14 research outputs found
Chief Minister’s Jan Awas Yojna-2015 – An Emerging Prospect Of Affordable Housing In Rajasthan
After independence, the country's urban population has exploded. The migration of people from rural and semi-urban areas to urban areas is a common occurrence. They face a significant shelter challenge in urban areas, which is out of reach due to scarce resources, expensive property, construction materials, and labour, as well as a general lack of infrastructure in urban areas. As a result, policymakers must take a constructive position in encouraging the development of EWS and LIG housing stock in urban areas. According to TG-12 reports, the poorer parts of India accounted for 96 percent of the housing shortage.3 As a result policy proposals were needed to close the gap between urban housing demand and supply. The Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojna-2015 (Urban) and the Chief Minister's Jan Awas Yojna-2015 (Rajasthan) will serve as a watershed moment in this regard. Central and state governments strategically manage the cost of affordable housing units for the EWS and LIG segments by subsidizing affordable houses and extending various incentives, exemptions, rebates, relaxations, interest subsidy, and facilities to various stakeholders with the aim of maximising the use of valuable urban lands to provide EWS and LIG houses at affordable rates to targeted groups. This research paper aims to evaluate the integration of both schemes in order to meet affordable housing goals in the state of Rajasthan, as well as summarise the perspectives of various stakeholders on both schemes
Fever clearance time – subgroup analyses.
<p>Heterogeneity was tested with a Cox regression model that included an interaction between treatment effect and subgroup.</p><p>MIC's and age were missing for some patients. N number, pts patients, MIC minimum inhibitory concentration.</p
Baseline characteristics of patients according to treatment group (intention to treat population).
<p>AST = serum aspartate aminotransferase (normal range 12–30 U/L), ALT = serum alanine aminotransferase (normal range 13–40 U/L).</p
Scatter plots of drugs MIC versus fever clearance time.
<p>Gatifloxacin and ofloxacin MICs versus fever clearance time by treatment group for patients with blood culture confirmed enteric fever. Blue lines correspond to LOESS scatter plot smoothers.</p
Treatment failure – subgroup analyses.
<p>Heterogeneity was tested with a Cox regression model that included an interaction between treatment effect and subgroup.</p>#<p>Based on Cox regression with Firth's penalized likelihood to cope with separation.</p><p>MIC's and age were missing for some patients. N number, pts patients, MIC minimum inhibitory concentration.</p
Minimum inhibitory concentration MIC of <i>Salmonella</i> Typhi and paratyphi A.
<p>132 <i>S</i>.Typhi and 86 <i>S</i>.Paratyphi A were available for MIC testing. MIC 50/90 = concentration at which 50% and 90% of the organisms, respectively, are inhibited. Comparison based on Fisher's exact test for categorical data and Wilcoxon test for continuous data.</p
Trial profile.
<p>Numbers in blue font represent numbers of patients infected with nalidixic acid resistant isolates.</p
Kaplan-Meier estimates for patients infected with nalidixic acid resistant isolates.
<p>Kaplan- Meier estimates of the probability of treatment failure, fever clearance time, and the probability of relapse for patients infected with nalidixic acid resistant isolates.</p