. However, this model awaits experimental validation. In the current study, we use the technique of sensory adaptation, and we present data that are well described by banks of duration channels that are limited in their bandwidth, sensory-specific, and appear to operate at a relatively early stage of visual and auditory sensory processing. Our results suggest that many of the computational principles the nervous system applies to coding visual spatial and auditory spectral information are common to its processing of temporal extent

Perceived time is spatial frequency dependent

YesWe investigated whether changes in low-level image characteristics, in this case spatial frequency, were capable of generating a well-known expansion in the perceived duration of an infrequent “oddball” stimulus relative to a repeatedly-presented “standard” stimulus. Our standard and oddball stimuli were Gabor patches that differed from each other in spatial frequency by two octaves. All stimuli were equated for visibility. Rather than the expected “subjective time expansion” found in previous studies, we obtained an equal and opposite expansion or contraction of perceived time dependent upon the spatial frequency relationship of the standard and oddball stimulus. Subsequent experiments using equi-visible stimuli reveal that mid-range spatial frequencies (ca. 2 c/deg) are consistently perceived as having longer durations than low (0.5 c/deg) or high (8 c/deg) spatial frequencies, despite having the same physical duration. Rather than forming a fixed proportion of baseline duration, this bias is constant in additive terms and implicates systematic variations in visual persistence across spatial frequency. Our results have implications for the widely cited finding that auditory stimuli are judged to be longer in duration than visual stimuli.Wellcome Trust, UK, the Federation of Ophthalmic and Dispensing Opticians, UK, and the College of Optometrists, UK

Development of radial optic flow pattern sensitivity at different speeds

AbstractThe development of sensitivity to radial optic flow discrimination was investigated by measuring motion coherence thresholds (MCTs) in school-aged children at two speeds. A total of 119 child observers aged 6–16years and 24 young adult observers (23.66+/−2.74years) participated. In a 2AFC task observers identified the direction of motion of a 5° radial (expanding vs. contracting) optic flow pattern containing 100 dots with 75% Michelson contrast moving at 1.6°/s and 5.5°/s and. The direction of each dot was drawn from a Gaussian distribution whose standard deviation was either low (similar directions) or high (different directions). Adult observers also identified the direction of motion for translational (rightward vs. leftward) and rotational (clockwise vs. anticlockwise) patterns. Motion coherence thresholds to radial optic flow improved gradually with age (linear regression, p<0.05), with different rates of development at the two speeds. Even at 16years MCTs were higher than that for adults (independent t-tests, p<0.05). Both children and adults had higher sensitivity at 5.5°/s compared to 1.6°/s (paired t-tests, p<0.05). Sensitivity to radial optic flow is still immature at 16years of age, indicating late maturation of higher cortical areas. Differences in sensitivity and rate of development of radial optic flow at the different speeds, suggest that different motion processing mechanisms are involved in processing slow and fast speeds

The contribution of local mechanisms to the visual perception of global motion

EThOS - Electronic Theses Online ServiceGBUnited Kingdo

Altmetrics: A Practical Guide for Librarians, Researchers and Academics

Book review of Altmetrics: A Practical Guide for Librarians, Researchers and Academics, by Andy Tattersall, ed. London: Facet Publishing, 2016. 224p. $95.00 (ISBN 978-1-78330-010-5).2, O

Altmetrics: A Practical Guide for Librarians, Researchers and Academics

Book review of Altmetrics: A Practical Guide for Librarians, Researchers and Academics, by Andy Tattersall, ed. London: Facet Publishing, 2016. 224p. $95.00 (ISBN 978-1-78330-010-5).2, O