Cluster Analysis of Thermal Icequakes Using the Seismometer to Investigate Ice and Ocean Structure (SIIOS): Implications for Ocean World Seismology

Ocean Worlds are of high interest to the planetary community due to the potential habitability of their subsurface oceans. Over the next few decades several missions will be sent to ocean worlds including the Europa Clipper, Dragonfly, and possibly a Europa lander. The Dragonfly and Europa lander missions will carry seismic payloads tasked with detecting and locating seismic sources. The Seismometer to Investigate Ice and Ocean Structure (SIIOS) is a NASA PSTAR funded project that investigates ocean world seismology using terrestrial analogs. The goals of the SIIOS experiment include quantitatively comparing flight-candidate seismometers to traditional instruments, comparing single-station approaches to a small-aperture array, and characterizing the local seismic environment of our field sites. Here we present an analysis of detected local events at our field sites at Gulkana Glacier in Alaska and in Northwest Greenland approximately 80 km North of Qaanaaq, Greenland. Both field sites passively recorded data for about two weeks. We deployed our experiment on Gulkana Glacier in September 2017 and in Greenland in June 2018. At Gulkana there was a nearby USGS weather station which recorded wind data. Temperature data was collected using the MERRA satellite. In Greenland we deployed our own weather station to collect temperature and wind data. Gulkana represents a noisier and more active environment. Temperatures fluctuated around 0C, allowing for surface runoff to occur during the day. The glacier had several moulins, and during deployment we heard several rockfalls from nearby mountains. In addition to the local environment, Gulkana is located close to an active plate boundary (relative to Greenland). This meant that there were more regional events recorded over two weeks, than in Greenland. Greenlands local environment was also quieter, and less active. Temperatures remained below freezing. The Greenland ice was much thicker than Gulkana (~850 m versus ~100 m) and our stations were above a subglacial lake. Both conditions can reduce event detections from basal motion. Lastly, we encased our Greenland array in an aluminum vault and buried it beneath the surface unlike our array in Gulkana where the instruments were at the surface and covered with plastic bins. The vault further insulated the array from thermal and atmospheric events

Lunar Seismology: An Update on Interior Structure Models

An international team of researchers gathered, with the support of the Interna- tional Space Science Institute (ISSI), (1) to review seismological investigations of the lunar interior from the Apollo-era and up until the present and (2) to re-assess our level of knowl- edge and uncertainty on the interior structure of the Moon. A companion paper (Nunn et al. in Space Sci. Rev., submitted) reviews and discusses the Apollo lunar seismic data with the aim of creating a new reference seismic data set for future use by the community. In this study, we first review information pertinent to the interior of the Moon that has become available since the Apollo lunar landings, particularly in the past ten years, from orbiting spacecraft, continuing measurements, modeling studies, and laboratory experiments. Fol- lowing this, we discuss and compare a set of recent published models of the lunar interior, including a detailed review of attenuation and scattering properties of the Moon. Common features and discrepancies between models and moonquake locations provide a first esti- mate of the error bars on the various seismic parameters. Eventually, to assess the influence of model parameterisation and error propagation on inverted seismic velocity models, an inversion test is presented where three different parameterisations are considered. For this purpose, we employ the travel time data set gathered in our companion paper (Nunn et al. in Space Sci. Rev., submitted). The error bars of the inverted seismic velocity models demon- strate that the Apollo lunar seismic data mainly constrain the upper- and mid-mantle struc- ture to a depth of ∼1200 km. While variable, there is some indication for an upper mantle low-velocity zone (depth range 100–250 km), which is compatible with a temperature gradi- ◦ent around 1.7 C/km. This upper mantle thermal gradient could be related to the presence of the thermally anomalous region known as the Procellarum Kreep Terrane, which contains a large amount of heat producing elements

Seismic detection of the martian core by InSight

A plethora of geophysical, geo- chemical, and geodynamical observations indicate that the terrestrial planets have differentiated into silicate crusts and mantles that surround a dense core. The latter consists primarily of Fe and some lighter alloying elements (e.g., S, Si, C, O, and H) [1]¿. The Martian meteorites show evidence of chalcophile element depletion, suggesting that the otherwise Fe-Ni- rich core likely contains a sulfide component, which influences physical state

Seismic detection of the martian core

Clues to a planet's geologic history are contained in its interior structure, particularly its core. We detected reflections of seismic waves from the core-mantle boundary of Mars using InSight seismic data and inverted these together with geodetic data to constrain the radius of the liquid metal core to 1830 +/- 40 kilometers. The large core implies a martian mantle mineralogically similar to the terrestrial upper mantle and transition zone but differing from Earth by not having a bridgmanite-dominated lower mantle. We inferred a mean core density of 5.7 to 6.3 grams per cubic centimeter, which requires a substantial complement of light elements dissolved in the iron-nickel core. The seismic core shadow as seen from InSight's location covers half the surface of Mars, including the majority of potentially active regions-e.g., Tharsis-possibly limiting the number of detectable marsquakes.This is InSight contribution 200. We acknowledge NASA, CNES, and partner agencies and institutions (UKSA, SSO, ESA-PRODEX, DLR, JPL, IPGP-CNRS, ETHZ, IC, and MPS-MPG) for the development of SEIS. Numerical simulations were supported by a grant from the Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CSCS) under project ID s922 as well as HPC resources of CINES under the allocation A0090407341, made by GENCI. We thank B. Dintrans, director of CINES, for his efficient handling of our request for computational time. Figures were created using matplotlib (83), seismic data processing was done in ObsPy (84), and numerical evaluation was done in NumPy and SciPy (85, 86). Funding: S.C.S., A.K., D.G., J.C., A.C.D., G.Z., and N.D. acknowledge support from ETHZ through the ETH+ funding scheme (ETH+2 19-1: “Planet MARS”). S.C.S. acknowledges funding from ETH research grant ETH-10 17-3. W.B.B., A.G.M., M.P.P., and S.E.S. were supported by the NASA InSight mission and funds from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NM0018D0004). D.A. has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement 724690). The French teams acknowledge support from CNES as well as Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-14-CE36-0012-02 and ANR-19-CE31-0008-08). A.R. was financially supported by the Belgian PRODEX program managed by the European Space Agency in collaboration with the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office. M.S. wishes to thank SANIMS (RTI2018-095594-B-I00). M.v.D. received support from the ERC under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 program (grant no. 714069). D.S. and C.S. acknowledge funding from ETH research grant ETH-06 17-02. J.C.E.I. acknowledges support from NASA grant 80NSSC18K1633. N.S., D.K., Q.H., R.M., V.L., and A.G.M. acknowledge NASA grant 80NSSC18K1628 for support. V.L. acknowledges support from the Packard Foundation. W.T.P. and C.C. received funding from the UK Space Agency, grant ST/S001239/1. A.H. was funded by the UK Space Agency (grant ST/R002096/1). A.-C.P. acknowledges the financial support and endorsement from the DLR Management Board Young Research Group Leader Program and the Executive Board Member for Space Research and Technology. Author contributions: S.C.S., D.G., S.C., R.F.G., Q.H., D.K., V.L., M.S., N.S., D.S., É.S., C.S., and G.Z. analyzed the seismic data and made ScS arrival time picks. S.C.S., P.L., D.G., Z.X., C.C., and W.T.P. performed the statistical analysis of the observed signals. S.C.S., Q.H., N.S., R.M., and A.G.M. identified the arrivals as ScS waves based on interior models from A.K., H.S., and A.R. A.K., M.D., A.C.D., and H.S. performed the inversions. S.C.S., A.K., P.L., D.G., D.A., J.C.E.I., M.K., C.P., A.-C.P., A.R., T.G., and S.E.S. participated and contributed to the interpretation of the results. Review of the continuous data and detection of marsquakes was done by S.C.S., S.C., G.Z., C.C., N.D., J.C., M.v.D., T.K., M.P., and A.H. with operational support by É.B., C.P., and P.M.D. S.C.S. and A.K. wrote the central part of the paper with contributions from H.S., N.S., D.A., J.C.E.I., A.G.M., A.-C.P., A.R., J.C., and M.v.D. J.C.E.I., R.M., M.K., and V.L. reviewed the contributions to the supplementary materials. The InSight mission is managed by W.B.B., M.P.P., and S.E.S. The SEIS instrument development was led by P.L., D.G., W.T.P., and W.B.B. Supplementary section 1 was written by M.S., D.S., and É.S. with contributions from S.C.S., C.S., and Z.X. Supplementary section 2 was written by D.K. and V.L. with contributions from J.C.E.I. and N.S. Supplementary section 3 was written by M.S. and É.S. Supplementary section 4 was written by R.F.G. with contributions from M.D. Supplementary section 5 was written by Q.H. with contributions from N.S. Supplementary section 6 was written by S.C.S. with contributions from the authors of the other supplements. Supplementary section 7 was written by Z.X. and C.C. with contributions from P.L. and W.T.P. Supplementary section 8 was written by A.K., M.D., A.C.D., and H.S. Supplementary section 9 was written by M.D. Supplementary section 10 was written by A.C.D., A.K., and M.D. Supplementary section 11 was written by D.A. and A.R. with contributions from A.K. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data and materials availability: We thank the operators of JPL, SISMOC, MSDS, IRIS-DMC, and PDS for providing SEED SEIS data (87). Three hundred interior models derived in this study are available from MSDS (88)

Small-Array Location Capabilities Using the Seismometer to Investigate Ice and Ocean Structure (SIIOS): Implications for an Ocean World Lander

Ocean worlds have thick icy shells covering subsurface oceans. Due to the potential habitability of the subsurface ocean, Europa has become a target for a potential lander mission. Seismology is the preeminent method for constraining the thickness of an icy shell. The Seismometer to Investigate Ice and Ocean Structure (SIIOS) uses flight-candidate instrumentation to develop approaches for seismic studies of icy bodies. The SIIOS team deployed small aperture seismic arrays on Gulkana Glacier in 2017 and in Northwest Greenland in 2018

The interior of Mars as seen by InSight (Invited)

InSight is the first planetary mission dedicated to exploring the whole interior of a planet using geophysical methods, specifically seismology and geodesy. To this end, we observed seismic waves of distant marsquakes and inverted for interior models using differential travel times of phases reflected at the surface (PP, SS...) or the core mantle-boundary (ScS), as well as those converted at crustal interfaces. Compared to previous orbital observations1-3, the seismic data added decisive new insights with consequences for the formation of Mars: The global average crustal thickness of 24-75 km is at the low end of pre-mission estimates5. Together with the the thick lithosphere of 450-600 km5, this requires an enrichment of heat-producing elements in the crust by a factor of 13-20, compared to the primitive mantle. The iron-rich liquid core is 1790-1870 km in radius6, which rules out the existence of an insulating bridgmanite-dominated lower mantle on Mars. The large, and therefore low-density core needs a high amount of light elements. Given the geochemical boundary conditions, Sulfur alone cannot explain the estimated density of ~6 g/cm3 and volatile elements, such as oxygen, carbon or hydrogen are needed in significant amounts. This observation is difficult to reconcile with classical models of late formation from the same material as Earth. We also give an overview of open questions after three years of InSight operation on the surface of Mars, such as the potential existence of an inner core or compositional layers above the CM

On‐Deck Seismology: Lessons from InSight for Future Planetary Seismology

Before deploying to the surface of Mars, the short‐period (SP) seismometer of the InSight mission operated on deck for a total of 48 hr. This data set can be used to understand how deck‐mounted seismometers can be used in future landed missions to Mars, Europa, and other planetary bodies. While operating on deck, the SP seismometer showed signals comparable to the Viking‐2 seismometer near 3 Hz where the sensitivity of the Viking instrument peaked. Wind sensitivity showed similar patterns to the Viking instrument, although amplitudes on InSight were ∼80% larger for a given wind velocity. However, during the low‐wind evening hours, the instrument noise levels at frequencies between 0.1 and 1 Hz were comparable to quiet stations on Earth, although deployment to the surface below the Wind and Thermal Shield lowered installation noise by roughly 40 dB in acceleration power. With the observed noise levels and estimated seismicity rates for Mars, detection probability for quakes for a deck‐mounted instrument is low enough that up to years of on‐deck recordings may be necessary to observe an event. Because the noise is dominated by wind acting on the lander, though, deck‐mounted seismometers may be more practical for deployment on airless bodies, and it is important to evaluate the seismicity of the target body and the specific design of the lander. Detection probabilities for operation on Europa reach over 99% for some proposed seismicity models for a similar duration of operation if noise levels are comparable to low‐wind time periods on Mars

Paradox-Breaking RAF Inhibitors that Also Target SRC Are Effective in Drug-Resistant BRAF Mutant Melanoma

SummaryBRAF and MEK inhibitors are effective in BRAF mutant melanoma, but most patients eventually relapse with acquired resistance, and others present intrinsic resistance to these drugs. Resistance is often mediated by pathway reactivation through receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)/SRC-family kinase (SFK) signaling or mutant NRAS, which drive paradoxical reactivation of the pathway. We describe pan-RAF inhibitors (CCT196969, CCT241161) that also inhibit SFKs. These compounds do not drive paradoxical pathway activation and inhibit MEK/ERK in BRAF and NRAS mutant melanoma. They inhibit melanoma cells and patient-derived xenografts that are resistant to BRAF and BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Thus, paradox-breaking pan-RAF inhibitors that also inhibit SFKs could provide first-line treatment for BRAF and NRAS mutant melanomas and second-line treatment for patients who develop resistance