24 research outputs found
P2 purinergic receptor modulation of cytokine production
Cytokines serve important functions in controlling host immunity. Cells involved in the synthesis of these polypeptide mediators have evolved highly regulated processes to ensure that production is carefully balanced. In inflammatory and immune disorders, however, mis-regulation of the production and/or activity of cytokines is recognized as a major contributor to the disease process, and therapeutics that target individual cytokines are providing very effective treatment options in the clinic. Leukocytes are the principle producers of a number of key cytokines, and these cells also express numerous members of the purinergic P2 receptor family. Studies in several cellular systems have provided evidence that P2 receptor modulation can affect cytokine production, and mechanistic features of this regulation have emerged. This review highlights three separate examples corresponding to (1) P2Y6 receptor mediated impact on interleukin (IL)-8 production, (2) P2Y11 receptor-mediated affects on IL-12/23 output, and (3) P2X7 receptor mediated IL-1β posttranslational processing. These examples demonstrate important roles of purinergic receptors in the modulation of cytokine production. Extension of these cellular observations to in vivo situations may lead to new therapeutic strategies for treating cytokine-mediated diseases
Tratamientos Psicológicos Empíricamente Apoyados Para Adultos: Una Revisión Selectiva [Evidence-Based Psychological Treatments for Adults: A Selective Review]
Antecedentes: los tratamientos psicológicos han mostrado su efi cacia,
efectividad y efi ciencia para el abordaje de los trastornos mentales; no
obstante, considerando el conocimiento científi co generado en los últimos
años, no se dispone de trabajos de actualización en español sobre cuáles
son los tratamientos psicológicos con respaldo empírico. El objetivo fue
realizar una revisión selectiva de los principales tratamientos psicológicos
empíricamente apoyados para el abordaje de trastornos mentales en personas
adultas. Método: se recogen niveles de evidencia y grados de recomendación
en función de los criterios propuestos por el Sistema Nacional de Salud
de España (en las Guías de Práctica Clínica) para diferentes trastornos
psicológicos. Resultados: los resultados sugieren que los tratamientos
psicológicos disponen de apoyo empírico para el abordaje de un amplio
elenco de trastornos psicológicos. El grado de apoyo empírico oscila de bajo
a alto en función del trastorno psicológico analizado. La revisión sugiere
que ciertos campos de intervención necesitan una mayor investigación.
Conclusiones: a partir de esta revisión selectiva, los profesionales de la
psicología podrán disponer de información rigurosa y actualizada que les
permita tomar decisiones informadas a la hora de implementar aquellos
procedimientos psicoterapéuticos empíricamente fundamentados en
función de las características de las personas que demandan ayuda.
// Evidence-Based Psychological Treatments for Adults: A Selective Review. Background: Psychological treatments have shown their effi cacy,
effectiveness, and effi ciency in dealing with mental disorders. However,
considering the scientifi c knowledge generated in recent years, in the
Spanish context, there are no updating studies about empirically supported psychological treatments. The main goal was to carry out a selective
review of the main empirically supported psychological treatments for
mental disorders in adults. Method: Levels of evidence and degrees of recommendation were collected based on the criteria proposed by the Spanish National Health System (Clinical Practice Guidelines) for different
psychological disorders. Results: The results indicate that psychological
treatments have empirical support for the approach to a wide range of
psychological disorders. These levels of empirical evidence gathered range from low to high depending on the psychological disorder analysed.
The review indicates the existence of certain fi elds of intervention that
need further investigation. Conclusions: Based on this selective review,
psychology professionals will be able to have rigorous, up-to-date information that allows them to make informed decisions when implementing
empirically based psychotherapeutic procedures based on the characteristics of the people who require help
Ocorrências em pronto-socorro: eventos sentinela para o monitoramento da atenção básica de saúde
Tratamientos psicológicos empíricamente apoyados para adultos: Una revisión selectiva
Antecedentes: los tratamientos psicológicos han mostrado su eficacia, efectividad y eficiencia para el abordaje de los trastornos mentales; no obstante, considerando el conocimiento científico generado en los últimos años, no se dispone de trabajos de actualización en español sobre cuáles son los tratamientos psicológicos con respaldo empírico. El objetivo fue realizar una revisión selectiva de los principales tratamientos psicológicos empíricamente apoyados para el abordaje de trastornos mentales en personas adultas. Método: se recogen niveles de evidencia y grados de recomendación en función de los criterios propuestos por el Sistema Nacional de Salud de España (en las Guías de Práctica Clínica) para diferentes trastornos psicológicos. Resultados: los resultados sugieren que los tratamientos psicológicos disponen de apoyo empírico para el abordaje de un amplio elenco de trastornos psicológicos. El grado de apoyo empírico oscila de bajo a alto en función del trastorno psicológico analizado. La revisión sugiere que ciertos campos de intervención necesitan una mayor investigación. Conclusiones: a partir de esta revisión selectiva, los profesionales de la psicología podrán disponer de información rigurosa y actualizada que les permita tomar decisiones informadas a la hora de implementar aquellos procedimientos psicoterapéuticos empíricamente fundamentados en función de las características de las personas que demandan ayuda.
Background: Psychological treatments have shown their efficacy, effectiveness, and efficiency in dealing with mental disorders. However, considering the scientific knowledge generated in recent years, in the Spanish context, there are no updating studies about empirically supported psychological treatments. The main goal was to carry out a selective review of the main empirically supported psychological treatments for mental disorders in adults. Method: Levels of evidence and degrees of recommendation were collected based on the criteria proposed by the Spanish National Health System (Clinical Practice Guidelines) for different psychological disorders. Results: The results indicate that psychological treatments have empirical support for the approach to a wide range of psychological disorders. These levels of empirical evidence gathered range from low to high depending on the psychological disorder analysed. The review indicates the existence of certain fields of intervention that need further investigation. Conclusions: Based on this selective review, psychology professionals will be able to have rigorous, up-to-date information that allows them to make informed decisions when implementing empirically based psychotherapeutic procedures based on the characteristics of the people who require help
Nurses' perceptions of aids and obstacles to the provision of optimal end of life care in ICU
Contains fulltext :
172380.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access
Multiple and mixed methods in formative evaluation: Is more better? Reflections from a South African study
Abstract Background Formative programme evaluations assess intervention implementation processes, and are seen widely as a way of unlocking the ‘black box’ of any programme in order to explore and understand why a programme functions as it does. However, few critical assessments of the methods used in such evaluations are available, and there are especially few that reflect on how well the evaluation achieved its objectives. This paper describes a formative evaluation of a community-based lay health worker programme for TB and HIV/AIDS clients across three low-income communities in South Africa. It assesses each of the methods used in relation to the evaluation objectives, and offers suggestions on ways of optimising the use of multiple, mixed-methods within formative evaluations of complex health system interventions. Methods The evaluation’s qualitative methods comprised interviews, focus groups, observations and diary keeping. Quantitative methods included a time-and-motion study of the lay health workers’ scope of practice and a client survey. The authors conceptualised and conducted the evaluation, and through iterative discussions, assessed the methods used and their results. Results Overall, the evaluation highlighted programme issues and insights beyond the reach of traditional single methods evaluations. The strengths of the multiple, mixed-methods in this evaluation included a detailed description and nuanced understanding of the programme and its implementation, and triangulation of the perspectives and experiences of clients, lay health workers, and programme managers. However, the use of multiple methods needs to be carefully planned and implemented as this approach can overstretch the logistic and analytic resources of an evaluation. Conclusions For complex interventions, formative evaluation designs including multiple qualitative and quantitative methods hold distinct advantages over single method evaluations. However, their value is not in the number of methods used, but in how each method matches the evaluation questions and the scientific integrity with which the methods are selected and implemented