Notes on Recent Cases

Notes on recent cases by J. P. Guadnola, Kenneth Konop, William H. Konop, A. J. Barlow, J. H. Tuberty, Francis G. Fedder, and William Lee O\u27Malley

Binding of molecules to DNA and other semiflexible polymers

A theory is presented for the binding of small molecules such as surfactants to semiflexible polymers. The persistence length is assumed to be large compared to the monomer size but much smaller than the total chain length. Such polymers (e.g. DNA) represent an intermediate case between flexible polymers and stiff, rod-like ones, whose association with small molecules was previously studied. The chains are not flexible enough to actively participate in the self-assembly, yet their fluctuations induce long-range attractive interactions between bound molecules. In cases where the binding significantly affects the local chain stiffness, those interactions lead to a very sharp, cooperative association. This scenario is of relevance to the association of DNA with surfactants and compact proteins such as RecA. External tension exerted on the chain is found to significantly modify the binding by suppressing the fluctuation-induced interaction.Comment: 15 pages, 7 figures, RevTex, the published versio

How a Diverse Research Ecosystem Has Generated New Rehabilitation Technologies: Review of NIDILRR’s Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers

Over 50 million United States citizens (1 in 6 people in the US) have a developmental, acquired, or degenerative disability. The average US citizen can expect to live 20% of his or her life with a disability. Rehabilitation technologies play a major role in improving the quality of life for people with a disability, yet widespread and highly challenging needs remain. Within the US, a major effort aimed at the creation and evaluation of rehabilitation technology has been the Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers (RERCs) sponsored by the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research. As envisioned at their conception by a panel of the National Academy of Science in 1970, these centers were intended to take a “total approach to rehabilitation”, combining medicine, engineering, and related science, to improve the quality of life of individuals with a disability. Here, we review the scope, achievements, and ongoing projects of an unbiased sample of 19 currently active or recently terminated RERCs. Specifically, for each center, we briefly explain the needs it targets, summarize key historical advances, identify emerging innovations, and consider future directions. Our assessment from this review is that the RERC program indeed involves a multidisciplinary approach, with 36 professional fields involved, although 70% of research and development staff are in engineering fields, 23% in clinical fields, and only 7% in basic science fields; significantly, 11% of the professional staff have a disability related to their research. We observe that the RERC program has substantially diversified the scope of its work since the 1970’s, addressing more types of disabilities using more technologies, and, in particular, often now focusing on information technologies. RERC work also now often views users as integrated into an interdependent society through technologies that both people with and without disabilities co-use (such as the internet, wireless communication, and architecture). In addition, RERC research has evolved to view users as able at improving outcomes through learning, exercise, and plasticity (rather than being static), which can be optimally timed. We provide examples of rehabilitation technology innovation produced by the RERCs that illustrate this increasingly diversifying scope and evolving perspective. We conclude by discussing growth opportunities and possible future directions of the RERC program

Notes on Recent Cases

Notes on recent cases by J. P. Guadnola, Kenneth Konop, William H. Konop, A. J. Barlow, J. H. Tuberty, Francis G. Fedder, and William Lee O\u27Malley

Notes on Recent Cases

Notes on recent cases by J. P. Guadnola, Kenneth Konop, William H. Konop, A. J. Barlow, J. H. Tuberty, Francis G. Fedder, and William Lee O\u27Malley

Different Bioactive Neuropeptides are Expressed in Two Sub-Classes of GABAergic RME Nerve Ring Motorneurons in <i>Ascaris suum</i>

Neuropeptides can have significant effects on neurons and synapses, but among the ∼250 predicted peptides in nematodes, few have been characterized functionally. Here, we report new neuropeptides in the 4 RME nerve ring motorneurons of the nematode <i>Ascaris suum</i>. These GABAergic neurons are involved in three-dimensional head movement. Mass spectrometry (MS) of single dissected RMEs detected a total of 12 neuropeptides (encoded by five genes), nine of which are novel. None of these are expressed in the DI/VI inhibitory GABAergic motorneurons that synapse onto body wall muscle. Using peptide sequences obtained by tandem MS, we cloned the peptide-encoding transcripts and synthesized riboprobes for in situ hybridization (ISH). This complementary technique corroborated the results from single-cell MS, showing that the dissections were not contaminated with adhering tissue from other cells. We also synthesized a multiple antigenic peptide to raise a highly specific antibody against one of the endogenous peptides, which labeled the same cells detected by MS and ISH. Our results show that the RMEs can be divided into two subsets: RMED/V (expressing <i>afp-2</i>, <i>afp-15</i>, <i>Asu-nlp-58</i>, and high levels of <i>afp-16</i>) and RMEL/R (expressing <i>afp-15</i> and low levels of <i>afp-4</i> and <i>afp-16</i>). Almost all of these peptides are bioactive in <i>A. suum</i>