La posverdad sobre la pandemia del Covid - 19 en la Fan Page de Ozono televisión primera fase de confinamiento, 2020

La presente investigación tiene como objetivo principal Analizar la posverdad de la información de los contenidos publicados en la fan page de Ozono Televisión sobre la pandemia Covid-19 en su primera fase de confinamiento, 2020. El tipo de investigación fue cualitativa con diseño descriptivo. La muestra de estudio estuvo conformada por 12 publicaciones de la fan page de Ozono Televisión durante los meses de marzo, abril y mayo. Estas fueron seleccionadas por criterios de conveniencia. El instrumento que se utilizó para la recolección de datos fue la guía de observación. La investigación concluyó que la posverdad de la información sobre la pandemia Covid-19 en su primera fase es alta debido a que más de la mitad de noticias publicadas en la fan page de Ozono Televisión no cumplen con los elementos de la información para garantizar la autenticidad de dicha noticia. Además, se concluyó que existe un alto nivel de interacción por parte de los usuariosThe main objective of this research is to analyze the post-truth information of the content published on the Ozono Televisión fan page about the Covid-19 pandemic in its first phase of confinement, 2020. The type of research was qualitative with a descriptive design. The study sample consisted of 12 publications on the Ozono Televisión fan page during the months of March, April and May. These were selected by criteria of convenience. The instrument used for data collection was the observation guide. The investigation concluded that the post-truth of the information on the Covid-19 pandemic in its first phase is high because more than half of the news published on the Ozono Televisión fan page do not comply with the elements of the information to guarantee authenticity. of said news. In addition, it was concluded that there is a high level of interaction by users.Tesi

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries